Message ID | 20181129055559.159228-6-sashal@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> writes: > From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> > > [ Upstream commit 3401d42c7ea2d064d15c66698ff8eb96553179ce ] > > Previous commit /adding/ support for 160 MHz chanspecs was incomplete. > It didn't set bandwidth info and didn't extract control channel info. As > the result it was also using uninitialized "sb" var. > > This change has been tested for two chanspecs found to be reported by > some devices/firmwares: > 1) 60/160 (0xee32) > Before: chnum:50 control_ch_num:36 > After: chnum:50 control_ch_num:60 > 2) 120/160 (0xed72) > Before: chnum:114 control_ch_num:100 > After: chnum:114 control_ch_num:120 > > Fixes: 330994e8e8ec ("brcmfmac: fix for proper support of 160MHz bandwidth") > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> > Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Please mark your stable patches with: X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore This way patchwork ignores them and this saves my time. Thank you.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 01:49:43PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: >Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> writes: > >> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> >> >> [ Upstream commit 3401d42c7ea2d064d15c66698ff8eb96553179ce ] >> >> Previous commit /adding/ support for 160 MHz chanspecs was incomplete. >> It didn't set bandwidth info and didn't extract control channel info. As >> the result it was also using uninitialized "sb" var. >> >> This change has been tested for two chanspecs found to be reported by >> some devices/firmwares: >> 1) 60/160 (0xee32) >> Before: chnum:50 control_ch_num:36 >> After: chnum:50 control_ch_num:60 >> 2) 120/160 (0xed72) >> Before: chnum:114 control_ch_num:100 >> After: chnum:114 control_ch_num:120 >> >> Fixes: 330994e8e8ec ("brcmfmac: fix for proper support of 160MHz bandwidth") >> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl> >> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> >> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> > >Please mark your stable patches with: > >X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore > >This way patchwork ignores them and this saves my time. Thank you. Will do, thanks! -- Thanks, Sasha
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c index e7584b842dce..eb5db94f5745 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c @@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ static void brcmu_d11ac_decchspec(struct brcmu_chan *ch) } break; case BRCMU_CHSPEC_D11AC_BW_160: + ch->bw = BRCMU_CHAN_BW_160; + ch->sb = brcmu_maskget16(ch->chspec, BRCMU_CHSPEC_D11AC_SB_MASK, + BRCMU_CHSPEC_D11AC_SB_SHIFT); switch (ch->sb) { case BRCMU_CHAN_SB_LLL: ch->control_ch_num -= CH_70MHZ_APART;