Message ID | 20190110120142.22271-2-worldhello.net@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | pack-redundant: new algorithm to find min packs | expand |
Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> writes: > From: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> > > Add test cases for git pack-redundant to validate new algorithm for git > pack-redundant. > > Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> > Reviewed-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> > --- > t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 157 insertions(+) > create mode 100755 t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh > > diff --git a/t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh b/t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 0000000000..7410426dee > --- /dev/null > +++ b/t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > +# > +# Copyright (c) 2018 Jiang Xin > +# > + > +test_description='git pack-redundant test' > + > +. ./test-lib.sh > + > +create_commits() > +{ Style (see Documentation/CodingGuidelines). > + parent= > + for name in A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R > + do > + test_tick && > + T=$(git write-tree) && > + if test -z "$parent" > + then > + oid=$(echo $name | git commit-tree $T) > + else > + oid=$(echo $name | git commit-tree -p $parent $T) > + fi && > + eval $name=$oid && > + parent=$oid || > + return 1 > + done > + git update-ref refs/heads/master $M > +} > + > +create_pack_1() > +{ > + P1=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$T\n$A\n$B\n$C\n$D\n$E\n$F\n$R\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && Yikes. Can't "git pack-objects" get the input directly without overlong printf, something along the lines of... P1=$(git -C .git/objects/pack pack-objects pack <<-EOF $A $B $C ... $R EOF ) > + eval P$P1=P1:$P1 > +} > ... > +test_expect_success 'setup' ' > + create_commits > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'no redundant packs' ' > + create_pack_1 && create_pack_2 && create_pack_3 && > + git pack-redundant --all >out && > + test_must_be_empty out > +' > + > +test_expect_success 'create pack 4, 5' ' > + create_pack_4 && create_pack_5 > +' > + > +cat >expected <<EOF > +P2:$P2 > +EOF Move this to the next "expect success" block? > +test_expect_success 'one of pack-2/pack-3 is redundant' ' > + git pack-redundant --all >out && > + sed -E -e "s#.*/pack-(.*)\.(idx|pack)#\1#" out | \ How portable is "sed -E" (it is not even in POSIX.1)? Wouldn't it be easier to work with to have two "-e" fed to a single sed invocation instead?
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 于2019年1月11日周五 上午5:11写道: > > Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> writes: > > > From: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> > > +create_commits() > > +{ > > Style (see Documentation/CodingGuidelines). OK, parenthese after function name. > > > +create_pack_1() > > +{ > > + P1=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$T\n$A\n$B\n$C\n$D\n$E\n$F\n$R\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && > > Yikes. Can't "git pack-objects" get the input directly without > overlong printf, something along the lines of... > > P1=$(git -C .git/objects/pack pack-objects pack <<-EOF > $A > $B > $C > ... > $R > EOF > ) Find that no space before <OID>, because git-pack-objects not allow that, and mached parentheses should in the same line. So Will write like this: create_pack_1() { P1=$(git -C .git/objects/pack pack-objects pack <<-EOF) && $T $A $B $R EOF eval P$P1=P1:$P1 } > > +test_expect_success 'no redundant packs' ' > > + create_pack_1 && create_pack_2 && create_pack_3 && > > + git pack-redundant --all >out && > > + test_must_be_empty out > > +' > > + > > +test_expect_success 'create pack 4, 5' ' > > + create_pack_4 && create_pack_5 > > +' > > + > > +cat >expected <<EOF > > +P2:$P2 > > +EOF > > Move this to the next "expect success" block? $P4 and $P5 are defined after calling `create_pack_4` and `create_pack_5`, so create pack functions should be called before write `expected` file, if puts $P4 and/or $P5 in the expected file. For this case, $P4 and $P5 not in expected file, we can move create_pack_4 and 5 to the following test_expect_success block, but the new algorithm may change the expected file. > > > +test_expect_success 'one of pack-2/pack-3 is redundant' ' > > + git pack-redundant --all >out && > > + sed -E -e "s#.*/pack-(.*)\.(idx|pack)#\1#" out | \ > > How portable is "sed -E" (it is not even in POSIX.1)? Wouldn't it > be easier to work with to have two "-e" fed to a single sed > invocation instead? will fix using two '-e' commands.
Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> writes: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 于2019年1月11日周五 上午5:11写道: >> >> Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > From: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@alibaba-inc.com> >> > +create_commits() >> > +{ >> >> Style (see Documentation/CodingGuidelines). > > OK, parenthese after function name. >> >> > +create_pack_1() >> > +{ >> > + P1=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$T\n$A\n$B\n$C\n$D\n$E\n$F\n$R\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && >> >> Yikes. Can't "git pack-objects" get the input directly without >> overlong printf, something along the lines of... >> >> P1=$(git -C .git/objects/pack pack-objects pack <<-EOF >> $A >> $B >> $C >> ... >> $R >> EOF >> ) > > Find that no space before <OID>, because git-pack-objects not allow that, > and mached parentheses should in the same line. > So Will write like this: > > create_pack_1() { > P1=$(git -C .git/objects/pack pack-objects pack <<-EOF) && > $T Isn't the whole point of <<-EOF (notice the leading dash) to allow us to indent the here-doc with horizontal tab?
diff --git a/t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh b/t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000000..7410426dee --- /dev/null +++ b/t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# +# Copyright (c) 2018 Jiang Xin +# + +test_description='git pack-redundant test' + +. ./test-lib.sh + +create_commits() +{ + parent= + for name in A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R + do + test_tick && + T=$(git write-tree) && + if test -z "$parent" + then + oid=$(echo $name | git commit-tree $T) + else + oid=$(echo $name | git commit-tree -p $parent $T) + fi && + eval $name=$oid && + parent=$oid || + return 1 + done + git update-ref refs/heads/master $M +} + +create_pack_1() +{ + P1=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$T\n$A\n$B\n$C\n$D\n$E\n$F\n$R\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && + eval P$P1=P1:$P1 +} + +create_pack_2() +{ + P2=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$B\n$C\n$D\n$E\n$G\n$H\n$I\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && + eval P$P2=P2:$P2 +} + +create_pack_3() +{ + P3=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$F\n$I\n$J\n$K\n$L\n$M\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && + eval P$P3=P3:$P3 +} + +create_pack_4() +{ + P4=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$J\n$K\n$L\n$M\n$P\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && + eval P$P4=P4:$P4 +} + +create_pack_5() +{ + P5=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$G\n$H\n$N\n$O\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && + eval P$P5=P5:$P5 +} + +create_pack_6() +{ + P6=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$N\n$O\n$Q\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && + eval P$P6=P6:$P6 +} + +create_pack_7() +{ + P7=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$P\n$Q\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && + eval P$P7=P7:$P7 +} + +create_pack_8() +{ + P8=$(cd .git/objects/pack; printf "$A\n" | git pack-objects pack 2>/dev/null) && + eval P$P8=P8:$P8 +} + +test_expect_success 'setup' ' + create_commits +' + +test_expect_success 'no redundant packs' ' + create_pack_1 && create_pack_2 && create_pack_3 && + git pack-redundant --all >out && + test_must_be_empty out +' + +test_expect_success 'create pack 4, 5' ' + create_pack_4 && create_pack_5 +' + +cat >expected <<EOF +P2:$P2 +EOF + +test_expect_success 'one of pack-2/pack-3 is redundant' ' + git pack-redundant --all >out && + sed -E -e "s#.*/pack-(.*)\.(idx|pack)#\1#" out | \ + sort -u | \ + while read p; do eval echo "\${P$p}"; done | \ + sort >actual && \ + test_cmp expected actual +' + +test_expect_success 'create pack 6, 7' ' + create_pack_6 && create_pack_7 +' + +cat >expected <<EOF +P2:$P2 +P4:$P4 +P6:$P6 +EOF + +test_expect_success 'pack 2, 4, and 6 are redundant' ' + git pack-redundant --all >out && + sed -E -e "s#.*/pack-(.*)\.(idx|pack)#\1#" out | \ + sort -u | \ + while read p; do eval echo "\${P$p}"; done | \ + sort >actual && \ + test_cmp expected actual +' + +test_expect_success 'create pack 8' ' + create_pack_8 +' + +cat >expected <<EOF +P2:$P2 +P4:$P4 +P6:$P6 +P8:$P8 +EOF + +test_expect_success 'pack-8, subset of pack-1, is also redundant' ' + git pack-redundant --all >out && + sed -E -e "s#.*/pack-(.*)\.(idx|pack)#\1#" out | \ + sort -u | \ + while read p; do eval echo "\${P$p}"; done | \ + sort >actual && \ + test_cmp expected actual +' + +test_expect_success 'clear loose objects' ' + git prune-packed && + find .git/objects -type f | sed -e "/objects\/pack\//d" >out && + test_must_be_empty out +' + +test_expect_success 'remove redundant packs' ' + git pack-redundant --all | xargs rm && + git fsck && + git pack-redundant --all >out && + test_must_be_empty out +' + +test_done