Message ID | 20181030210917.32711-1-jae.hyun.yoo@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | i2c: aspeed: Add bus idle waiting logic for multi-master use cases | expand |
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:09:11PM -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote: > In multi-master environment, this driver's master cannot know > exactly when a peer master sends data to this driver's slave so a > case can be happened that this master tries to send data through > the master_xfer function but slave data from peer master is still > being processed by this driver. To prevent state corruption in the > case, this patch adds checking code if any slave operation is > ongoing and it waits up to the bus timeout duration before starting > a master_xfer operation. > > To support this change, it introduces changes on i2c-core-base to > make that able to read the bus timeout and master transfer retries > count values from device tree properties. > > Please review this patch set. Marking this as "Changes requested". I think if the mutex approach works, these patches become obsolete then.
On 1/15/2019 2:47 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:09:11PM -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote: >> In multi-master environment, this driver's master cannot know >> exactly when a peer master sends data to this driver's slave so a >> case can be happened that this master tries to send data through >> the master_xfer function but slave data from peer master is still >> being processed by this driver. To prevent state corruption in the >> case, this patch adds checking code if any slave operation is >> ongoing and it waits up to the bus timeout duration before starting >> a master_xfer operation. >> >> To support this change, it introduces changes on i2c-core-base to >> make that able to read the bus timeout and master transfer retries >> count values from device tree properties. >> >> Please review this patch set. > > Marking this as "Changes requested". I think if the mutex approach > works, these patches become obsolete then. > Hi Wolfram, Thanks for your touching base. I made and tested a new patch in my local. Actually, I couldn't use a mutex because it should provide locking between driver context and interrupt context. Instead, after taking lots of experiments, I checked that idle waiting can be supported by this H/W so I didn't need to use any locking method in the driver code for multi-master handling. I'll submit a new patch tomorrow using a different thread. Please drop this patch set. Thanks, Jae