diff mbox series

[1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: document Broadcom Northstar pin mux controller

Message ID 20180919210219.21921-1-zajec5@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: document Broadcom Northstar pin mux controller | expand

Commit Message

Rafał Miłecki Sept. 19, 2018, 9:02 p.m. UTC
From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

Northstar has mux controller just like Northstar Plus and Northstar2.
It's a bit different though (different registers & pins) so it requires
its own binding.

It's needed to allow other block bindings specify required mux setup.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt

Comments

Florian Fainelli Sept. 19, 2018, 9:21 p.m. UTC | #1
On 09/19/2018 02:02 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> Northstar has mux controller just like Northstar Plus and Northstar2.
> It's a bit different though (different registers & pins) so it requires
> its own binding.
> 
> It's needed to allow other block bindings specify required mux setup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0e913721ae9e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +Broadcom Northstar pins mux controller
> +
> +Some of Northstar SoCs's pins can be used for various purposes thanks to the mux
> +controller. This binding allows describing mux controller and listing available
> +functions. They can be referenced later by other bindings to let system
> +configure controller correctly.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: brcm,ns-pinmux
> +- reg: iomem address range of CRU (Central Resource Unit) pin registers
> +- reg-names: "cru_pins_control" - the only needed & supported reg right now

Technically the register range that you cover is named CRU_GPIO_CONTROLx
with x being in [0-8].

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Rafał Miłecki Sept. 20, 2018, 4:59 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:22, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/19/2018 02:02 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> >
> > Northstar has mux controller just like Northstar Plus and Northstar2.
> > It's a bit different though (different registers & pins) so it requires
> > its own binding.
> >
> > It's needed to allow other block bindings specify required mux setup.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..0e913721ae9e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> > +Broadcom Northstar pins mux controller
> > +
> > +Some of Northstar SoCs's pins can be used for various purposes thanks to the mux
> > +controller. This binding allows describing mux controller and listing available
> > +functions. They can be referenced later by other bindings to let system
> > +configure controller correctly.
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: brcm,ns-pinmux
> > +- reg: iomem address range of CRU (Central Resource Unit) pin registers
> > +- reg-names: "cru_pins_control" - the only needed & supported reg right now
>
> Technically the register range that you cover is named CRU_GPIO_CONTROLx
> with x being in [0-8].

Thanks! Do you think
reg-names: "cru_gpio_controls"
will be fine? Or should I keep it singular like:
reg-names: "cru_gpio_control"
?
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0e913721ae9e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/brcm,ns-pinmux.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ 
+Broadcom Northstar pins mux controller
+
+Some of Northstar SoCs's pins can be used for various purposes thanks to the mux
+controller. This binding allows describing mux controller and listing available
+functions. They can be referenced later by other bindings to let system
+configure controller correctly.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: brcm,ns-pinmux
+- reg: iomem address range of CRU (Central Resource Unit) pin registers
+- reg-names: "cru_pins_control" - the only needed & supported reg right now
+
+List of supported functions and their groups:
+- "spi": "spi_grp"
+
+For documentation of subnodes see:
+Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
+
+Example:
+	pinctrl@1800c1c0 {
+		compatible = "brcm,ns-pinmux";
+		reg = <0x1800c1c0 0x24>;
+		reg-names = "cru_pins_control";
+
+		spi {
+			function = "spi";
+			groups = "spi_grp";
+		};
+	};