Message ID | 20181005100903.GA32057@embeddedor.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show |
Series | mmc: meson-mx-sdio: mark expected switch fall-through | expand |
On 5 October 2018 at 12:09, Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:" > comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is > expecting to find. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch") > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Applied for next, thanks! Kind regards Uffe > --- > drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c > index 2cfec33..abe253c 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c > @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void meson_mx_mmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios) > switch (ios->power_mode) { > case MMC_POWER_OFF: > vdd = 0; > - /* fall-through: */ > + /* fall through */ > case MMC_POWER_UP: > if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) { > host->error = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc, > -- > 2.7.4 >
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:15 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote: > > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:" > comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is > expecting to find. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch") > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> thank you for taking care of this! Regards Martin
Hi Martin, On 10/5/18 11:10 PM, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:15 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva > <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote: >> >> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases >> where we are expecting to fall through. >> >> Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:" >> comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is >> expecting to find. >> >> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch") >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> > Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > > thank you for taking care of this! > Glad to help. :) Thanks -- Gustavo
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c index 2cfec33..abe253c 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static void meson_mx_mmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios) switch (ios->power_mode) { case MMC_POWER_OFF: vdd = 0; - /* fall-through: */ + /* fall through */ case MMC_POWER_UP: if (!IS_ERR(mmc->supply.vmmc)) { host->error = mmc_regulator_set_ocr(mmc,
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:" comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> --- drivers/mmc/host/meson-mx-sdio.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)