Message ID | 20181010143306.2051406-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | kdump, proc/vmcore: fix building without CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT | expand |
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > We get a link failure when calling copy_oldmem_page_encrypted() > when the compiler fails to do constant-propagation of the > sme_active() result into read_from_oldmem: > > fs/proc/vmcore.o: In function `read_from_oldmem.part.0': > vmcore.c:(.text+0xb7): undefined reference to `copy_oldmem_page_encrypted' > > Adding an IS_ENABLED() check means the compiler will always > know when it cannot be enabled. > > Fixes: 992b649a3f01 ("kdump, proc/vmcore: Enable kdumping encrypted memory with SME enabled") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > There may be a better way of doing this, not sure what kinds > of assumptions we want to make here. > --- > fs/proc/vmcore.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c > index d469ce9d8c0c..92e1e520a52d 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c > +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c > @@ -123,7 +123,9 @@ static ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size_t count, > if (pfn_is_ram(pfn) == 0) > memset(buf, 0, nr_bytes); > else { > - if (encrypted) > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && > + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT) && > + encrypted) > tmp = copy_oldmem_page_encrypted(pfn, buf, > nr_bytes, > offset, > -- Doesn't that fix it? https://git.kernel.org/tip/cf089611f4c446285046fcd426d90c18f37d2905
On 10/10/18, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> We get a link failure when calling copy_oldmem_page_encrypted() >> when the compiler fails to do constant-propagation of the >> sme_active() result into read_from_oldmem: >> >> fs/proc/vmcore.o: In function `read_from_oldmem.part.0': >> vmcore.c:(.text+0xb7): undefined reference to >> `copy_oldmem_page_encrypted' >> >> Adding an IS_ENABLED() check means the compiler will always >> know when it cannot be enabled. >> >> Fixes: 992b649a3f01 ("kdump, proc/vmcore: Enable kdumping encrypted memory >> with SME enabled") >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> --- >> There may be a better way of doing this, not sure what kinds >> of assumptions we want to make here. >> --- >> fs/proc/vmcore.c | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c >> index d469ce9d8c0c..92e1e520a52d 100644 >> --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c >> +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c >> @@ -123,7 +123,9 @@ static ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size_t >> count, >> if (pfn_is_ram(pfn) == 0) >> memset(buf, 0, nr_bytes); >> else { >> - if (encrypted) >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && >> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT) && >> + encrypted) >> tmp = copy_oldmem_page_encrypted(pfn, buf, >> nr_bytes, >> offset, >> -- > > Doesn't that fix it? > > https://git.kernel.org/tip/cf089611f4c446285046fcd426d90c18f37d2905 Sorry, my mistake. I noticed this patch was still in my queue and not marked as 'submitted'. I forgot we had already discussed it. Arnd
diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c index d469ce9d8c0c..92e1e520a52d 100644 --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c @@ -123,7 +123,9 @@ static ssize_t read_from_oldmem(char *buf, size_t count, if (pfn_is_ram(pfn) == 0) memset(buf, 0, nr_bytes); else { - if (encrypted) + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPT) && + encrypted) tmp = copy_oldmem_page_encrypted(pfn, buf, nr_bytes, offset,
We get a link failure when calling copy_oldmem_page_encrypted() when the compiler fails to do constant-propagation of the sme_active() result into read_from_oldmem: fs/proc/vmcore.o: In function `read_from_oldmem.part.0': vmcore.c:(.text+0xb7): undefined reference to `copy_oldmem_page_encrypted' Adding an IS_ENABLED() check means the compiler will always know when it cannot be enabled. Fixes: 992b649a3f01 ("kdump, proc/vmcore: Enable kdumping encrypted memory with SME enabled") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- There may be a better way of doing this, not sure what kinds of assumptions we want to make here. --- fs/proc/vmcore.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)