Message ID | 20181127034254.24721-5-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Mediatek MT8183 clock and scpsys support | expand |
Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> 於 2018年11月26日 週一 下午7:45寫道: > > From: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com> > > PLLs with tuner_en bit, such as APLL1, need to disable > tuner_en before apply new frequency settings, or the new frequency > settings (pcw) will not be applied. > The tuner_en bit will be disabled during changing PLL rate > and be restored after new settings applied. It looks like a bug fix. If so, you should add a fixes tag and even cc stable tree > > Signed-off-by: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com> > --- > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c > index 1db161aced31..81400601f107 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > #define CON0_BASE_EN BIT(0) > #define CON0_PWR_ON BIT(0) > #define CON0_ISO_EN BIT(1) > -#define CON0_PCW_CHG BIT(31) > +#define CON1_PCW_CHG BIT(31) it seems like an unnecessary change > > #define AUDPLL_TUNER_EN BIT(31) > > @@ -97,9 +97,31 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw, > { > u32 con1, val; > int pll_en; > + u32 tuner_en = 0; > + u32 tuner_en_mask; > + void __iomem *tuner_en_addr = NULL; > > pll_en = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON0) & CON0_BASE_EN; > > + /* disable tuner */ similar code pieces are ready on mtk_pll_[un]prepare. maybe we can add common tuner operations for them to reuse. > + if (pll->tuner_en_addr) { > + tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_en_addr; > + tuner_en_mask = BIT(pll->data->tuner_en_bit); > + } else if (pll->tuner_addr) { > + tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_addr; > + tuner_en_mask = AUDPLL_TUNER_EN; > + } > + > + if (tuner_en_addr) { > + val = readl(tuner_en_addr); > + tuner_en = val & tuner_en_mask; > + > + if (tuner_en) { > + val &= ~tuner_en_mask; > + writel(val, tuner_en_addr); > + } > + } > + > /* set postdiv */ > val = readl(pll->pd_addr); > val &= ~(POSTDIV_MASK << pll->data->pd_shift); > @@ -120,12 +142,19 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw, > con1 = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON1); > > if (pll_en) > - con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG; > + con1 |= CON1_PCW_CHG; > > writel(con1, pll->base_addr + REG_CON1); > if (pll->tuner_addr) > writel(con1 + 1, pll->tuner_addr); > > + /* restore tuner_en */ > + if (tuner_en_addr && tuner_en) { if (tuner_en) is sufficient > + val = readl(tuner_en_addr); > + val |= tuner_en_mask; > + writel(val, tuner_en_addr); > + } > + > if (pll_en) > udelay(20); > } > -- > 2.18.0 > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 4:37 AM Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org> wrote: > > Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> 於 2018年11月26日 週一 下午7:45寫道: > > > > From: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com> > > > > PLLs with tuner_en bit, such as APLL1, need to disable > > tuner_en before apply new frequency settings, or the new frequency > > settings (pcw) will not be applied. > > The tuner_en bit will be disabled during changing PLL rate > > and be restored after new settings applied. > > It looks like a bug fix. If so, you should add a fixes tag and even cc > stable tree > > > > > Signed-off-by: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com> > > --- > > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c > > index 1db161aced31..81400601f107 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > > #define CON0_BASE_EN BIT(0) > > #define CON0_PWR_ON BIT(0) > > #define CON0_ISO_EN BIT(1) > > -#define CON0_PCW_CHG BIT(31) > > +#define CON1_PCW_CHG BIT(31) > > it seems like an unnecessary change Below, you have: con1 |= CON1_PCW_CHG; Presumably PCW_CHG is on BIT(31) of CON1(?), so I think this is a good change. Maybe this needs to be a separate patch, though? > > > > #define AUDPLL_TUNER_EN BIT(31) > > > > @@ -97,9 +97,31 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw, > > { > > u32 con1, val; > > int pll_en; > > + u32 tuner_en = 0; > > + u32 tuner_en_mask; > > + void __iomem *tuner_en_addr = NULL; > > > > pll_en = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON0) & CON0_BASE_EN; > > > > + /* disable tuner */ > > similar code pieces are ready on mtk_pll_[un]prepare. maybe we can add > common tuner operations for them to reuse. > > > + if (pll->tuner_en_addr) { > > + tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_en_addr; > > + tuner_en_mask = BIT(pll->data->tuner_en_bit); > > + } else if (pll->tuner_addr) { > > + tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_addr; > > + tuner_en_mask = AUDPLL_TUNER_EN; > > + } > > + > > + if (tuner_en_addr) { > > + val = readl(tuner_en_addr); > > + tuner_en = val & tuner_en_mask; > > + > > + if (tuner_en) { > > + val &= ~tuner_en_mask; > > + writel(val, tuner_en_addr); > > + } > > + } > > + > > /* set postdiv */ > > val = readl(pll->pd_addr); > > val &= ~(POSTDIV_MASK << pll->data->pd_shift); > > @@ -120,12 +142,19 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw, > > con1 = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON1); > > > > if (pll_en) > > - con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG; > > + con1 |= CON1_PCW_CHG; > > > > writel(con1, pll->base_addr + REG_CON1); > > if (pll->tuner_addr) > > writel(con1 + 1, pll->tuner_addr); > > > > + /* restore tuner_en */ > > + if (tuner_en_addr && tuner_en) { > > if (tuner_en) is sufficient > > > + val = readl(tuner_en_addr); > > + val |= tuner_en_mask; > > + writel(val, tuner_en_addr); > > + } > > + > > if (pll_en) > > udelay(20); > > } > > -- > > 2.18.0 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-mediatek mailing list > > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 4:37 AM Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> 於 2018年11月26日 週一 下午7:45寫道: > > > > > > From: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com> > > > > > > PLLs with tuner_en bit, such as APLL1, need to disable > > > tuner_en before apply new frequency settings, or the new frequency > > > settings (pcw) will not be applied. > > > The tuner_en bit will be disabled during changing PLL rate > > > and be restored after new settings applied. > > > > It looks like a bug fix. If so, you should add a fixes tag and even cc > > stable tree > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c > > > index 1db161aced31..81400601f107 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c > > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ > > > #define CON0_BASE_EN BIT(0) > > > #define CON0_PWR_ON BIT(0) > > > #define CON0_ISO_EN BIT(1) > > > -#define CON0_PCW_CHG BIT(31) > > > +#define CON1_PCW_CHG BIT(31) > > > > it seems like an unnecessary change > > Below, you have: > con1 |= CON1_PCW_CHG; > > Presumably PCW_CHG is on BIT(31) of CON1(?), so I think this is a good > change. Maybe this needs to be a separate patch, though? > Sure, for me it's not easily understood why the change is necessary from the description. If it's really another fixup, it should be moved to a separate patch or add more explanations about that in the same patch. > > > > > > #define AUDPLL_TUNER_EN BIT(31) > > > > > > @@ -97,9 +97,31 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw, > > > { > > > u32 con1, val; > > > int pll_en; > > > + u32 tuner_en = 0; > > > + u32 tuner_en_mask; > > > + void __iomem *tuner_en_addr = NULL; > > > > > > pll_en = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON0) & CON0_BASE_EN; > > > > > > + /* disable tuner */ > > > > similar code pieces are ready on mtk_pll_[un]prepare. maybe we can add > > common tuner operations for them to reuse. > > > > > + if (pll->tuner_en_addr) { > > > + tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_en_addr; > > > + tuner_en_mask = BIT(pll->data->tuner_en_bit); > > > + } else if (pll->tuner_addr) { > > > + tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_addr; > > > + tuner_en_mask = AUDPLL_TUNER_EN; > > > + } > > > + > > > + if (tuner_en_addr) { > > > + val = readl(tuner_en_addr); > > > + tuner_en = val & tuner_en_mask; > > > + > > > + if (tuner_en) { > > > + val &= ~tuner_en_mask; > > > + writel(val, tuner_en_addr); > > > + } > > > + } > > > + > > > /* set postdiv */ > > > val = readl(pll->pd_addr); > > > val &= ~(POSTDIV_MASK << pll->data->pd_shift); > > > @@ -120,12 +142,19 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw, > > > con1 = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON1); > > > > > > if (pll_en) > > > - con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG; > > > + con1 |= CON1_PCW_CHG; > > > > > > writel(con1, pll->base_addr + REG_CON1); > > > if (pll->tuner_addr) > > > writel(con1 + 1, pll->tuner_addr); > > > > > > + /* restore tuner_en */ > > > + if (tuner_en_addr && tuner_en) { > > > > if (tuner_en) is sufficient > > > > > + val = readl(tuner_en_addr); > > > + val |= tuner_en_mask; > > > + writel(val, tuner_en_addr); > > > + } > > > + > > > if (pll_en) > > > udelay(20); > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.18.0 > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Linux-mediatek mailing list > > > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c index 1db161aced31..81400601f107 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ #define CON0_BASE_EN BIT(0) #define CON0_PWR_ON BIT(0) #define CON0_ISO_EN BIT(1) -#define CON0_PCW_CHG BIT(31) +#define CON1_PCW_CHG BIT(31) #define AUDPLL_TUNER_EN BIT(31) @@ -97,9 +97,31 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw, { u32 con1, val; int pll_en; + u32 tuner_en = 0; + u32 tuner_en_mask; + void __iomem *tuner_en_addr = NULL; pll_en = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON0) & CON0_BASE_EN; + /* disable tuner */ + if (pll->tuner_en_addr) { + tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_en_addr; + tuner_en_mask = BIT(pll->data->tuner_en_bit); + } else if (pll->tuner_addr) { + tuner_en_addr = pll->tuner_addr; + tuner_en_mask = AUDPLL_TUNER_EN; + } + + if (tuner_en_addr) { + val = readl(tuner_en_addr); + tuner_en = val & tuner_en_mask; + + if (tuner_en) { + val &= ~tuner_en_mask; + writel(val, tuner_en_addr); + } + } + /* set postdiv */ val = readl(pll->pd_addr); val &= ~(POSTDIV_MASK << pll->data->pd_shift); @@ -120,12 +142,19 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw, con1 = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON1); if (pll_en) - con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG; + con1 |= CON1_PCW_CHG; writel(con1, pll->base_addr + REG_CON1); if (pll->tuner_addr) writel(con1 + 1, pll->tuner_addr); + /* restore tuner_en */ + if (tuner_en_addr && tuner_en) { + val = readl(tuner_en_addr); + val |= tuner_en_mask; + writel(val, tuner_en_addr); + } + if (pll_en) udelay(20); }