Message ID | b2e0ee49788bfbf2182df7a93694333568552962.1537542323.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Properly peel tags in can_all_from_reach_with_flags() | expand |
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 08:05:27AM -0700, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote: > From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> > > The can_all_from_reach_with_flag() method uses 'assign_flag' as a > value we can use to mark objects temporarily during our commit walk. > The intent is that these flags are removed from all objects before > returning. However, this is not the case. > > The 'from' array could also contain objects that are not commits, and > we mark those objects with 'assign_flag'. Add a loop to the 'cleanup' > section that removes these markers. > > Also, we forgot to free() the memory for 'list', so add that to the > 'cleanup' section. Urgh, ignore most of my response to patch 1, then. I saw there was a patch 2, but thought it was just handling the free(). The flag-clearing here makes perfect sense. -Peff
On 9/21/2018 7:58 PM, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 08:05:27AM -0700, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote: > >> From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> >> >> The can_all_from_reach_with_flag() method uses 'assign_flag' as a >> value we can use to mark objects temporarily during our commit walk. >> The intent is that these flags are removed from all objects before >> returning. However, this is not the case. >> >> The 'from' array could also contain objects that are not commits, and >> we mark those objects with 'assign_flag'. Add a loop to the 'cleanup' >> section that removes these markers. >> >> Also, we forgot to free() the memory for 'list', so add that to the >> 'cleanup' section. > Urgh, ignore most of my response to patch 1, then. I saw there was a > patch 2, but thought it was just handling the free(). > > The flag-clearing here makes perfect sense. In my local branch, I ended up squashing this commit into the previous, because I discovered clear_commit_marks_many() making the cleanup section have this diff: @@ -600,10 +622,12 @@ int can_all_from_reach_with_flag(struct object_array *from, } cleanup: - for (i = 0; i < from->nr; i++) { - clear_commit_marks(list[i], RESULT); - clear_commit_marks(list[i], assign_flag); - } + clear_commit_marks_many(nr_commits, list, RESULT | assign_flag); + free(list); + + for (i = 0; i < from->nr; i++) + from->objects[i].item->flags &= ~assign_flag; + return result; } With the bigger change in the larger set, there is less reason to do separate commits. (Plus, it confused you during review.) Thanks, -Stolee
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 01:25:12PM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote: > On 9/21/2018 7:58 PM, Jeff King wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 08:05:27AM -0700, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote: > > > > > From: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> > > > > > > The can_all_from_reach_with_flag() method uses 'assign_flag' as a > > > value we can use to mark objects temporarily during our commit walk. > > > The intent is that these flags are removed from all objects before > > > returning. However, this is not the case. > > > > > > The 'from' array could also contain objects that are not commits, and > > > we mark those objects with 'assign_flag'. Add a loop to the 'cleanup' > > > section that removes these markers. > > > > > > Also, we forgot to free() the memory for 'list', so add that to the > > > 'cleanup' section. > > Urgh, ignore most of my response to patch 1, then. I saw there was a > > patch 2, but thought it was just handling the free(). > > > > The flag-clearing here makes perfect sense. > > In my local branch, I ended up squashing this commit into the previous, > because I discovered clear_commit_marks_many() making the cleanup section > have this diff: > > @@ -600,10 +622,12 @@ int can_all_from_reach_with_flag(struct object_array > *from, > } > > cleanup: > - for (i = 0; i < from->nr; i++) { > - clear_commit_marks(list[i], RESULT); > - clear_commit_marks(list[i], assign_flag); > - } > + clear_commit_marks_many(nr_commits, list, RESULT | assign_flag); > + free(list); > + > + for (i = 0; i < from->nr; i++) > + from->objects[i].item->flags &= ~assign_flag; > + > return result; > } > > With the bigger change in the larger set, there is less reason to do > separate commits. (Plus, it confused you during review.) Yeah, that looks better still. Thanks! -Peff
diff --git a/commit-reach.c b/commit-reach.c index e748414d04..5a845440a9 100644 --- a/commit-reach.c +++ b/commit-reach.c @@ -626,6 +626,11 @@ cleanup: clear_commit_marks(list[i], RESULT); clear_commit_marks(list[i], assign_flag); } + free(list); + + for (i = 0; i < from->nr; i++) + from->objects[i].item->flags &= ~assign_flag; + return result; }