diff mbox series

[for-next,05/30] arm64: function_graph: Remove use of FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH

Message ID 20181205234829.164618323@goodmis.org (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series None | expand

Commit Message

Steven Rostedt Dec. 5, 2018, 11:47 p.m. UTC
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Functions in the set_graph_notrace no longer subtract FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH
from curr_ret_stack, as that is now implemented via the trace_recursion
flags. Access to curr_ret_stack no longer needs to worry about checking for
this. curr_ret_stack is still initialized to -1, when there's not a shadow
stack allocated.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Steven Rostedt Dec. 6, 2018, 3:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 05 Dec 2018 18:47:54 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> Functions in the set_graph_notrace no longer subtract FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH
> from curr_ret_stack, as that is now implemented via the trace_recursion
> flags. Access to curr_ret_stack no longer needs to worry about checking for
> this. curr_ret_stack is still initialized to -1, when there's not a shadow
> stack allocated.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

I haven't pushed this to Linux next yet. I tested the entire tree as
well as crossed compiled it against arm64.

Can you give me an ack for this patch?

Thanks!

-- Steve

> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index 4989f7ea1e59..7723dadf25be 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
>  			(frame->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
>  		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(frame->graph == -1))
>  			return -EINVAL;
> -		if (frame->graph < -1)
> -			frame->graph += FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH;
> -
>  		/*
>  		 * This is a case where function graph tracer has
>  		 * modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame
Will Deacon Dec. 6, 2018, 3:49 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 06:47:54PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> Functions in the set_graph_notrace no longer subtract FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH
> from curr_ret_stack, as that is now implemented via the trace_recursion
> flags. Access to curr_ret_stack no longer needs to worry about checking for
> this. curr_ret_stack is still initialized to -1, when there's not a shadow
> stack allocated.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index 4989f7ea1e59..7723dadf25be 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
>  			(frame->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
>  		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(frame->graph == -1))
>  			return -EINVAL;
> -		if (frame->graph < -1)
> -			frame->graph += FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH;
> -

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Will
Steven Rostedt Dec. 6, 2018, 3:55 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 6 Dec 2018 15:49:32 +0000
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 06:47:54PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > 
> > Functions in the set_graph_notrace no longer subtract FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH
> > from curr_ret_stack, as that is now implemented via the trace_recursion
> > flags. Access to curr_ret_stack no longer needs to worry about checking for
> > this. curr_ret_stack is still initialized to -1, when there's not a shadow
> > stack allocated.
> > 
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 3 ---
> >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > index 4989f7ea1e59..7723dadf25be 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> > @@ -61,9 +61,6 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
> >  			(frame->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
> >  		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(frame->graph == -1))
> >  			return -EINVAL;
> > -		if (frame->graph < -1)
> > -			frame->graph += FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH;
> > -  
> 
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> 

Thanks Will!

-- Steve
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 4989f7ea1e59..7723dadf25be 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -61,9 +61,6 @@  int notrace unwind_frame(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stackframe *frame)
 			(frame->pc == (unsigned long)return_to_handler)) {
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(frame->graph == -1))
 			return -EINVAL;
-		if (frame->graph < -1)
-			frame->graph += FTRACE_NOTRACE_DEPTH;
-
 		/*
 		 * This is a case where function graph tracer has
 		 * modified a return address (LR) in a stack frame