| Message ID | 1548160717-4059-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | mt76x0 fixes for 4.20 stable | expand |
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:41 AM Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> wrote: > > There ware several bugs introduced in 4.20 development cycle > for mt76x0 driver, that were fixed later but missed 4.20 > release. This patche set fixes issues for MT7610U and > MT7630E. > > Bug reference: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202243 > > Lorenzo Bianconi (1): > mt76x0: phy: unify calibration between mt76x0u and mt76x0e > > Stanislaw Gruszka (6): > mt76x0: do not overwrite other MT_BBP(AGC, 8) fields > mt76x0: use band parameter for LC calibration > mt76x02: run calibration after scanning > mt76x02: assure we update gain after scan > mt76x0: do not perform MCU calibration for MT7630 > mt76x0: antenna select corrections > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h | 1 + > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/main.c | 9 +- > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/mt76x0.h | 5 + > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/phy.c | 170 +++++++-------------- > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/usb.c | 1 + > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02.h | 1 + > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02_eeprom.h | 10 +- > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02_phy.c | 1 + > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/usb_main.c | 3 + > 9 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.3 > Please forgive if I'm mistaken, but I haven't seen this hit the stable queue or see any response at all. Did this get missed or just hasn't been reached yet? Thanks, Zero
Sid Hayn <sidhayn@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:41 AM Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> There ware several bugs introduced in 4.20 development cycle >> for mt76x0 driver, that were fixed later but missed 4.20 >> release. This patche set fixes issues for MT7610U and >> MT7630E. >> >> Bug reference: >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202243 >> >> Lorenzo Bianconi (1): >> mt76x0: phy: unify calibration between mt76x0u and mt76x0e >> >> Stanislaw Gruszka (6): >> mt76x0: do not overwrite other MT_BBP(AGC, 8) fields >> mt76x0: use band parameter for LC calibration >> mt76x02: run calibration after scanning >> mt76x02: assure we update gain after scan >> mt76x0: do not perform MCU calibration for MT7630 >> mt76x0: antenna select corrections >> >> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h | 1 + >> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/main.c | 9 +- >> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/mt76x0.h | 5 + >> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/phy.c | 170 +++++++-------------- >> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/usb.c | 1 + >> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02.h | 1 + >> .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02_eeprom.h | 10 +- >> drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02_phy.c | 1 + >> .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/usb_main.c | 3 + >> 9 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 1.9.3 >> > > Please forgive if I'm mistaken, but I haven't seen this hit the stable > queue or see any response at all. Did this get missed or just hasn't > been reached yet? It's been only 7 days since the patches were submitted. The maintainers have a lot to do and a lot of email to process, don't expect that everything will be done instantly.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:06:41AM -0500, Sid Hayn wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:41 AM Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > There ware several bugs introduced in 4.20 development cycle > > for mt76x0 driver, that were fixed later but missed 4.20 > > release. This patche set fixes issues for MT7610U and > > MT7630E. > > > > Bug reference: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202243 > > > > Lorenzo Bianconi (1): > > mt76x0: phy: unify calibration between mt76x0u and mt76x0e > > > > Stanislaw Gruszka (6): > > mt76x0: do not overwrite other MT_BBP(AGC, 8) fields > > mt76x0: use band parameter for LC calibration > > mt76x02: run calibration after scanning > > mt76x02: assure we update gain after scan > > mt76x0: do not perform MCU calibration for MT7630 > > mt76x0: antenna select corrections > > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h | 1 + > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/main.c | 9 +- > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/mt76x0.h | 5 + > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/phy.c | 170 +++++++-------------- > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/usb.c | 1 + > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02.h | 1 + > > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02_eeprom.h | 10 +- > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02_phy.c | 1 + > > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/usb_main.c | 3 + > > 9 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 1.9.3 > > > > Please forgive if I'm mistaken, but I haven't seen this hit the stable > queue or see any response at all. Did this get missed or just hasn't > been reached yet? Not reached yet, please give us a chance :) Backports that have to be "applied by hand" like this are at the bottom of the pile... greg k-h
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 01:38:30PM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > There ware several bugs introduced in 4.20 development cycle > for mt76x0 driver, that were fixed later but missed 4.20 > release. This patche set fixes issues for MT7610U and > MT7630E. > > Bug reference: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202243 > > Lorenzo Bianconi (1): > mt76x0: phy: unify calibration between mt76x0u and mt76x0e > > Stanislaw Gruszka (6): > mt76x0: do not overwrite other MT_BBP(AGC, 8) fields > mt76x0: use band parameter for LC calibration > mt76x02: run calibration after scanning > mt76x02: assure we update gain after scan > mt76x0: do not perform MCU calibration for MT7630 > mt76x0: antenna select corrections Now queued up, thanks. greg k-h
Thanks for the responses, I know how hard you all work. From my perspective I cannot tell the difference between missed and just in queue. Is there a patchwork page for patches targeting stable, or is the process there too complex for patchwork? Right now I only see the mailing list and the stable queue git tree and no other idea on how to see status. Thanks again for your hard work, truly didn't mean to suggest otherwise. -Zero On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:43 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:06:41AM -0500, Sid Hayn wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 7:41 AM Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > There ware several bugs introduced in 4.20 development cycle > > > for mt76x0 driver, that were fixed later but missed 4.20 > > > release. This patche set fixes issues for MT7610U and > > > MT7630E. > > > > > > Bug reference: > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202243 > > > > > > Lorenzo Bianconi (1): > > > mt76x0: phy: unify calibration between mt76x0u and mt76x0e > > > > > > Stanislaw Gruszka (6): > > > mt76x0: do not overwrite other MT_BBP(AGC, 8) fields > > > mt76x0: use band parameter for LC calibration > > > mt76x02: run calibration after scanning > > > mt76x02: assure we update gain after scan > > > mt76x0: do not perform MCU calibration for MT7630 > > > mt76x0: antenna select corrections > > > > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76.h | 1 + > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/main.c | 9 +- > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/mt76x0.h | 5 + > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/phy.c | 170 +++++++-------------- > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x0/usb.c | 1 + > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02.h | 1 + > > > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02_eeprom.h | 10 +- > > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x02_phy.c | 1 + > > > .../net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2/usb_main.c | 3 + > > > 9 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 125 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 1.9.3 > > > > > > > Please forgive if I'm mistaken, but I haven't seen this hit the stable > > queue or see any response at all. Did this get missed or just hasn't > > been reached yet? > > Not reached yet, please give us a chance :) > > Backports that have to be "applied by hand" like this are at the bottom > of the pile... > > greg k-h
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:55:55AM -0500, Sid Hayn wrote: > Thanks for the responses, I know how hard you all work. From my > perspective I cannot tell the difference between missed and just in > queue. Given that it was only a week, normally it takes longer, so just be patient. > Is there a patchwork page for patches targeting stable, or is the > process there too complex for patchwork? Right now I only see the > mailing list and the stable queue git tree and no other idea on how to > see status. There is no other way, sorry. If after 2 weeks we don't pick something up, and it's not the week after -rc1 happened, just email asking what the status is, it's not a problem. thanks, greg k-h