Message ID | bcebf81255a71b34541bc00bcb505e815193f0be.1544035391.git.mchehab+samsung@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | media: rockchip/vpu: fix a few alignments | expand |
On 12/05/2018 07:43 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > As reported by checkpatch.pl, some function calls have a wrong > alignment. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> > --- > drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > index 8919151e1631..e27c10855de5 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > @@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ void rk3288_vpu_jpeg_enc_run(struct rockchip_vpu_ctx *ctx) > rk3288_vpu_set_src_img_ctrl(vpu, ctx); > rk3288_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_buffers(vpu, ctx, src_buf); > rk3288_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_qtable(vpu, > - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), > - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); > + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), > + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); But now you get warnings because this is > 80 columns. I think the 'cure' is worse than the disease. I see this is already merged, but I don't think this patch improves readability, which is more important than a checkpatch warning IMHO. Regards, Hans > > reg = VEPU_REG_AXI_CTRL_OUTPUT_SWAP16 > | VEPU_REG_AXI_CTRL_INPUT_SWAP16 > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > index 8afa2162bf9f..5f75e4d11d76 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > @@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ void rk3399_vpu_jpeg_enc_run(struct rockchip_vpu_ctx *ctx) > rk3399_vpu_set_src_img_ctrl(vpu, ctx); > rk3399_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_buffers(vpu, ctx, src_buf); > rk3399_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_qtable(vpu, > - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), > - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); > + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), > + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); > > reg = VEPU_REG_OUTPUT_SWAP32 > | VEPU_REG_OUTPUT_SWAP16 >
Em Wed, 5 Dec 2018 19:48:25 +0100 Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> escreveu: > On 12/05/2018 07:43 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > As reported by checkpatch.pl, some function calls have a wrong > > alignment. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> > > --- > > drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c | 4 ++-- > > drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c | 4 ++-- > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > > index 8919151e1631..e27c10855de5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > > @@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ void rk3288_vpu_jpeg_enc_run(struct rockchip_vpu_ctx *ctx) > > rk3288_vpu_set_src_img_ctrl(vpu, ctx); > > rk3288_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_buffers(vpu, ctx, src_buf); > > rk3288_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_qtable(vpu, > > - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), > > - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); > > + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), > > + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); > > But now you get warnings because this is > 80 columns. > > I think the 'cure' is worse than the disease. > > I see this is already merged, but I don't think this patch improves readability, > which is more important than a checkpatch warning IMHO. IMHO, it is a way more readable if things got aligned. Very very few people nowadays (if any) write patches directly at a 80 columns console. Btw, speaking about 80 cols, usually your commit messages are longer than that (the limit is actually 80 cols - 4). I keep fixing the corresponding checkpatch.pl warnings from your patches (when I have time) :-) > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > > reg = VEPU_REG_AXI_CTRL_OUTPUT_SWAP16 > > | VEPU_REG_AXI_CTRL_INPUT_SWAP16 > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > > index 8afa2162bf9f..5f75e4d11d76 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c > > @@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ void rk3399_vpu_jpeg_enc_run(struct rockchip_vpu_ctx *ctx) > > rk3399_vpu_set_src_img_ctrl(vpu, ctx); > > rk3399_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_buffers(vpu, ctx, src_buf); > > rk3399_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_qtable(vpu, > > - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), > > - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); > > + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), > > + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); > > > > reg = VEPU_REG_OUTPUT_SWAP32 > > | VEPU_REG_OUTPUT_SWAP16 > > > Thanks, Mauro
diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c index 8919151e1631..e27c10855de5 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c @@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ void rk3288_vpu_jpeg_enc_run(struct rockchip_vpu_ctx *ctx) rk3288_vpu_set_src_img_ctrl(vpu, ctx); rk3288_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_buffers(vpu, ctx, src_buf); rk3288_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_qtable(vpu, - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); reg = VEPU_REG_AXI_CTRL_OUTPUT_SWAP16 | VEPU_REG_AXI_CTRL_INPUT_SWAP16 diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c index 8afa2162bf9f..5f75e4d11d76 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c @@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ void rk3399_vpu_jpeg_enc_run(struct rockchip_vpu_ctx *ctx) rk3399_vpu_set_src_img_ctrl(vpu, ctx); rk3399_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_buffers(vpu, ctx, src_buf); rk3399_vpu_jpeg_enc_set_qtable(vpu, - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), - rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 0), + rockchip_vpu_jpeg_get_qtable(&jpeg_ctx, 1)); reg = VEPU_REG_OUTPUT_SWAP32 | VEPU_REG_OUTPUT_SWAP16
As reported by checkpatch.pl, some function calls have a wrong alignment. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> --- drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3288_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c | 4 ++-- drivers/staging/media/rockchip/vpu/rk3399_vpu_hw_jpeg_enc.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)