| Message ID | 20190315081847.4116-1-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | curses ui: always initialize all curses_line fields | expand |
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 08:37, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> wrote: > > cchar_t can contain not only attr and chars fields, but also ext_color. > Initialize the whole structure to zero instead of enumerating fields. > > Spotted by Coverity: CID 1399711 > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> > --- > ui/curses.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ui/curses.c b/ui/curses.c > index d29098db9f..e99fbe3e24 100644 > --- a/ui/curses.c > +++ b/ui/curses.c > @@ -75,9 +75,8 @@ static void curses_update(DisplayChangeListener *dcl, > if (vga_to_curses[ch].chars[0]) { > curses_line[x] = vga_to_curses[ch]; > } else { > + curses_line[x] = (cchar_t) {}; > curses_line[x].chars[0] = ch; > - curses_line[x].chars[1] = 0; > - curses_line[x].attr = 0; > } > curses_line[x].attr |= at; Does this really need the cast ? {} is supposed to be a universal initializer. thanks -- PMM
Peter Maydell, le ven. 15 mars 2019 10:06:48 +0000, a ecrit: > > + curses_line[x] = (cchar_t) {}; > > curses_line[x].chars[0] = ch; > > - curses_line[x].chars[1] = 0; > > - curses_line[x].attr = 0; > > } > > curses_line[x].attr |= at; > > Does this really need the cast ? Yes, otherwise it is refused by the compiler. > {} is supposed to be a universal initializer. When used as initialized (cchar_t foo = {}), yes. But when used in assignations, no, one has to cast it. Samuel
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 10:52, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote: > > Peter Maydell, le ven. 15 mars 2019 10:06:48 +0000, a ecrit: > > > + curses_line[x] = (cchar_t) {}; > > > curses_line[x].chars[0] = ch; > > > - curses_line[x].chars[1] = 0; > > > - curses_line[x].attr = 0; > > > } > > > curses_line[x].attr |= at; > > > > Does this really need the cast ? > > Yes, otherwise it is refused by the compiler. > > > {} is supposed to be a universal initializer. > > When used as initialized (cchar_t foo = {}), yes. But when used in > assignations, no, one has to cast it. Ah -- I hadn't realized that wrinkle; thanks for the explanation. Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> thanks -- PMM
On 3/15/19 5:06 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 08:37, Samuel Thibault > <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> wrote: >> >> cchar_t can contain not only attr and chars fields, but also ext_color. >> Initialize the whole structure to zero instead of enumerating fields. >> >> Spotted by Coverity: CID 1399711 >> >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> >> --- >> ui/curses.c | 3 +-- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/ui/curses.c b/ui/curses.c >> index d29098db9f..e99fbe3e24 100644 >> --- a/ui/curses.c >> +++ b/ui/curses.c >> @@ -75,9 +75,8 @@ static void curses_update(DisplayChangeListener *dcl, >> if (vga_to_curses[ch].chars[0]) { >> curses_line[x] = vga_to_curses[ch]; >> } else { >> + curses_line[x] = (cchar_t) {}; >> curses_line[x].chars[0] = ch; >> - curses_line[x].chars[1] = 0; >> - curses_line[x].attr = 0; >> } >> curses_line[x].attr |= at; > > Does this really need the cast ? {} is supposed to be a > universal initializer. Or is it worth using: curses_line[x] = (cchar_t) { .chars[0] = ch, }; so that all other fields not mentioned are zero-initialized, without relying on the {} extension?
Eric Blake, le ven. 15 mars 2019 08:02:29 -0500, a ecrit: > On 3/15/19 5:06 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 08:37, Samuel Thibault > > <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> wrote: > >> > >> cchar_t can contain not only attr and chars fields, but also ext_color. > >> Initialize the whole structure to zero instead of enumerating fields. > >> > >> Spotted by Coverity: CID 1399711 > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> > >> --- > >> ui/curses.c | 3 +-- > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/ui/curses.c b/ui/curses.c > >> index d29098db9f..e99fbe3e24 100644 > >> --- a/ui/curses.c > >> +++ b/ui/curses.c > >> @@ -75,9 +75,8 @@ static void curses_update(DisplayChangeListener *dcl, > >> if (vga_to_curses[ch].chars[0]) { > >> curses_line[x] = vga_to_curses[ch]; > >> } else { > >> + curses_line[x] = (cchar_t) {}; > >> curses_line[x].chars[0] = ch; > >> - curses_line[x].chars[1] = 0; > >> - curses_line[x].attr = 0; > >> } > >> curses_line[x].attr |= at; > > > > Does this really need the cast ? {} is supposed to be a > > universal initializer. > > Or is it worth using: > > curses_line[x] = (cchar_t) { > .chars[0] = ch, > }; > > so that all other fields not mentioned are zero-initialized, without > relying on the {} extension? Right, it's no less readable :) I have sent an updated patch. Samuel
diff --git a/ui/curses.c b/ui/curses.c index d29098db9f..e99fbe3e24 100644 --- a/ui/curses.c +++ b/ui/curses.c @@ -75,9 +75,8 @@ static void curses_update(DisplayChangeListener *dcl, if (vga_to_curses[ch].chars[0]) { curses_line[x] = vga_to_curses[ch]; } else { + curses_line[x] = (cchar_t) {}; curses_line[x].chars[0] = ch; - curses_line[x].chars[1] = 0; - curses_line[x].attr = 0; } curses_line[x].attr |= at; }
cchar_t can contain not only attr and chars fields, but also ext_color. Initialize the whole structure to zero instead of enumerating fields. Spotted by Coverity: CID 1399711 Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> --- ui/curses.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)