| Message ID | 8e320ac8861b7fdd657a66138780c18fd66b1a19.1525354194.git-series.kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Kieran, Thank you for the patch. On Thursday, 3 May 2018 16:36:21 EEST Kieran Bingham wrote: > Calculate the top and bottom fields for the interlaced frames and > utilise the extended display list command feature to implement the > auto-field operations. This allows the DU to update the VSP2 registers > dynamically based upon the currently processing field. > > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > > --- > v3: > - Pass DL through partition calls to allow autocmd's to be retrieved > - Document interlaced field in struct vsp1_du_atomic_config > > v2: > - fix erroneous BIT value which enabled interlaced > - fix field handling at frame_end interrupt > --- > drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c | 10 ++++- > drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c | 11 ++++- > drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h | 1 +- > drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h | 1 +- > include/media/vsp1.h | 2 +- > 6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c > b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c index d33ae5f125bd..bbe9f3006f71 > 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c > @@ -906,6 +906,8 @@ void vsp1_dl_list_commit(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl, bool > internal) */ > unsigned int vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm) > { > + struct vsp1_device *vsp1 = dlm->vsp1; > + u32 status = vsp1_read(vsp1, VI6_STATUS); > unsigned int flags = 0; > > spin_lock(&dlm->lock); > @@ -931,6 +933,14 @@ unsigned int vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct > vsp1_dl_manager *dlm) goto done; > > /* > + * Progressive streams report only TOP fields. If we have a BOTTOM > + * field, we are interlaced, and expect the frame to complete on the > + * next frame end interrupt. > + */ > + if (status & VI6_STATUS_FLD_STD(dlm->index)) > + goto done; > + > + /* > * The device starts processing the queued display list right after the > * frame end interrupt. The display list thus becomes active. > */ > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c > b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c index 2c3db8b8adce..cc29c9d96bb7 > 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c > @@ -811,6 +811,17 @@ int vsp1_du_atomic_update(struct device *dev, unsigned > int pipe_index, return -EINVAL; > } > > + if (!(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL)) && cfg->interlaced) { Nitpicking, writing the condition as if (cfg->interlaced && !(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL))) would match the comment better. You can also drop the parentheses around the vsp1_feature() call. > + /* > + * Interlaced support requires extended display lists to > + * provide the auto-fld feature with the DU. > + */ > + dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "Interlaced unsupported on this output\n"); Could we catch this in the DU driver to fail atomic test ? > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + rpf->interlaced = cfg->interlaced; > + > rpf->fmtinfo = fmtinfo; > rpf->format.num_planes = fmtinfo->planes; > rpf->format.plane_fmt[0].bytesperline = cfg->pitch; > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h > b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h index d054767570c1..a2ac65cc5155 > 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ > #define VI6_SRESET_SRTS(n) (1 << (n)) > > #define VI6_STATUS 0x0038 > +#define VI6_STATUS_FLD_STD(n) (1 << ((n) + 28)) > #define VI6_STATUS_SYS_ACT(n) (1 << ((n) + 8)) > > #define VI6_WPF_IRQ_ENB(n) (0x0048 + (n) * 12) > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c > b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c index 8fae7c485642..511b2e127820 > 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c > @@ -20,6 +20,20 @@ > #define RPF_MAX_WIDTH 8190 > #define RPF_MAX_HEIGHT 8190 > > +/* Pre extended display list command data structure */ > +struct vsp1_extcmd_auto_fld_body { > + u32 top_y0; > + u32 bottom_y0; > + u32 top_c0; > + u32 bottom_c0; > + u32 top_c1; > + u32 bottom_c1; > + u32 reserved0; > + u32 reserved1; > +} __packed; > + > +#define VSP1_DL_EXT_AUTOFLD_INT BIT(0) Should the bit definition be moved to vsp1_regs.h ? > /* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > * Device Access > */ > @@ -64,6 +78,14 @@ static void rpf_configure_stream(struct vsp1_entity > *entity, pstride |= format->plane_fmt[1].bytesperline > << VI6_RPF_SRCM_PSTRIDE_C_SHIFT; > > + /* > + * pstride has both STRIDE_Y and STRIDE_C, but multiplying the whole > + * of pstride by 2 is conveniently OK here as we are multiplying both > + * values. > + */ > + if (rpf->interlaced) > + pstride *= 2; > + > vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_PSTRIDE, pstride); > > /* Format */ > @@ -100,6 +122,9 @@ static void rpf_configure_stream(struct vsp1_entity > *entity, top = compose->top; > } > > + if (rpf->interlaced) > + top /= 2; > + > vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_LOC, > (left << VI6_RPF_LOC_HCOORD_SHIFT) | > (top << VI6_RPF_LOC_VCOORD_SHIFT)); > @@ -169,6 +194,31 @@ static void rpf_configure_stream(struct vsp1_entity > *entity, > > } > > +static void vsp1_rpf_configure_autofld(struct vsp1_rwpf *rpf, > + struct vsp1_dl_ext_cmd *cmd) > +{ > + const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *format = &rpf->format; > + struct vsp1_extcmd_auto_fld_body *auto_fld = cmd->data; > + u32 offset_y, offset_c; > + > + /* Re-index our auto_fld to match the current RPF */ s/RPF/RPF./ > + auto_fld = &auto_fld[rpf->entity.index]; > + > + auto_fld->top_y0 = rpf->mem.addr[0]; > + auto_fld->top_c0 = rpf->mem.addr[1]; > + auto_fld->top_c1 = rpf->mem.addr[2]; > + > + offset_y = format->plane_fmt[0].bytesperline; > + offset_c = format->plane_fmt[1].bytesperline; > + > + auto_fld->bottom_y0 = rpf->mem.addr[0] + offset_y; > + auto_fld->bottom_c0 = rpf->mem.addr[1] + offset_c; > + auto_fld->bottom_c1 = rpf->mem.addr[2] + offset_c; > + > + cmd->flags |= VSP1_DL_EXT_AUTOFLD_INT; > + cmd->flags |= BIT(16 + rpf->entity.index); Do you expect some flags to already be set ? If not, couldn't we assign the value to the field instead of OR'ing it ? > +} > + > static void rpf_configure_frame(struct vsp1_entity *entity, > struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe, > struct vsp1_dl_list *dl, > @@ -192,6 +242,7 @@ static void rpf_configure_partition(struct vsp1_entity > *entity, struct vsp1_rwpf *rpf = to_rwpf(&entity->subdev); > struct vsp1_rwpf_memory mem = rpf->mem; > struct vsp1_device *vsp1 = rpf->entity.vsp1; > + struct vsp1_dl_ext_cmd *cmd; > const struct vsp1_format_info *fmtinfo = rpf->fmtinfo; > const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *format = &rpf->format; > struct v4l2_rect crop; > @@ -220,6 +271,11 @@ static void rpf_configure_partition(struct vsp1_entity > *entity, crop.left += pipe->partition->rpf.left; > } > > + if (rpf->interlaced) { > + crop.height = round_down(crop.height / 2, fmtinfo->vsub); > + crop.top = round_down(crop.top / 2, fmtinfo->vsub); > + } > + > vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRC_BSIZE, > (crop.width << VI6_RPF_SRC_BSIZE_BHSIZE_SHIFT) | > (crop.height << VI6_RPF_SRC_BSIZE_BVSIZE_SHIFT)); > @@ -248,9 +304,18 @@ static void rpf_configure_partition(struct vsp1_entity > *entity, fmtinfo->swap_uv) > swap(mem.addr[1], mem.addr[2]); > > - vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_Y, mem.addr[0]); > - vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C0, mem.addr[1]); > - vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C1, mem.addr[2]); > + /* > + * Interlaced pipelines will use the extended pre-cmd to process > + * SRCM_ADDR_{Y,C0,C1} > + */ > + if (rpf->interlaced) { > + cmd = vsp1_dlm_get_autofld_cmd(dl); How about moving this call to vsp1_rpf_configure_autofld() ? > + vsp1_rpf_configure_autofld(rpf, cmd); > + } else { > + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_Y, mem.addr[0]); > + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C0, mem.addr[1]); > + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C1, mem.addr[2]); > + } > } > > static void rpf_partition(struct vsp1_entity *entity, > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h > b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h index 70742ecf766f..8d6e42f27908 > 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct vsp1_rwpf { > struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane format; > const struct vsp1_format_info *fmtinfo; > unsigned int brx_input; > + bool interlaced; Shouldn't this be stored in the pipeline instead ? Interlacing is a property of the whole pipeline, not of each input individually. > unsigned int alpha; > > diff --git a/include/media/vsp1.h b/include/media/vsp1.h > index 678c24de1ac6..c10883f30980 100644 > --- a/include/media/vsp1.h > +++ b/include/media/vsp1.h > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ int vsp1_du_setup_lif(struct device *dev, unsigned int > pipe_index, > * @dst: destination rectangle on the display (integer coordinates) > * @alpha: alpha value (0: fully transparent, 255: fully opaque) > * @zpos: Z position of the plane (from 0 to number of planes minus 1) > + * @interlaced: true for interlaced pipelines > */ > struct vsp1_du_atomic_config { > u32 pixelformat; > @@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ struct vsp1_du_atomic_config { > struct v4l2_rect dst; > unsigned int alpha; > unsigned int zpos; > + bool interlaced; For the same reason shouldn't the interlaced flag be moved to vsp1_du_lif_config ? > }; > > /**
Hi Laurent, Some questions here too :) On 24/05/18 13:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Kieran, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Thursday, 3 May 2018 16:36:21 EEST Kieran Bingham wrote: >> Calculate the top and bottom fields for the interlaced frames and >> utilise the extended display list command feature to implement the >> auto-field operations. This allows the DU to update the VSP2 registers >> dynamically based upon the currently processing field. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >> >> --- >> v3: >> - Pass DL through partition calls to allow autocmd's to be retrieved >> - Document interlaced field in struct vsp1_du_atomic_config >> >> v2: >> - fix erroneous BIT value which enabled interlaced >> - fix field handling at frame_end interrupt >> --- >> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c | 10 ++++- >> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c | 11 ++++- >> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h | 1 +- >> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h | 1 +- >> include/media/vsp1.h | 2 +- >> 6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c >> b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c index d33ae5f125bd..bbe9f3006f71 >> 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c >> @@ -906,6 +906,8 @@ void vsp1_dl_list_commit(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl, bool >> internal) */ >> unsigned int vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm) >> { >> + struct vsp1_device *vsp1 = dlm->vsp1; >> + u32 status = vsp1_read(vsp1, VI6_STATUS); >> unsigned int flags = 0; >> >> spin_lock(&dlm->lock); >> @@ -931,6 +933,14 @@ unsigned int vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct >> vsp1_dl_manager *dlm) goto done; >> >> /* >> + * Progressive streams report only TOP fields. If we have a BOTTOM >> + * field, we are interlaced, and expect the frame to complete on the >> + * next frame end interrupt. >> + */ >> + if (status & VI6_STATUS_FLD_STD(dlm->index)) >> + goto done; >> + >> + /* >> * The device starts processing the queued display list right after the >> * frame end interrupt. The display list thus becomes active. >> */ >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c >> b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c index 2c3db8b8adce..cc29c9d96bb7 >> 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c >> @@ -811,6 +811,17 @@ int vsp1_du_atomic_update(struct device *dev, unsigned >> int pipe_index, return -EINVAL; >> } >> >> + if (!(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL)) && cfg->interlaced) { > > Nitpicking, writing the condition as > > if (cfg->interlaced && !(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL))) Done. > > would match the comment better. You can also drop the parentheses around the > vsp1_feature() call. > >> + /* >> + * Interlaced support requires extended display lists to >> + * provide the auto-fld feature with the DU. >> + */ >> + dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "Interlaced unsupported on this output\n"); > > Could we catch this in the DU driver to fail atomic test ? Ugh - I thought moving the configuration to vsp1_du_setup_lif() would give us this, but that return value is not checked in the DU. How can we interogate the VSP1 to ask it if it supports interlaced from rcar_du_vsp_plane_atomic_check()? Some dummy call to vsp1_du_setup_lif() to check the return value ? Or should we implement a hook to call through to perform checks in the VSP1 DRM API? > >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + rpf->interlaced = cfg->interlaced; >> + >> rpf->fmtinfo = fmtinfo; >> rpf->format.num_planes = fmtinfo->planes; >> rpf->format.plane_fmt[0].bytesperline = cfg->pitch; >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h >> b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h index d054767570c1..a2ac65cc5155 >> 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h >> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ >> #define VI6_SRESET_SRTS(n) (1 << (n)) >> >> #define VI6_STATUS 0x0038 >> +#define VI6_STATUS_FLD_STD(n) (1 << ((n) + 28)) >> #define VI6_STATUS_SYS_ACT(n) (1 << ((n) + 8)) >> >> #define VI6_WPF_IRQ_ENB(n) (0x0048 + (n) * 12) >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c >> b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c index 8fae7c485642..511b2e127820 >> 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c >> @@ -20,6 +20,20 @@ >> #define RPF_MAX_WIDTH 8190 >> #define RPF_MAX_HEIGHT 8190 >> >> +/* Pre extended display list command data structure */ >> +struct vsp1_extcmd_auto_fld_body { >> + u32 top_y0; >> + u32 bottom_y0; >> + u32 top_c0; >> + u32 bottom_c0; >> + u32 top_c1; >> + u32 bottom_c1; >> + u32 reserved0; >> + u32 reserved1; >> +} __packed; >> + >> +#define VSP1_DL_EXT_AUTOFLD_INT BIT(0) > > Should the bit definition be moved to vsp1_regs.h ? Moved, (and renamed s/VSP1_/VI6_/) > >> /* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> * Device Access >> */ >> @@ -64,6 +78,14 @@ static void rpf_configure_stream(struct vsp1_entity >> *entity, pstride |= format->plane_fmt[1].bytesperline >> << VI6_RPF_SRCM_PSTRIDE_C_SHIFT; >> >> + /* >> + * pstride has both STRIDE_Y and STRIDE_C, but multiplying the whole >> + * of pstride by 2 is conveniently OK here as we are multiplying both >> + * values. >> + */ >> + if (rpf->interlaced) >> + pstride *= 2; >> + >> vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_PSTRIDE, pstride); >> >> /* Format */ >> @@ -100,6 +122,9 @@ static void rpf_configure_stream(struct vsp1_entity >> *entity, top = compose->top; >> } >> >> + if (rpf->interlaced) >> + top /= 2; >> + >> vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_LOC, >> (left << VI6_RPF_LOC_HCOORD_SHIFT) | >> (top << VI6_RPF_LOC_VCOORD_SHIFT)); >> @@ -169,6 +194,31 @@ static void rpf_configure_stream(struct vsp1_entity >> *entity, >> >> } >> >> +static void vsp1_rpf_configure_autofld(struct vsp1_rwpf *rpf, >> + struct vsp1_dl_ext_cmd *cmd) >> +{ >> + const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *format = &rpf->format; >> + struct vsp1_extcmd_auto_fld_body *auto_fld = cmd->data; >> + u32 offset_y, offset_c; >> + >> + /* Re-index our auto_fld to match the current RPF */ > > s/RPF/RPF./ Fixed. > >> + auto_fld = &auto_fld[rpf->entity.index]; >> + >> + auto_fld->top_y0 = rpf->mem.addr[0]; >> + auto_fld->top_c0 = rpf->mem.addr[1]; >> + auto_fld->top_c1 = rpf->mem.addr[2]; >> + >> + offset_y = format->plane_fmt[0].bytesperline; >> + offset_c = format->plane_fmt[1].bytesperline; >> + >> + auto_fld->bottom_y0 = rpf->mem.addr[0] + offset_y; >> + auto_fld->bottom_c0 = rpf->mem.addr[1] + offset_c; >> + auto_fld->bottom_c1 = rpf->mem.addr[2] + offset_c; >> + >> + cmd->flags |= VSP1_DL_EXT_AUTOFLD_INT; >> + cmd->flags |= BIT(16 + rpf->entity.index); > > Do you expect some flags to already be set ? If not, couldn't we assign the > value to the field instead of OR'ing it ? No, I think you are correct. Moved to a single expression setting the cmd->flags in one line. > >> +} >> + >> static void rpf_configure_frame(struct vsp1_entity *entity, >> struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe, >> struct vsp1_dl_list *dl, >> @@ -192,6 +242,7 @@ static void rpf_configure_partition(struct vsp1_entity >> *entity, struct vsp1_rwpf *rpf = to_rwpf(&entity->subdev); >> struct vsp1_rwpf_memory mem = rpf->mem; >> struct vsp1_device *vsp1 = rpf->entity.vsp1; >> + struct vsp1_dl_ext_cmd *cmd; >> const struct vsp1_format_info *fmtinfo = rpf->fmtinfo; >> const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *format = &rpf->format; >> struct v4l2_rect crop; >> @@ -220,6 +271,11 @@ static void rpf_configure_partition(struct vsp1_entity >> *entity, crop.left += pipe->partition->rpf.left; >> } >> >> + if (rpf->interlaced) { >> + crop.height = round_down(crop.height / 2, fmtinfo->vsub); >> + crop.top = round_down(crop.top / 2, fmtinfo->vsub); >> + } >> + >> vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRC_BSIZE, >> (crop.width << VI6_RPF_SRC_BSIZE_BHSIZE_SHIFT) | >> (crop.height << VI6_RPF_SRC_BSIZE_BVSIZE_SHIFT)); >> @@ -248,9 +304,18 @@ static void rpf_configure_partition(struct vsp1_entity >> *entity, fmtinfo->swap_uv) >> swap(mem.addr[1], mem.addr[2]); >> >> - vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_Y, mem.addr[0]); >> - vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C0, mem.addr[1]); >> - vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C1, mem.addr[2]); >> + /* >> + * Interlaced pipelines will use the extended pre-cmd to process >> + * SRCM_ADDR_{Y,C0,C1} >> + */ >> + if (rpf->interlaced) { >> + cmd = vsp1_dlm_get_autofld_cmd(dl); > > How about moving this call to vsp1_rpf_configure_autofld() ? Done. > >> + vsp1_rpf_configure_autofld(rpf, cmd); >> + } else { >> + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_Y, mem.addr[0]); >> + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C0, mem.addr[1]); >> + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C1, mem.addr[2]); >> + } >> } >> >> static void rpf_partition(struct vsp1_entity *entity, >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h >> b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h index 70742ecf766f..8d6e42f27908 >> 100644 >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h >> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct vsp1_rwpf { >> struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane format; >> const struct vsp1_format_info *fmtinfo; >> unsigned int brx_input; >> + bool interlaced; > > Shouldn't this be stored in the pipeline instead ? Interlacing is a property > of the whole pipeline, not of each input individually. > Moved. >> unsigned int alpha; >> >> diff --git a/include/media/vsp1.h b/include/media/vsp1.h >> index 678c24de1ac6..c10883f30980 100644 >> --- a/include/media/vsp1.h >> +++ b/include/media/vsp1.h >> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ int vsp1_du_setup_lif(struct device *dev, unsigned int >> pipe_index, >> * @dst: destination rectangle on the display (integer coordinates) >> * @alpha: alpha value (0: fully transparent, 255: fully opaque) >> * @zpos: Z position of the plane (from 0 to number of planes minus 1) >> + * @interlaced: true for interlaced pipelines >> */ >> struct vsp1_du_atomic_config { >> u32 pixelformat; >> @@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ struct vsp1_du_atomic_config { >> struct v4l2_rect dst; >> unsigned int alpha; >> unsigned int zpos; >> + bool interlaced; > > For the same reason shouldn't the interlaced flag be moved to > vsp1_du_lif_config ? > Moved. >> }; >> >> /** >
Hi Kieran, On Monday, 16 July 2018 21:21:00 EEST Kieran Bingham wrote: > On 24/05/18 13:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thursday, 3 May 2018 16:36:21 EEST Kieran Bingham wrote: > >> Calculate the top and bottom fields for the interlaced frames and > >> utilise the extended display list command feature to implement the > >> auto-field operations. This allows the DU to update the VSP2 registers > >> dynamically based upon the currently processing field. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > >> > >> --- > >> > >> v3: > >> - Pass DL through partition calls to allow autocmd's to be retrieved > >> - Document interlaced field in struct vsp1_du_atomic_config > >> > >> v2: > >> - fix erroneous BIT value which enabled interlaced > >> - fix field handling at frame_end interrupt > >> > >> --- > >> > >> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c | 10 ++++- > >> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c | 11 ++++- > >> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h | 1 +- > >> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > >> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h | 1 +- > >> include/media/vsp1.h | 2 +- > >> 6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) [snip] > >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c > >> b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c index 2c3db8b8adce..cc29c9d96bb7 > >> 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c > >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c > >> @@ -811,6 +811,17 @@ int vsp1_du_atomic_update(struct device *dev, > >> unsigned > >> int pipe_index, return -EINVAL; > >> > >> } > >> > >> + if (!(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL)) && cfg->interlaced) { > > > > Nitpicking, writing the condition as > > > > if (cfg->interlaced && !(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL))) > > Done. > > > would match the comment better. You can also drop the parentheses around > > the vsp1_feature() call. > > > >> + /* > >> + * Interlaced support requires extended display lists to > >> + * provide the auto-fld feature with the DU. > >> + */ > >> + dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "Interlaced unsupported on this output\n"); > > > > Could we catch this in the DU driver to fail atomic test ? > > Ugh - I thought moving the configuration to vsp1_du_setup_lif() would > give us this, but that return value is not checked in the DU. > > How can we interogate the VSP1 to ask it if it supports interlaced from > rcar_du_vsp_plane_atomic_check()? > > > Some dummy call to vsp1_du_setup_lif() to check the return value ? Or > should we implement a hook to call through to perform checks in the VSP1 > DRM API? Would it be possible to just infer that from the DU compatible string, without querying the VSP driver ? Of course that's a bit of a layering violation, but as we know what type of VSP instance is present in each SoC, such a small hack wouldn't hurt in my opinion. If the need arises later we can introduce an API to query the information from the VSP driver. > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> + > >> + rpf->interlaced = cfg->interlaced; > >> + > >> rpf->fmtinfo = fmtinfo; > >> rpf->format.num_planes = fmtinfo->planes; > >> rpf->format.plane_fmt[0].bytesperline = cfg->pitch; [snip]
Hi Laurent, <snip> >>> +static void vsp1_rpf_configure_autofld(struct vsp1_rwpf *rpf, >>> + struct vsp1_dl_ext_cmd *cmd) >>> +{ >>> + const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *format = &rpf->format; >>> + struct vsp1_extcmd_auto_fld_body *auto_fld = cmd->data; >>> + u32 offset_y, offset_c; >>> + >>> + /* Re-index our auto_fld to match the current RPF */ >> >> s/RPF/RPF./ > > Fixed. > >> >>> + auto_fld = &auto_fld[rpf->entity.index]; >>> + >>> + auto_fld->top_y0 = rpf->mem.addr[0]; >>> + auto_fld->top_c0 = rpf->mem.addr[1]; >>> + auto_fld->top_c1 = rpf->mem.addr[2]; >>> + >>> + offset_y = format->plane_fmt[0].bytesperline; >>> + offset_c = format->plane_fmt[1].bytesperline; >>> + >>> + auto_fld->bottom_y0 = rpf->mem.addr[0] + offset_y; >>> + auto_fld->bottom_c0 = rpf->mem.addr[1] + offset_c; >>> + auto_fld->bottom_c1 = rpf->mem.addr[2] + offset_c; >>> + >>> + cmd->flags |= VSP1_DL_EXT_AUTOFLD_INT; >>> + cmd->flags |= BIT(16 + rpf->entity.index); >> >> Do you expect some flags to already be set ? If not, couldn't we assign the >> value to the field instead of OR'ing it ? > No, I think you are correct. Moved to a single expression setting the > cmd->flags in one line. Ahem.... no - of course these flags have to be OR-ed in. Because it potentially updates a single command object for multiple RPFs. The flags get reset to 0 when the command object is discarded in vsp1_dl_ext_cmd_put() > >> >>> +} <snip> -- Kieran
Hi Laurent, On 17/07/18 13:52, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Kieran, > > On Monday, 16 July 2018 21:21:00 EEST Kieran Bingham wrote: >> On 24/05/18 13:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> On Thursday, 3 May 2018 16:36:21 EEST Kieran Bingham wrote: >>>> Calculate the top and bottom fields for the interlaced frames and >>>> utilise the extended display list command feature to implement the >>>> auto-field operations. This allows the DU to update the VSP2 registers >>>> dynamically based upon the currently processing field. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> >>>> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> v3: >>>> - Pass DL through partition calls to allow autocmd's to be retrieved >>>> - Document interlaced field in struct vsp1_du_atomic_config >>>> >>>> v2: >>>> - fix erroneous BIT value which enabled interlaced >>>> - fix field handling at frame_end interrupt >>>> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c | 10 ++++- >>>> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c | 11 ++++- >>>> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h | 1 +- >>>> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>>> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h | 1 +- >>>> include/media/vsp1.h | 2 +- >>>> 6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > [snip] > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c >>>> b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c index 2c3db8b8adce..cc29c9d96bb7 >>>> 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c >>>> @@ -811,6 +811,17 @@ int vsp1_du_atomic_update(struct device *dev, >>>> unsigned >>>> int pipe_index, return -EINVAL; >>>> >>>> } >>>> >>>> + if (!(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL)) && cfg->interlaced) { >>> >>> Nitpicking, writing the condition as >>> >>> if (cfg->interlaced && !(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL))) >> >> Done. >> >>> would match the comment better. You can also drop the parentheses around >>> the vsp1_feature() call. >>> >>>> + /* >>>> + * Interlaced support requires extended display lists to >>>> + * provide the auto-fld feature with the DU. >>>> + */ >>>> + dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "Interlaced unsupported on this output\n"); >>> >>> Could we catch this in the DU driver to fail atomic test ? >> >> Ugh - I thought moving the configuration to vsp1_du_setup_lif() would >> give us this, but that return value is not checked in the DU. >> >> How can we interogate the VSP1 to ask it if it supports interlaced from >> rcar_du_vsp_plane_atomic_check()? >> >> >> Some dummy call to vsp1_du_setup_lif() to check the return value ? Or >> should we implement a hook to call through to perform checks in the VSP1 >> DRM API? > > Would it be possible to just infer that from the DU compatible string, without > querying the VSP driver ? Of course that's a bit of a layering violation, but > as we know what type of VSP instance is present in each SoC, such a small hack > wouldn't hurt in my opinion. If the need arises later we can introduce an API > to query the information from the VSP driver. I'm not sure what there is to match on currently. I thought that we had restrictions on which display pipelines supported interlaced. (i.e. D3/E3 might not) - but they seem to support extended display lists ... So isn't it the case that any pipeline which we connect to DRM supports interlaced? (currently) - we can't / don't physically connect other VSP entities to the DRM pipes... > >>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>> + } >>>> + >>>> + rpf->interlaced = cfg->interlaced; >>>> + >>>> rpf->fmtinfo = fmtinfo; >>>> rpf->format.num_planes = fmtinfo->planes; >>>> rpf->format.plane_fmt[0].bytesperline = cfg->pitch; > > [snip]
Hi Kieran, On Tuesday, 17 July 2018 19:08:44 EEST Kieran Bingham wrote: > On 17/07/18 13:52, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Monday, 16 July 2018 21:21:00 EEST Kieran Bingham wrote: > >> On 24/05/18 13:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> On Thursday, 3 May 2018 16:36:21 EEST Kieran Bingham wrote: > >>>> Calculate the top and bottom fields for the interlaced frames and > >>>> utilise the extended display list command feature to implement the > >>>> auto-field operations. This allows the DU to update the VSP2 registers > >>>> dynamically based upon the currently processing field. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> > >>>> > >>>> --- > >>>> > >>>> v3: > >>>> - Pass DL through partition calls to allow autocmd's to be retrieved > >>>> - Document interlaced field in struct vsp1_du_atomic_config > >>>> > >>>> v2: > >>>> - fix erroneous BIT value which enabled interlaced > >>>> - fix field handling at frame_end interrupt > >>>> > >>>> --- > >>>> > >>>> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c | 10 ++++- > >>>> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c | 11 ++++- > >>>> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h | 1 +- > >>>> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- > >>>> drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h | 1 +- > >>>> include/media/vsp1.h | 2 +- > >>>> 6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > [snip] > > > >>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c > >>>> b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c index > >>>> 2c3db8b8adce..cc29c9d96bb7 > >>>> 100644 > >>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c > >>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c > >>>> @@ -811,6 +811,17 @@ int vsp1_du_atomic_update(struct device *dev, > >>>> unsigned int pipe_index, > >>>> return -EINVAL; > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> + if (!(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL)) && cfg->interlaced) { > >>> > >>> Nitpicking, writing the condition as > >>> > >>> if (cfg->interlaced && !(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL))) > >> > >> Done. > >> > >>> would match the comment better. You can also drop the parentheses around > >>> the vsp1_feature() call. > >>> > >>>> + /* > >>>> + * Interlaced support requires extended display lists to > >>>> + * provide the auto-fld feature with the DU. > >>>> + */ > >>>> + dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "Interlaced unsupported on this output\n"); > >>> > >>> Could we catch this in the DU driver to fail atomic test ? > >> > >> Ugh - I thought moving the configuration to vsp1_du_setup_lif() would > >> give us this, but that return value is not checked in the DU. > >> > >> How can we interogate the VSP1 to ask it if it supports interlaced from > >> rcar_du_vsp_plane_atomic_check()? > >> > >> Some dummy call to vsp1_du_setup_lif() to check the return value ? Or > >> should we implement a hook to call through to perform checks in the VSP1 > >> DRM API? > > > > Would it be possible to just infer that from the DU compatible string, > > without querying the VSP driver ? Of course that's a bit of a layering > > violation, but as we know what type of VSP instance is present in each > > SoC, such a small hack wouldn't hurt in my opinion. If the need arises > > later we can introduce an API to query the information from the VSP > > driver. > > I'm not sure what there is to match on currently. > > I thought that we had restrictions on which display pipelines supported > interlaced. (i.e. D3/E3 might not) - but they seem to support extended > display lists ... > > So isn't it the case that any pipeline which we connect to DRM supports > interlaced? (currently) - we can't / don't physically connect other VSP > entities to the DRM pipes... I haven't checked, but if you think that's the case, I'll trust you :-) > >>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + rpf->interlaced = cfg->interlaced; > >>>> + > >>>> rpf->fmtinfo = fmtinfo; > >>>> rpf->format.num_planes = fmtinfo->planes; > >>>> rpf->format.plane_fmt[0].bytesperline = cfg->pitch; > > > > [snip]
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c index d33ae5f125bd..bbe9f3006f71 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c @@ -906,6 +906,8 @@ void vsp1_dl_list_commit(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl, bool internal) */ unsigned int vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm) { + struct vsp1_device *vsp1 = dlm->vsp1; + u32 status = vsp1_read(vsp1, VI6_STATUS); unsigned int flags = 0; spin_lock(&dlm->lock); @@ -931,6 +933,14 @@ unsigned int vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm) goto done; /* + * Progressive streams report only TOP fields. If we have a BOTTOM + * field, we are interlaced, and expect the frame to complete on the + * next frame end interrupt. + */ + if (status & VI6_STATUS_FLD_STD(dlm->index)) + goto done; + + /* * The device starts processing the queued display list right after the * frame end interrupt. The display list thus becomes active. */ diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c index 2c3db8b8adce..cc29c9d96bb7 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c @@ -811,6 +811,17 @@ int vsp1_du_atomic_update(struct device *dev, unsigned int pipe_index, return -EINVAL; } + if (!(vsp1_feature(vsp1, VSP1_HAS_EXT_DL)) && cfg->interlaced) { + /* + * Interlaced support requires extended display lists to + * provide the auto-fld feature with the DU. + */ + dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "Interlaced unsupported on this output\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + rpf->interlaced = cfg->interlaced; + rpf->fmtinfo = fmtinfo; rpf->format.num_planes = fmtinfo->planes; rpf->format.plane_fmt[0].bytesperline = cfg->pitch; diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h index d054767570c1..a2ac65cc5155 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ #define VI6_SRESET_SRTS(n) (1 << (n)) #define VI6_STATUS 0x0038 +#define VI6_STATUS_FLD_STD(n) (1 << ((n) + 28)) #define VI6_STATUS_SYS_ACT(n) (1 << ((n) + 8)) #define VI6_WPF_IRQ_ENB(n) (0x0048 + (n) * 12) diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c index 8fae7c485642..511b2e127820 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c @@ -20,6 +20,20 @@ #define RPF_MAX_WIDTH 8190 #define RPF_MAX_HEIGHT 8190 +/* Pre extended display list command data structure */ +struct vsp1_extcmd_auto_fld_body { + u32 top_y0; + u32 bottom_y0; + u32 top_c0; + u32 bottom_c0; + u32 top_c1; + u32 bottom_c1; + u32 reserved0; + u32 reserved1; +} __packed; + +#define VSP1_DL_EXT_AUTOFLD_INT BIT(0) + /* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Device Access */ @@ -64,6 +78,14 @@ static void rpf_configure_stream(struct vsp1_entity *entity, pstride |= format->plane_fmt[1].bytesperline << VI6_RPF_SRCM_PSTRIDE_C_SHIFT; + /* + * pstride has both STRIDE_Y and STRIDE_C, but multiplying the whole + * of pstride by 2 is conveniently OK here as we are multiplying both + * values. + */ + if (rpf->interlaced) + pstride *= 2; + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_PSTRIDE, pstride); /* Format */ @@ -100,6 +122,9 @@ static void rpf_configure_stream(struct vsp1_entity *entity, top = compose->top; } + if (rpf->interlaced) + top /= 2; + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_LOC, (left << VI6_RPF_LOC_HCOORD_SHIFT) | (top << VI6_RPF_LOC_VCOORD_SHIFT)); @@ -169,6 +194,31 @@ static void rpf_configure_stream(struct vsp1_entity *entity, } +static void vsp1_rpf_configure_autofld(struct vsp1_rwpf *rpf, + struct vsp1_dl_ext_cmd *cmd) +{ + const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *format = &rpf->format; + struct vsp1_extcmd_auto_fld_body *auto_fld = cmd->data; + u32 offset_y, offset_c; + + /* Re-index our auto_fld to match the current RPF */ + auto_fld = &auto_fld[rpf->entity.index]; + + auto_fld->top_y0 = rpf->mem.addr[0]; + auto_fld->top_c0 = rpf->mem.addr[1]; + auto_fld->top_c1 = rpf->mem.addr[2]; + + offset_y = format->plane_fmt[0].bytesperline; + offset_c = format->plane_fmt[1].bytesperline; + + auto_fld->bottom_y0 = rpf->mem.addr[0] + offset_y; + auto_fld->bottom_c0 = rpf->mem.addr[1] + offset_c; + auto_fld->bottom_c1 = rpf->mem.addr[2] + offset_c; + + cmd->flags |= VSP1_DL_EXT_AUTOFLD_INT; + cmd->flags |= BIT(16 + rpf->entity.index); +} + static void rpf_configure_frame(struct vsp1_entity *entity, struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe, struct vsp1_dl_list *dl, @@ -192,6 +242,7 @@ static void rpf_configure_partition(struct vsp1_entity *entity, struct vsp1_rwpf *rpf = to_rwpf(&entity->subdev); struct vsp1_rwpf_memory mem = rpf->mem; struct vsp1_device *vsp1 = rpf->entity.vsp1; + struct vsp1_dl_ext_cmd *cmd; const struct vsp1_format_info *fmtinfo = rpf->fmtinfo; const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *format = &rpf->format; struct v4l2_rect crop; @@ -220,6 +271,11 @@ static void rpf_configure_partition(struct vsp1_entity *entity, crop.left += pipe->partition->rpf.left; } + if (rpf->interlaced) { + crop.height = round_down(crop.height / 2, fmtinfo->vsub); + crop.top = round_down(crop.top / 2, fmtinfo->vsub); + } + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRC_BSIZE, (crop.width << VI6_RPF_SRC_BSIZE_BHSIZE_SHIFT) | (crop.height << VI6_RPF_SRC_BSIZE_BVSIZE_SHIFT)); @@ -248,9 +304,18 @@ static void rpf_configure_partition(struct vsp1_entity *entity, fmtinfo->swap_uv) swap(mem.addr[1], mem.addr[2]); - vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_Y, mem.addr[0]); - vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C0, mem.addr[1]); - vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C1, mem.addr[2]); + /* + * Interlaced pipelines will use the extended pre-cmd to process + * SRCM_ADDR_{Y,C0,C1} + */ + if (rpf->interlaced) { + cmd = vsp1_dlm_get_autofld_cmd(dl); + vsp1_rpf_configure_autofld(rpf, cmd); + } else { + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_Y, mem.addr[0]); + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C0, mem.addr[1]); + vsp1_rpf_write(rpf, dlb, VI6_RPF_SRCM_ADDR_C1, mem.addr[2]); + } } static void rpf_partition(struct vsp1_entity *entity, diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h index 70742ecf766f..8d6e42f27908 100644 --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct vsp1_rwpf { struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane format; const struct vsp1_format_info *fmtinfo; unsigned int brx_input; + bool interlaced; unsigned int alpha; diff --git a/include/media/vsp1.h b/include/media/vsp1.h index 678c24de1ac6..c10883f30980 100644 --- a/include/media/vsp1.h +++ b/include/media/vsp1.h @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ int vsp1_du_setup_lif(struct device *dev, unsigned int pipe_index, * @dst: destination rectangle on the display (integer coordinates) * @alpha: alpha value (0: fully transparent, 255: fully opaque) * @zpos: Z position of the plane (from 0 to number of planes minus 1) + * @interlaced: true for interlaced pipelines */ struct vsp1_du_atomic_config { u32 pixelformat; @@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ struct vsp1_du_atomic_config { struct v4l2_rect dst; unsigned int alpha; unsigned int zpos; + bool interlaced; }; /**
Calculate the top and bottom fields for the interlaced frames and utilise the extended display list command feature to implement the auto-field operations. This allows the DU to update the VSP2 registers dynamically based upon the currently processing field. Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> --- v3: - Pass DL through partition calls to allow autocmd's to be retrieved - Document interlaced field in struct vsp1_du_atomic_config v2: - fix erroneous BIT value which enabled interlaced - fix field handling at frame_end interrupt --- drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c | 10 ++++- drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c | 11 ++++- drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_regs.h | 1 +- drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rwpf.h | 1 +- include/media/vsp1.h | 2 +- 6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)