Message ID | 20190201031104.15064-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Mainlined |
Commit | c3c668e742397dfc107e44c09606cc68b37df30d |
Delegated to: | Jason Gunthorpe |
Headers | show |
Series | [-next] RDMA/hns: Make some function static | expand |
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 11:11:04AM +0800, YueHaibing wrote: > Fixes the following sparse warnings: > > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:5822:5: warning: > symbol 'hns_roce_v2_query_srq' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c:158:6: warning: > symbol 'hns_roce_srq_free' was not declared. Should it be static? > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c:81:5: warning: > symbol 'hns_roce_srq_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> > --- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 2 +- > drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c | 9 +++++---- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Applied to for-next Thanks, Jason
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c index 5c483b4..58271d2 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c @@ -5819,7 +5819,7 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_modify_srq(struct ib_srq *ibsrq, return 0; } -int hns_roce_v2_query_srq(struct ib_srq *ibsrq, struct ib_srq_attr *attr) +static int hns_roce_v2_query_srq(struct ib_srq *ibsrq, struct ib_srq_attr *attr) { struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev = to_hr_dev(ibsrq->device); struct hns_roce_srq *srq = to_hr_srq(ibsrq); diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c index 11be2db..a8ee2f6 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ static int hns_roce_hw2sw_srq(struct hns_roce_dev *dev, HNS_ROCE_CMD_TIMEOUT_MSECS); } -int hns_roce_srq_alloc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u32 pdn, u32 cqn, u16 xrcd, - struct hns_roce_mtt *hr_mtt, u64 db_rec_addr, - struct hns_roce_srq *srq) +static int hns_roce_srq_alloc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u32 pdn, u32 cqn, + u16 xrcd, struct hns_roce_mtt *hr_mtt, + u64 db_rec_addr, struct hns_roce_srq *srq) { struct hns_roce_srq_table *srq_table = &hr_dev->srq_table; struct hns_roce_cmd_mailbox *mailbox; @@ -155,7 +155,8 @@ int hns_roce_srq_alloc(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u32 pdn, u32 cqn, u16 xrcd, return ret; } -void hns_roce_srq_free(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_srq *srq) +static void hns_roce_srq_free(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, + struct hns_roce_srq *srq) { struct hns_roce_srq_table *srq_table = &hr_dev->srq_table; int ret;
Fixes the following sparse warnings: drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c:5822:5: warning: symbol 'hns_roce_v2_query_srq' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c:158:6: warning: symbol 'hns_roce_srq_free' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c:81:5: warning: symbol 'hns_roce_srq_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> --- drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 2 +- drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_srq.c | 9 +++++---- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)