diff mbox

[03/10] atmel: hide unused procfs helpers

Message ID 20180713064658.10340-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 8b8f3278d241658a7dcb95cefc9793ac85a43c3a
Delegated to: Kalle Valo
Headers show

Commit Message

Yue Haibing July 13, 2018, 6:46 a.m. UTC
When CONFIG_PROC_FS isn't set, gcc warning this:

drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c:1402:12: warning: ‘atmel_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
            ^
fix this by adding #ifdef around it.

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Yue Haibing July 13, 2018, 9:31 a.m. UTC | #1
pls ignore this,my bad.

On 2018/7/13 14:46, YueHaibing wrote:
> When CONFIG_PROC_FS isn't set, gcc warning this:
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c:1402:12: warning: ‘atmel_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>             ^
> fix this by adding #ifdef around it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c b/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c
> index b01dc34..3940876 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c
> @@ -1399,6 +1399,7 @@ static int atmel_validate_channel(struct atmel_private *priv, int channel)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>  static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  {
>  	struct atmel_private *priv = m->private;
> @@ -1481,6 +1482,7 @@ static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>  	seq_printf(m, "Current state:\t\t%s\n", s);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +#endif
>  
>  static const struct net_device_ops atmel_netdev_ops = {
>  	.ndo_open 		= atmel_open,
>
Kalle Valo July 27, 2018, 9:24 a.m. UTC | #2
(fixing top posting)

YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> writes:

> On 2018/7/13 14:46, YueHaibing wrote:
>> When CONFIG_PROC_FS isn't set, gcc warning this:
>> 
>> drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c:1402:12: warning: ‘atmel_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>  static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>>             ^
>> fix this by adding #ifdef around it.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>
> pls ignore this,my bad.

Why should I drop this? Does the patch have something wrong which I'm
missing?

I'm asking because I prefer this over Randy's version:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10512913/
Yue Haibing July 27, 2018, 10:02 a.m. UTC | #3
On 2018/7/27 17:24, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (fixing top posting)
> 
> YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> writes:
> 
>> On 2018/7/13 14:46, YueHaibing wrote:
>>> When CONFIG_PROC_FS isn't set, gcc warning this:
>>>
>>> drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c:1402:12: warning: ‘atmel_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>>  static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>>>             ^
>>> fix this by adding #ifdef around it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>>
>> pls ignore this,my bad.
> 
> Why should I drop this? Does the patch have something wrong which I'm
> missing?

No,the patch is ok,just because I find this issue has a fix patch from Randy.

> 
> I'm asking because I prefer this over Randy's version:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10512913/
>
Randy Dunlap July 27, 2018, 3:44 p.m. UTC | #4
On 07/27/2018 02:24 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (fixing top posting)
> 
> YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> writes:
> 
>> On 2018/7/13 14:46, YueHaibing wrote:
>>> When CONFIG_PROC_FS isn't set, gcc warning this:
>>>
>>> drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c:1402:12: warning: ‘atmel_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>>>  static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>>>             ^
>>> fix this by adding #ifdef around it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
>>
>> pls ignore this,my bad.
> 
> Why should I drop this? Does the patch have something wrong which I'm
> missing?
> 
> I'm asking because I prefer this over Randy's version:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10512913/

Take it.  I don't mind.
Kalle Valo July 31, 2018, 7:21 a.m. UTC | #5
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> wrote:

> When CONFIG_PROC_FS isn't set, gcc warning this:
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c:1402:12: warning: ‘atmel_proc_show’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
>             ^
> fix this by adding #ifdef around it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

8b8f3278d241 atmel: hide unused procfs helpers
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c b/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c
index b01dc34..3940876 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/atmel/atmel.c
@@ -1399,6 +1399,7 @@  static int atmel_validate_channel(struct atmel_private *priv, int channel)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
 	struct atmel_private *priv = m->private;
@@ -1481,6 +1482,7 @@  static int atmel_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 	seq_printf(m, "Current state:\t\t%s\n", s);
 	return 0;
 }
+#endif
 
 static const struct net_device_ops atmel_netdev_ops = {
 	.ndo_open 		= atmel_open,