diff mbox series

[v2] mm: page_mapped: don't assume compound page is huge or THP

Message ID c440d69879e34209feba21e12d236d06bc0a25db.1543577156.git.jstancek@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2] mm: page_mapped: don't assume compound page is huge or THP | expand

Commit Message

Jan Stancek Nov. 30, 2018, 12:06 p.m. UTC
LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
on arm64:
    page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
    stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
    kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
    proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
    __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
    vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
    SyS_read+0x60/0xc0

Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
(COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running
(for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory
that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
        for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
                if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
                        return true;
	}

I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
with a custom kernel module [1] which:
- allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
- allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
  (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
- 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
- second page of COPY is marked as not present
- call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd
  COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)

[1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c

Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages.

Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
---
 mm/util.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Changes in v2:
- change the loop instead so we check also mapcount of subpages

Comments

Michal Hocko Nov. 30, 2018, 12:18 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri 30-11-18 13:06:57, Jan Stancek wrote:
> LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
> on arm64:
>     page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
>     stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
>     kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
>     proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
>     __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
>     vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
>     SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
> 
> Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
> huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
> (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running
> (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory
> that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
>         for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
>                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
>                         return true;
> 	}
> 
> I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
> with a custom kernel module [1] which:
> - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
> - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
>   (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
> - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
> - second page of COPY is marked as not present
> - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd
>   COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)
> 
> [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c
> 
> Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages.

This is much less magic than the previous version. It is still not clear
to me how is mapping higher order pages to page tables other than THP
though. So a more detailed information about the source would bre really
welcome. Once we know that we can add a Fixes tag and also mark the
patch for stable because that sounds like a stable material.

> Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>

The patch looks sensible to me
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Thanks!

> ---
>  mm/util.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - change the loop instead so we check also mapcount of subpages
> 
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 8bf08b5b5760..5c9c7359ee8a 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ bool page_mapped(struct page *page)
>  		return true;
>  	if (PageHuge(page))
>  		return false;
> -	for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < (1 << compound_order(page)); i++) {
>  		if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
>  			return true;
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
>
Kirill A. Shutemov Nov. 30, 2018, 12:36 p.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:18:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 30-11-18 13:06:57, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
> > on arm64:
> >     page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
> >     stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
> >     kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
> >     proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
> >     __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
> >     vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
> >     SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
> > 
> > Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
> > huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
> > (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running
> > (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory
> > that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
> >         for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> >                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
> >                         return true;
> > 	}
> > 
> > I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
> > with a custom kernel module [1] which:
> > - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
> > - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
> >   (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
> > - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
> > - second page of COPY is marked as not present
> > - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd
> >   COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)
> > 
> > [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c
> > 
> > Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages.
> 
> This is much less magic than the previous version. It is still not clear
> to me how is mapping higher order pages to page tables other than THP
> though. So a more detailed information about the source would bre really
> welcome. Once we know that we can add a Fixes tag and also mark the
> patch for stable because that sounds like a stable material.

IIRC, sound subsystem can producuce custom mapped compound pages.

The bug dates back to e1534ae95004.

> > Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> 
> The patch looks sensible to me
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Michal Hocko Nov. 30, 2018, 12:45 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri 30-11-18 15:36:51, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:18:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 30-11-18 13:06:57, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > > LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
> > > on arm64:
> > >     page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
> > >     stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
> > >     kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
> > >     proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
> > >     __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
> > >     vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
> > >     SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
> > > 
> > > Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
> > > huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
> > > (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running
> > > (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory
> > > that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
> > >         for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> > >                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
> > >                         return true;
> > > 	}
> > > 
> > > I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
> > > with a custom kernel module [1] which:
> > > - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
> > > - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
> > >   (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
> > > - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
> > > - second page of COPY is marked as not present
> > > - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd
> > >   COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)
> > > 
> > > [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c
> > > 
> > > Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages.
> > 
> > This is much less magic than the previous version. It is still not clear
> > to me how is mapping higher order pages to page tables other than THP
> > though. So a more detailed information about the source would bre really
> > welcome. Once we know that we can add a Fixes tag and also mark the
> > patch for stable because that sounds like a stable material.
> 
> IIRC, sound subsystem can producuce custom mapped compound pages.

Do I assume correctly that consecutive ptes simply point to subpages?

> The bug dates back to e1534ae95004.

Thanks for the pointer. I thought this was a new and creative usage of
the pte->page mapping but it really looks like your commit just changed
the underlying semantic.
 
> > > Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > > Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> > 
> > The patch looks sensible to me
> > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> 
> -- 
>  Kirill A. Shutemov
Kirill A. Shutemov Nov. 30, 2018, 12:55 p.m. UTC | #4
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:45:46PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 30-11-18 15:36:51, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:18:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Fri 30-11-18 13:06:57, Jan Stancek wrote:
> > > > LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
> > > > on arm64:
> > > >     page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
> > > >     stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
> > > >     kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
> > > >     proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
> > > >     __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
> > > >     vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
> > > >     SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
> > > > 
> > > > Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
> > > > huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
> > > > (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running
> > > > (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory
> > > > that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
> > > >         for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> > > >                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
> > > >                         return true;
> > > > 	}
> > > > 
> > > > I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
> > > > with a custom kernel module [1] which:
> > > > - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
> > > > - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
> > > >   (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
> > > > - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
> > > > - second page of COPY is marked as not present
> > > > - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd
> > > >   COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c
> > > > 
> > > > Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages.
> > > 
> > > This is much less magic than the previous version. It is still not clear
> > > to me how is mapping higher order pages to page tables other than THP
> > > though. So a more detailed information about the source would bre really
> > > welcome. Once we know that we can add a Fixes tag and also mark the
> > > patch for stable because that sounds like a stable material.
> > 
> > IIRC, sound subsystem can producuce custom mapped compound pages.
> 
> Do I assume correctly that consecutive ptes simply point to subpages?

Yes. No huge pages there.
David Hildenbrand Nov. 30, 2018, 3:53 p.m. UTC | #5
On 30.11.18 13:06, Jan Stancek wrote:
> LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
> on arm64:
>     page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
>     stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
>     kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
>     proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
>     __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
>     vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
>     SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
> 
> Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
> huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
> (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running
> (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory
> that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
>         for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
>                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
>                         return true;
> 	}
> 
> I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
> with a custom kernel module [1] which:
> - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
> - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
>   (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
> - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
> - second page of COPY is marked as not present
> - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd
>   COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)
> 
> [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c
> 
> Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages.
> 
> Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> ---
>  mm/util.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - change the loop instead so we check also mapcount of subpages
> 
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 8bf08b5b5760..5c9c7359ee8a 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ bool page_mapped(struct page *page)
>  		return true;
>  	if (PageHuge(page))
>  		return false;
> -	for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < (1 << compound_order(page)); i++) {
>  		if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
>  			return true;
>  	}
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Laszlo Ersek Dec. 3, 2018, 10:23 a.m. UTC | #6
On 11/30/18 13:06, Jan Stancek wrote:
> LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
> on arm64:
>     page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
>     stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
>     kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
>     proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
>     __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
>     vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
>     SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
> 
> Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
> huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
> (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running
> (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory
> that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
>         for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
>                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
>                         return true;
> 	}
> 
> I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
> with a custom kernel module [1] which:
> - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
> - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
>   (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
> - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
> - second page of COPY is marked as not present
> - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd
>   COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)
> 
> [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c
> 
> Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages.
> 
> Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> ---
>  mm/util.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - change the loop instead so we check also mapcount of subpages
> 
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 8bf08b5b5760..5c9c7359ee8a 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ bool page_mapped(struct page *page)
>  		return true;
>  	if (PageHuge(page))
>  		return false;
> -	for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < (1 << compound_order(page)); i++) {
>  		if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
>  			return true;
>  	}
> 

Totally uninformed side-question:

how large can the return value of compound_order() be? MAX_ORDER?

Apparently, MAX_ORDER can be defined as CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER.

"config FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER" is listed in a number of Kconfig files.
Among those, "arch/mips/Kconfig" permits "ranges" (?) that extend up to
64. Same applies to "arch/powerpc/Kconfig" and "arch/sh/mm/Kconfig".

If we left-shift "1" -- a signed int, which I assume in practice will
always have two's complement representation, 1 sign bit, 31 value bits,
and 0 padding bits --, by 31 or more bit positions, we get undefined
behavior (as part of the left-shift operation).

Is this a practical concern?

Thanks,
Laszlo
Kirill A. Shutemov Dec. 3, 2018, 11:28 a.m. UTC | #7
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:23:58AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Totally uninformed side-question:
> 
> how large can the return value of compound_order() be? MAX_ORDER?
> 
> Apparently, MAX_ORDER can be defined as CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER.
> 
> "config FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER" is listed in a number of Kconfig files.
> Among those, "arch/mips/Kconfig" permits "ranges" (?) that extend up to
> 64. Same applies to "arch/powerpc/Kconfig" and "arch/sh/mm/Kconfig".
> 
> If we left-shift "1" -- a signed int, which I assume in practice will
> always have two's complement representation, 1 sign bit, 31 value bits,
> and 0 padding bits --, by 31 or more bit positions, we get undefined
> behavior (as part of the left-shift operation).
> 
> Is this a practical concern?

Not really.

Assuming 4k PAGE_SIZE, compound_order() == 31 means 8 TiB pages. I doubt
we will see such allocation requests any time soon.

Even with 1k base page size, it's still 2 TiB.

We will see other limitations in page allocaiton path before the compund
order type will be an issue.
Andrea Arcangeli Jan. 4, 2019, 9:56 p.m. UTC | #8
[ CC'ed Andrew for potential inclusion in -mm ]

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:06:57PM +0100, Jan Stancek wrote:
> LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
> on arm64:
>     page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
>     stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
>     kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
>     proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
>     __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
>     vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
>     SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
> 
> Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
> huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
> (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running
> (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory
> that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
>         for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
>                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
>                         return true;
> 	}
> 
> I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
> with a custom kernel module [1] which:
> - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
> - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
>   (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
> - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
> - second page of COPY is marked as not present
> - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd
>   COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)
> 
> [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c
> 
> Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages.
> 
> Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> ---
>  mm/util.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - change the loop instead so we check also mapcount of subpages

Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Andrea
Lars Persson Feb. 4, 2019, 2:38 p.m. UTC | #9
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 1:07 PM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
> on arm64:
>     page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
>     stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
>     kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
>     proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
>     __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
>     vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
>     SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
>
> Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
> huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
> (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running
> (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory
> that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
>         for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
>                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
>                         return true;
>         }
>
> I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
> with a custom kernel module [1] which:
> - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
> - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
>   (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
> - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
> - second page of COPY is marked as not present
> - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd
>   COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)
>
> [1] https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c
>
> Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages.
>
> Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> ---
>  mm/util.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Changes in v2:
> - change the loop instead so we check also mapcount of subpages
>
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 8bf08b5b5760..5c9c7359ee8a 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ bool page_mapped(struct page *page)
>                 return true;
>         if (PageHuge(page))
>                 return false;
> -       for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> +       for (i = 0; i < (1 << compound_order(page)); i++) {
>                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
>                         return true;
>         }
> --
> 1.8.3.1

Hi all

This patch landed in the 4.9-stable tree starting from 4.9.151 and it
broke our MIPS1004kc system with CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y.

The breakage consists of random processes dying with SIGILL or SIGSEGV
when we stress test the system with high memory pressure and explicit
memory compaction requested through /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory.
Reverting this patch fixes the crashes.

We can put some effort on debugging if there are no obvious
explanations for this. Keep in mind that this is 32-bit system with
HIGHMEM.

BR,
 Lars
Jan Stancek Feb. 5, 2019, 7:14 a.m. UTC | #10
----- Original Message -----
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 1:07 PM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > LTP proc01 testcase has been observed to rarely trigger crashes
> > on arm64:
> >     page_mapped+0x78/0xb4
> >     stable_page_flags+0x27c/0x338
> >     kpageflags_read+0xfc/0x164
> >     proc_reg_read+0x7c/0xb8
> >     __vfs_read+0x58/0x178
> >     vfs_read+0x90/0x14c
> >     SyS_read+0x60/0xc0
> >
> > Issue is that page_mapped() assumes that if compound page is not
> > huge, then it must be THP. But if this is 'normal' compound page
> > (COMPOUND_PAGE_DTOR), then following loop can keep running
> > (for HPAGE_PMD_NR iterations) until it tries to read from memory
> > that isn't mapped and triggers a panic:
> >         for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> >                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
> >                         return true;
> >         }
> >
> > I could replicate this on x86 (v4.20-rc4-98-g60b548237fed) only
> > with a custom kernel module [1] which:
> > - allocates compound page (PAGEC) of order 1
> > - allocates 2 normal pages (COPY), which are initialized to 0xff
> >   (to satisfy _mapcount >= 0)
> > - 2 PAGEC page structs are copied to address of first COPY page
> > - second page of COPY is marked as not present
> > - call to page_mapped(COPY) now triggers fault on access to 2nd
> >   COPY page at offset 0x30 (_mapcount)
> >
> > [1]
> > https://github.com/jstancek/reproducers/blob/master/kernel/page_mapped_crash/repro.c
> >
> > Fix the loop to iterate for "1 << compound_order" pages.
> >
> > Debugged-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Suggested-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/util.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - change the loop instead so we check also mapcount of subpages
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> > index 8bf08b5b5760..5c9c7359ee8a 100644
> > --- a/mm/util.c
> > +++ b/mm/util.c
> > @@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ bool page_mapped(struct page *page)
> >                 return true;
> >         if (PageHuge(page))
> >                 return false;
> > -       for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
> > +       for (i = 0; i < (1 << compound_order(page)); i++) {
> >                 if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
> >                         return true;
> >         }
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> 
> Hi all
> 
> This patch landed in the 4.9-stable tree starting from 4.9.151 and it
> broke our MIPS1004kc system with CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y.

Hi,

are you using THP (CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)?

The changed line should affect only THP and normal compound pages,
so a test with THP disabled might be interesting. 

> 
> The breakage consists of random processes dying with SIGILL or SIGSEGV
> when we stress test the system with high memory pressure and explicit
> memory compaction requested through /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory.
> Reverting this patch fixes the crashes.
> 
> We can put some effort on debugging if there are no obvious
> explanations for this. Keep in mind that this is 32-bit system with
> HIGHMEM.

Nothing obvious that I can see. I've been trying to reproduce on
32-bit x86 Fedora with no luck so far.

Regards,
Jan
Lars Persson Feb. 18, 2019, 1:43 p.m. UTC | #11
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 8:14 AM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are you using THP (CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)?
>
> The changed line should affect only THP and normal compound pages,
> so a test with THP disabled might be interesting.
>
> >
> > The breakage consists of random processes dying with SIGILL or SIGSEGV
> > when we stress test the system with high memory pressure and explicit
> > memory compaction requested through /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory.
> > Reverting this patch fixes the crashes.
> >
> > We can put some effort on debugging if there are no obvious
> > explanations for this. Keep in mind that this is 32-bit system with
> > HIGHMEM.
>
> Nothing obvious that I can see. I've been trying to reproduce on
> 32-bit x86 Fedora with no luck so far.
>

Hi

Thanks for looking in to it. After some deep dive in MM code, I think
it is safe to say this patch was innocent.

All traces studied so far points to a missing cache coherency call in
mm/migrate.c:migrate_page that is needed only for those evil MIPSes
that lack I/D cache coherency. I will send a write-up to linux-mips
about this. Basically for a non-mapped page it does only a copy of
page data and metadata but no flush_dcache_page() call will be done.
This races with subsequent use of the page.

BR,
 Lars
Michal Hocko Feb. 18, 2019, 1:50 p.m. UTC | #12
On Mon 18-02-19 14:43:58, Lars Persson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 8:14 AM Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > are you using THP (CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE)?
> >
> > The changed line should affect only THP and normal compound pages,
> > so a test with THP disabled might be interesting.
> >
> > >
> > > The breakage consists of random processes dying with SIGILL or SIGSEGV
> > > when we stress test the system with high memory pressure and explicit
> > > memory compaction requested through /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory.
> > > Reverting this patch fixes the crashes.
> > >
> > > We can put some effort on debugging if there are no obvious
> > > explanations for this. Keep in mind that this is 32-bit system with
> > > HIGHMEM.
> >
> > Nothing obvious that I can see. I've been trying to reproduce on
> > 32-bit x86 Fedora with no luck so far.
> >
> 
> Hi
> 
> Thanks for looking in to it. After some deep dive in MM code, I think
> it is safe to say this patch was innocent.
> 
> All traces studied so far points to a missing cache coherency call in
> mm/migrate.c:migrate_page that is needed only for those evil MIPSes
> that lack I/D cache coherency. I will send a write-up to linux-mips
> about this. Basically for a non-mapped page it does only a copy of
> page data and metadata but no flush_dcache_page() call will be done.
> This races with subsequent use of the page.

Please make sure to cc linux-mm for the patch
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
index 8bf08b5b5760..5c9c7359ee8a 100644
--- a/mm/util.c
+++ b/mm/util.c
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@  bool page_mapped(struct page *page)
 		return true;
 	if (PageHuge(page))
 		return false;
-	for (i = 0; i < hpage_nr_pages(page); i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < (1 << compound_order(page)); i++) {
 		if (atomic_read(&page[i]._mapcount) >= 0)
 			return true;
 	}