Message ID | 20190110174005.1202564-7-lkundrak@v3.sk (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v5,1/7] dt-bindings: olpc_battery: Add XO-1.5 battery | expand |
Hi, On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 06:40:04PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > This wouldn't work on the DT-based ARM platform. Let's read the EC version > directly from the EC driver instead. > > This removes x86 specific bits that would prevent this driver from being > used with the EC of ARM-based OLPC XO 1.75. > > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> > > --- > Changes since v2: > - Move the priv data allocation hunk from this patch to a proper place > > Changes since v1: > - Use uint8_t instead of unsigned char [1] for ecver > > drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c > index 1fcc459433a8..a6c89d002d5d 100644 > --- a/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c > @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ > #include <linux/olpc-ec.h> > #include <asm/olpc.h> > > - > #define EC_BAT_VOLTAGE 0x10 /* uint16_t, *9.76/32, mV */ > #define EC_BAT_CURRENT 0x11 /* int16_t, *15.625/120, mA */ > #define EC_BAT_ACR 0x12 /* int16_t, *6250/15, µAh */ > @@ -57,6 +56,7 @@ struct olpc_battery_data { > struct power_supply *olpc_ac; > struct power_supply *olpc_bat; > char bat_serial[17]; > + int new_proto; bool? -- Sebastian > }; > > /********************************************************************* > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static const struct power_supply_desc olpc_ac_desc = { > static int olpc_bat_get_status(struct olpc_battery_data *data, > union power_supply_propval *val, uint8_t ec_byte) > { > - if (olpc_platform_info.ecver > 0x44) { > + if (data->new_proto) { > if (ec_byte & (BAT_STAT_CHARGING | BAT_STAT_TRICKLE)) > val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING; > else if (ec_byte & BAT_STAT_DISCHARGING) > @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int olpc_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > struct power_supply_config psy_cfg = {}; > struct olpc_battery_data *data; > uint8_t status; > + uint8_t ecver; > int ret; > > data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); > @@ -615,13 +616,21 @@ static int olpc_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return -ENOMEM; > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data); > > - /* > - * We've seen a number of EC protocol changes; this driver requires > - * the latest EC protocol, supported by 0x44 and above. > - */ > - if (olpc_platform_info.ecver < 0x44) { > + /* See if the EC is already there and get the EC revision */ > + ret = olpc_ec_cmd(EC_FIRMWARE_REV, NULL, 0, &ecver, 1); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + if (ecver > 0x44) { > + /* XO 1 or 1.5 with a new EC firmware. */ > + data->new_proto = 1; > + } else if (ecver < 0x44) { > + /* > + * We've seen a number of EC protocol changes; this driver > + * requires the latest EC protocol, supported by 0x44 and above. > + */ > printk(KERN_NOTICE "OLPC EC version 0x%02x too old for " > - "battery driver.\n", olpc_platform_info.ecver); > + "battery driver.\n", ecver); > return -ENXIO; > } > > -- > 2.20.1 >
diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c index 1fcc459433a8..a6c89d002d5d 100644 --- a/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c +++ b/drivers/power/supply/olpc_battery.c @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ #include <linux/olpc-ec.h> #include <asm/olpc.h> - #define EC_BAT_VOLTAGE 0x10 /* uint16_t, *9.76/32, mV */ #define EC_BAT_CURRENT 0x11 /* int16_t, *15.625/120, mA */ #define EC_BAT_ACR 0x12 /* int16_t, *6250/15, µAh */ @@ -57,6 +56,7 @@ struct olpc_battery_data { struct power_supply *olpc_ac; struct power_supply *olpc_bat; char bat_serial[17]; + int new_proto; }; /********************************************************************* @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static const struct power_supply_desc olpc_ac_desc = { static int olpc_bat_get_status(struct olpc_battery_data *data, union power_supply_propval *val, uint8_t ec_byte) { - if (olpc_platform_info.ecver > 0x44) { + if (data->new_proto) { if (ec_byte & (BAT_STAT_CHARGING | BAT_STAT_TRICKLE)) val->intval = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_CHARGING; else if (ec_byte & BAT_STAT_DISCHARGING) @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int olpc_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct power_supply_config psy_cfg = {}; struct olpc_battery_data *data; uint8_t status; + uint8_t ecver; int ret; data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -615,13 +616,21 @@ static int olpc_battery_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return -ENOMEM; platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data); - /* - * We've seen a number of EC protocol changes; this driver requires - * the latest EC protocol, supported by 0x44 and above. - */ - if (olpc_platform_info.ecver < 0x44) { + /* See if the EC is already there and get the EC revision */ + ret = olpc_ec_cmd(EC_FIRMWARE_REV, NULL, 0, &ecver, 1); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if (ecver > 0x44) { + /* XO 1 or 1.5 with a new EC firmware. */ + data->new_proto = 1; + } else if (ecver < 0x44) { + /* + * We've seen a number of EC protocol changes; this driver + * requires the latest EC protocol, supported by 0x44 and above. + */ printk(KERN_NOTICE "OLPC EC version 0x%02x too old for " - "battery driver.\n", olpc_platform_info.ecver); + "battery driver.\n", ecver); return -ENXIO; }