Message ID | 20190121163316.20616-2-jeffm@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/7] btrfs/010: don't run without /sys/fs/btrfs | expand |
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:33:11AM -0500, jeffm@suse.com wrote: > From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> > > The regex assumes there will be whitespace after the .. in the ranges > and, with larger offsets, there may not be any. Does more than this, right? > Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> > --- > common/filter | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter > index ed082d24..b4443a34 100644 > --- a/common/filter > +++ b/common/filter > @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ _filter_filefrag() > next > } > ($ext, $logical, $physical, $length) = > - (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+):/) > + (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+):/) This is escaping "..", too, isn't it? Cheers, Dave.
On 1/21/19 5:51 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:33:11AM -0500, jeffm@suse.com wrote: >> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> >> >> The regex assumes there will be whitespace after the .. in the ranges >> and, with larger offsets, there may not be any. > > Does more than this, right? I suppose. It converts the interpreted .. into a literal .., which I believe was the original intent. >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> >> --- >> common/filter | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter >> index ed082d24..b4443a34 100644 >> --- a/common/filter >> +++ b/common/filter >> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ _filter_filefrag() >> next >> } >> ($ext, $logical, $physical, $length) = >> - (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+):/) >> + (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+):/) > > This is escaping "..", too, isn't it? Yes, but what else could the .. in the original regex have been referring to? I don't recall seeing any other filefrag format that would match otherwise. I don't have a problem documenting it further, though. -Jeff
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 08:38:17PM -0500, Jeff Mahoney wrote: > On 1/21/19 5:51 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 11:33:11AM -0500, jeffm@suse.com wrote: > >> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> > >> > >> The regex assumes there will be whitespace after the .. in the ranges > >> and, with larger offsets, there may not be any. > > > > Does more than this, right? > > I suppose. It converts the interpreted .. into a literal .., which I > believe was the original intent. > > >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> > >> --- > >> common/filter | 2 +- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter > >> index ed082d24..b4443a34 100644 > >> --- a/common/filter > >> +++ b/common/filter > >> @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ _filter_filefrag() > >> next > >> } > >> ($ext, $logical, $physical, $length) = > >> - (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+):/) > >> + (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+):/) > > > > This is escaping "..", too, isn't it? > > Yes, but what else could the .. in the original regex have been > referring to? I don't recall seeing any other filefrag format that > would match otherwise. Neither do I. My point was it was a change that was not documented in the commit message and so there might be something I was missing. > I don't have a problem documenting it further, though. That'd be great, thanks! Cheers, Dave.
diff --git a/common/filter b/common/filter index ed082d24..b4443a34 100644 --- a/common/filter +++ b/common/filter @@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ _filter_filefrag() next } ($ext, $logical, $physical, $length) = - (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+)..\s+\d+:\s+(\d+):/) + (/^\s*(\d+):\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+)\.\.\s*\d+:\s+(\d+):/) or next; ($flags) = /.*:\s*(\S*)$/; print $physical * $blocksize, "#",