Message ID | 6ccac7db-3ab7-e396-90be-8681a8ee336b@web.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: dts: hikey: Give wifi some time after power-on | expand |
Adding a few folks to cc from the thread here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10734021/ As this sounds like a very similar issue. thanks -john On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 3:38 AM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote: > > From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> > > Somewhere along recent changes to power control of the wl1835, power-on > became very unreliable on the hikey, failing like this: > > wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:1 failed with error -16 > wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:2 failed with error -16 > > After playing with some dt parameters and comparing to other users of > this chip, it turned out we need some power-on delay to make things > stable again. In contrast to those other users which define 200 ms, the > hikey is already very happy with 1 ms. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> > --- > > Tested with 4.19 and linus/master. > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts > index f4964bee6a1a..1e771bf201b9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts > @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ > reset-gpios = <&gpio0 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > clocks = <&pmic>; > clock-names = "ext_clock"; > + post-power-on-delay-ms = <1>; > power-off-delay-us = <10>; > }; > > -- > 2.16.4
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 23:21, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote: > > Adding a few folks to cc from the thread here: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10734021/ > > As this sounds like a very similar issue. > thanks > -john John, thanks for looping me in. > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 3:38 AM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote: > > > > From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> > > > > Somewhere along recent changes to power control of the wl1835, power-on > > became very unreliable on the hikey, failing like this: > > > > wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:1 failed with error -16 > > wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:2 failed with error -16 > > > > After playing with some dt parameters and comparing to other users of > > this chip, it turned out we need some power-on delay to make things > > stable again. In contrast to those other users which define 200 ms, the > > hikey is already very happy with 1 ms. According to the discussions we had so far, this doesn't sound like the correct solution. I am intending to post patch soon, however, I am not sure exactly what solution to pick yet. I will keep you on cc - and of course I appreciate if you could help to test. Kind regards Uffe > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> > > --- > > > > Tested with 4.19 and linus/master. > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts > > index f4964bee6a1a..1e771bf201b9 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts > > @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ > > reset-gpios = <&gpio0 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > > clocks = <&pmic>; > > clock-names = "ext_clock"; > > + post-power-on-delay-ms = <1>; > > power-off-delay-us = <10>; > > }; > > > > -- > > 2.16.4
On 03.01.19 22:32, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 23:21, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Adding a few folks to cc from the thread here: >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10734021/ >> >> As this sounds like a very similar issue. >> thanks >> -john > > John, thanks for looping me in. > >> >> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 3:38 AM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote: >>> >>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> >>> >>> Somewhere along recent changes to power control of the wl1835, power-on >>> became very unreliable on the hikey, failing like this: >>> >>> wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:1 failed with error -16 >>> wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:2 failed with error -16 >>> >>> After playing with some dt parameters and comparing to other users of >>> this chip, it turned out we need some power-on delay to make things >>> stable again. In contrast to those other users which define 200 ms, the >>> hikey is already very happy with 1 ms. > > According to the discussions we had so far, this doesn't sound like > the correct solution. > > I am intending to post patch soon, however, I am not sure exactly what > solution to pick yet. I will keep you on cc - and of course I > appreciate if you could help to test. > FWIW, the Ultra96 is also affected. Here I worked around it by using a 10 ms power-on delay. The original workaround from the other thread did not help. Looking forward to the proper fix now! Jan > Kind regards > Uffe > >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> >>> --- >>> >>> Tested with 4.19 and linus/master. >>> >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts >>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts >>> index f4964bee6a1a..1e771bf201b9 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts >>> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ >>> reset-gpios = <&gpio0 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; >>> clocks = <&pmic>; >>> clock-names = "ext_clock"; >>> + post-power-on-delay-ms = <1>; >>> power-off-delay-us = <10>; >>> }; >>> >>> -- >>> 2.16.4
On 06.01.19 10:53, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 03.01.19 22:32, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 23:21, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> Adding a few folks to cc from the thread here: >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10734021/ >>> >>> As this sounds like a very similar issue. >>> thanks >>> -john >> >> John, thanks for looping me in. >> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 3:38 AM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> >>>> >>>> Somewhere along recent changes to power control of the wl1835, power-on >>>> became very unreliable on the hikey, failing like this: >>>> >>>> wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:1 failed with error -16 >>>> wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:2 failed with error -16 >>>> >>>> After playing with some dt parameters and comparing to other users of >>>> this chip, it turned out we need some power-on delay to make things >>>> stable again. In contrast to those other users which define 200 ms, the >>>> hikey is already very happy with 1 ms. >> >> According to the discussions we had so far, this doesn't sound like >> the correct solution. >> >> I am intending to post patch soon, however, I am not sure exactly what >> solution to pick yet. I will keep you on cc - and of course I >> appreciate if you could help to test. >> > > FWIW, the Ultra96 is also affected. Here I worked around it by using a 10 ms > power-on delay. The original workaround from the other thread did not help. > Looking forward to the proper fix now! > Any news on this regression? Jan
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 09:10, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote: > > On 06.01.19 10:53, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 03.01.19 22:32, Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 at 23:21, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> Adding a few folks to cc from the thread here: > >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10734021/ > >>> > >>> As this sounds like a very similar issue. > >>> thanks > >>> -john > >> > >> John, thanks for looping me in. > >> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 3:38 AM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> > >>>> > >>>> Somewhere along recent changes to power control of the wl1835, power-on > >>>> became very unreliable on the hikey, failing like this: > >>>> > >>>> wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:1 failed with error -16 > >>>> wl1271_sdio: probe of mmc2:0001:2 failed with error -16 > >>>> > >>>> After playing with some dt parameters and comparing to other users of > >>>> this chip, it turned out we need some power-on delay to make things > >>>> stable again. In contrast to those other users which define 200 ms, the > >>>> hikey is already very happy with 1 ms. > >> > >> According to the discussions we had so far, this doesn't sound like > >> the correct solution. > >> > >> I am intending to post patch soon, however, I am not sure exactly what > >> solution to pick yet. I will keep you on cc - and of course I > >> appreciate if you could help to test. > >> > > > > FWIW, the Ultra96 is also affected. Here I worked around it by using a 10 ms > > power-on delay. The original workaround from the other thread did not help. > > Looking forward to the proper fix now! > > > > Any news on this regression? I will post a (or two) patch during the day. Kind regards Uffe
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts index f4964bee6a1a..1e771bf201b9 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220-hikey.dts @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ reset-gpios = <&gpio0 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; clocks = <&pmic>; clock-names = "ext_clock"; + post-power-on-delay-ms = <1>; power-off-delay-us = <10>; };