Message ID | 20190114111513.21618-9-kishon@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | PCI: endpoint: Cleanup EPC features | expand |
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 04:45:06PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > pci_epf_alloc_space() sets the MEM TYPE flags to indicate a 32-bit > Base Address Register irrespective of the size. Fix it here to indicate > 64-bit BAR if the size is > 2GB. > > Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> > --- > drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) This looks like a fix and should me marked as such. Does it work as as standalone patch if it gets backported ? Lorenzo > diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c > index 825fa24427a3..8bfdcd291196 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c > @@ -131,7 +131,9 @@ void *pci_epf_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf, size_t size, enum pci_barno bar) > epf->bar[bar].phys_addr = phys_addr; > epf->bar[bar].size = size; > epf->bar[bar].barno = bar; > - epf->bar[bar].flags = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY; > + epf->bar[bar].flags |= upper_32_bits(size) ? > + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 : > + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32; > > return space; > } > -- > 2.17.1 >
Hi Lorenzo, On 11/02/19 11:07 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 04:45:06PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> pci_epf_alloc_space() sets the MEM TYPE flags to indicate a 32-bit >> Base Address Register irrespective of the size. Fix it here to indicate >> 64-bit BAR if the size is > 2GB. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> >> --- >> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > This looks like a fix and should me marked as such. Does it work > as as standalone patch if it gets backported ? Yeah, it should work. But the current users doesn't allocate > 2GB and some EPC drivers configure their registers based on size. So nothing is broken without this patch as such. Thanks Kishon
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 07:17:14PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > On 11/02/19 11:07 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 04:45:06PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >> pci_epf_alloc_space() sets the MEM TYPE flags to indicate a 32-bit > >> Base Address Register irrespective of the size. Fix it here to indicate > >> 64-bit BAR if the size is > 2GB. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 4 +++- > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > This looks like a fix and should me marked as such. Does it work > > as as standalone patch if it gets backported ? > > Yeah, it should work. But the current users doesn't allocate > 2GB and some > EPC drivers configure their registers based on size. So nothing is broken > without this patch as such. I suspect you mean 4GB (here and the commit log), right ? I am checking the commit logs, aiming at merging the patches. Lorenzo
Hi Lorenzo, On 14/02/19 9:59 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 07:17:14PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi Lorenzo, >> >> On 11/02/19 11:07 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 04:45:06PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>> pci_epf_alloc_space() sets the MEM TYPE flags to indicate a 32-bit >>>> Base Address Register irrespective of the size. Fix it here to indicate >>>> 64-bit BAR if the size is > 2GB. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 4 +++- >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> This looks like a fix and should me marked as such. Does it work >>> as as standalone patch if it gets backported ? >> >> Yeah, it should work. But the current users doesn't allocate > 2GB and some >> EPC drivers configure their registers based on size. So nothing is broken >> without this patch as such. > > I suspect you mean 4GB (here and the commit log), right ? I am checking > the commit logs, aiming at merging the patches. A 32bit BAR register can support a 'size' of only up to 2GB. Though it can hold a memory address of up to 4GB. This is also mentioned in the PCI Local Bus Specification. "A 32-bit register can be implemented to support a single memory size that is a power of 2 from 16 bytes to 2 GB" Thanks Kishon
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:49:12AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > On 14/02/19 9:59 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 07:17:14PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >> Hi Lorenzo, > >> > >> On 11/02/19 11:07 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 04:45:06PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >>>> pci_epf_alloc_space() sets the MEM TYPE flags to indicate a 32-bit > >>>> Base Address Register irrespective of the size. Fix it here to indicate > >>>> 64-bit BAR if the size is > 2GB. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> > >>>> --- > >>>> drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 4 +++- > >>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> This looks like a fix and should me marked as such. Does it work > >>> as as standalone patch if it gets backported ? > >> > >> Yeah, it should work. But the current users doesn't allocate > 2GB and some > >> EPC drivers configure their registers based on size. So nothing is broken > >> without this patch as such. > > > > I suspect you mean 4GB (here and the commit log), right ? I am checking > > the commit logs, aiming at merging the patches. > > A 32bit BAR register can support a 'size' of only up to 2GB. Though it > can hold a memory address of up to 4GB. > > This is also mentioned in the PCI Local Bus Specification. "A 32-bit > register can be implemented to support a single memory size that is a > power of 2 from 16 bytes to 2 GB" Very true - sorry for the noise. Lorenz,o
diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c index 825fa24427a3..8bfdcd291196 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c @@ -131,7 +131,9 @@ void *pci_epf_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf, size_t size, enum pci_barno bar) epf->bar[bar].phys_addr = phys_addr; epf->bar[bar].size = size; epf->bar[bar].barno = bar; - epf->bar[bar].flags = PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY; + epf->bar[bar].flags |= upper_32_bits(size) ? + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 : + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32; return space; }
pci_epf_alloc_space() sets the MEM TYPE flags to indicate a 32-bit Base Address Register irrespective of the size. Fix it here to indicate 64-bit BAR if the size is > 2GB. Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> --- drivers/pci/endpoint/pci-epf-core.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)