| Message ID | 20180815171035.GA17360@embeddedor.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | pinctrl: lpc18xx: mark expected switch fall-throughs | expand |
On 08/15/2018 08:10 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292308 ("Missing break in switch") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292309 ("Missing break in switch") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1309546 ("Missing break in switch") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357369 ("Missing break in switch") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357389 ("Missing break in switch") > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> > --- > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c > index 190f17e..a14bc5e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c > @@ -844,8 +844,11 @@ static int lpc18xx_pconf_get_pin(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned param, > *arg = (reg & LPC18XX_SCU_PIN_EHD_MASK) >> LPC18XX_SCU_PIN_EHD_POS; > switch (*arg) { > case 3: *arg += 5; > + /* fall through */ > case 2: *arg += 5; > + /* fall through */ > case 1: *arg += 3; > + /* fall through */ > case 0: *arg += 4; > } > break; > @@ -1060,8 +1063,11 @@ static int lpc18xx_pconf_set_pin(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned param, > > switch (param_val) { > case 20: param_val -= 5; > + /* fall through */ > case 14: param_val -= 5; > + /* fall through */ > case 8: param_val -= 3; > + /* fall through */ > case 4: param_val -= 4; > break; > default: > The code snippets are about a mind-blowing hyper-optimization, but I took it as a chance to verify the correctness, and there are no issues found. Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> -- Best wishes, Vladimir
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:10 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292308 ("Missing break in switch") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292309 ("Missing break in switch") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1309546 ("Missing break in switch") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357369 ("Missing break in switch") > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357389 ("Missing break in switch") > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Patch applied. Yours, Linus Walleij
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c index 190f17e..a14bc5e 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c @@ -844,8 +844,11 @@ static int lpc18xx_pconf_get_pin(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned param, *arg = (reg & LPC18XX_SCU_PIN_EHD_MASK) >> LPC18XX_SCU_PIN_EHD_POS; switch (*arg) { case 3: *arg += 5; + /* fall through */ case 2: *arg += 5; + /* fall through */ case 1: *arg += 3; + /* fall through */ case 0: *arg += 4; } break; @@ -1060,8 +1063,11 @@ static int lpc18xx_pconf_set_pin(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned param, switch (param_val) { case 20: param_val -= 5; + /* fall through */ case 14: param_val -= 5; + /* fall through */ case 8: param_val -= 3; + /* fall through */ case 4: param_val -= 4; break; default:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292308 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1292309 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1309546 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357369 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357389 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)