Message ID | cover.1544292845.git.marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add devicetree support for ad5933 | expand |
Parts of this work came from contributions of Alexandru Ardelean and Dragos Bogdan, I and Gabriel would like to thank for the insights provided by their previous patches. Maybe it would be the case to add them as co-authors of this patch set. We also wanted to thank Jhonatan Cameron for giving us the pieces of advice needed for this work. Thanks, Marcelo Em sáb, 8 de dez de 2018 às 16:18, Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@gmail.com> escreveu: > > This series of patches change voltage regulator error handling for the > ad5933. > It also add an option to specify external clock reference using a clock > framework and remove the old platform data structure. > Finally it adds binding documentation for devicetree. > > Marcelo Schmitt (3): > staging: iio: ad5933: change regulator binging for vref > staging: iio: ad5933: use clock framework for clock reference > staging: iio: ad5933: add binding doc for ad5933 > > .../iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.txt | 26 +++++++++ > .../staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c | 57 +++++++++---------- > 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.txt > > -- > 2.17.1 >
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 04:56:45PM -0200, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: > Parts of this work came from contributions of Alexandru Ardelean and > Dragos Bogdan, I and Gabriel would like to thank for the insights > provided by their previous patches. Maybe it would be the case to add > them as co-authors of this patch set. That's what the Co-developed-by: tag is for, please use it :)
On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 22:10:43 +0100 Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 04:56:45PM -0200, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: > > Parts of this work came from contributions of Alexandru Ardelean and > > Dragos Bogdan, I and Gabriel would like to thank for the insights > > provided by their previous patches. Maybe it would be the case to add > > them as co-authors of this patch set. > > That's what the Co-developed-by: tag is for, please use it :) > Alexandru, Dragos. No idea how involved you were in the actual patch... Work amongst amongst the 4 of you what you would like to do and let us know! Patches look fine, though we need to let the DT maintainers have a few days at least to get around to looking if they want to (they don't always on simple bindings like these). Jonathan
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 21:27 +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 22:10:43 +0100 > Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 04:56:45PM -0200, Marcelo Schmitt wrote: > > > Parts of this work came from contributions of Alexandru Ardelean and > > > Dragos Bogdan, I and Gabriel would like to thank for the insights > > > provided by their previous patches. Maybe it would be the case to add > > > them as co-authors of this patch set. > > > > That's what the Co-developed-by: tag is for, please use it :) > > > > Alexandru, Dragos. No idea how involved you were in the actual > patch... > > Work amongst amongst the 4 of you what you would like to do and > let us know! > Hey, To give a bit of context, I sent some patches some time ago that deal with this, but haven't had time to re-spin them [based on Jonathan's comments]. I've discussed with Dragos. From our side, any version that is decided with respect to the `Co- developed-by:` tag is fine. i.e. we don't need to be mentioned in the commits. I hope this is a sufficiently good answer [for the whole legal stuff]. > Patches look fine, though we need to let the DT maintainers have a few > days at least to get around to looking if they want to (they don't always > on simple bindings like these). > Thanks Alex > Jonathan >