Message ID | 20190319080140.24055-8-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Mediatek MT8183 scpsys support | expand |
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:02 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> wrote: > > Put sram enable and disable control in separate functions. > > Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> Refactoring looks ok, just a small comment. Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> > --- > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > index 3e9be07a2627..65b734b40098 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > @@ -235,12 +235,55 @@ static void scpsys_clk_disable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num) > } > } > > +static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr) > +{ > + u32 val; > + u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; > + int tmp; > + > + val = readl(ctl_addr) & ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; > + writel(val, ctl_addr); > + > + /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */ > + if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) { > + /* > + * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for > + * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup > + * is applied here. > + */ > + usleep_range(12000, 12100); Does the range really need to be so tight? Would 12000, 13000 also be ok? > + } else { > + /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */ > + int ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, > + (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0, > + MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr) > +{ > + u32 val; > + u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; > + int tmp; > + > + val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; > + writel(val, ctl_addr); > + > + /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */ > + return readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, > + (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack, > + MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); > +} > + > static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > { > struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd); > struct scp *scp = scpd->scp; > void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs; > - u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; > u32 val; > int ret, tmp; > > @@ -252,6 +295,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > if (ret) > goto err_clk; > > + /* subsys power on */ > val = readl(ctl_addr); > val |= PWR_ON_BIT; > writel(val, ctl_addr); > @@ -273,24 +317,9 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > val |= PWR_RST_B_BIT; > writel(val, ctl_addr); > > - val &= ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; > - writel(val, ctl_addr); > - > - /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */ > - if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) { > - /* > - * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for > - * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup is > - * applied here. > - */ > - usleep_range(12000, 12100); > - > - } else { > - ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0, > - MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); > - if (ret < 0) > - goto err_pwr_ack; > - } > + ret = scpsys_sram_enable(scpd, ctl_addr); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto err_pwr_ack; > > if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) { > ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg, > @@ -317,7 +346,6 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd); > struct scp *scp = scpd->scp; > void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs; > - u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; > u32 val; > int ret, tmp; > > @@ -329,17 +357,12 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > goto out; > } > > - val = readl(ctl_addr); > - val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; > - writel(val, ctl_addr); > - > - /* wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 */ > - ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack, > - MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); > + ret = scpsys_sram_disable(scpd, ctl_addr); > if (ret < 0) > goto out; > > - val |= PWR_ISO_BIT; > + /* subsys power off */ > + val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_ISO_BIT; > writel(val, ctl_addr); > > val &= ~PWR_RST_B_BIT; > -- > 2.18.0 >
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 20:07 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:02 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> wrote: > > > > Put sram enable and disable control in separate functions. > > > > Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> > > Refactoring looks ok, just a small comment. > > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org> > > > --- > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- > > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > > index 3e9be07a2627..65b734b40098 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c > > @@ -235,12 +235,55 @@ static void scpsys_clk_disable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num) > > } > > } > > > > +static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr) > > +{ > > + u32 val; > > + u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; > > + int tmp; > > + > > + val = readl(ctl_addr) & ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; > > + writel(val, ctl_addr); > > + > > + /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */ > > + if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) { > > + /* > > + * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for > > + * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup > > + * is applied here. > > + */ > > + usleep_range(12000, 12100); > > Does the range really need to be so tight? Would 12000, 13000 also be ok? > I think Sean could give you a more accurate answer. Hi Sean, would you mind answering this question? > > + } else { > > + /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */ > > + int ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, > > + (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0, > > + MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr) > > +{ > > + u32 val; > > + u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; > > + int tmp; > > + > > + val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; > > + writel(val, ctl_addr); > > + > > + /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */ > > + return readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, > > + (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack, > > + MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); > > +} > > + > > static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > { > > struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd); > > struct scp *scp = scpd->scp; > > void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs; > > - u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; > > u32 val; > > int ret, tmp; > > > > @@ -252,6 +295,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > if (ret) > > goto err_clk; > > > > + /* subsys power on */ > > val = readl(ctl_addr); > > val |= PWR_ON_BIT; > > writel(val, ctl_addr); > > @@ -273,24 +317,9 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > val |= PWR_RST_B_BIT; > > writel(val, ctl_addr); > > > > - val &= ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; > > - writel(val, ctl_addr); > > - > > - /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */ > > - if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) { > > - /* > > - * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for > > - * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup is > > - * applied here. > > - */ > > - usleep_range(12000, 12100); > > - > > - } else { > > - ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0, > > - MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); > > - if (ret < 0) > > - goto err_pwr_ack; > > - } > > + ret = scpsys_sram_enable(scpd, ctl_addr); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + goto err_pwr_ack; > > > > if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) { > > ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg, > > @@ -317,7 +346,6 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd); > > struct scp *scp = scpd->scp; > > void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs; > > - u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; > > u32 val; > > int ret, tmp; > > > > @@ -329,17 +357,12 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > goto out; > > } > > > > - val = readl(ctl_addr); > > - val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; > > - writel(val, ctl_addr); > > - > > - /* wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 */ > > - ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack, > > - MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); > > + ret = scpsys_sram_disable(scpd, ctl_addr); > > if (ret < 0) > > goto out; > > > > - val |= PWR_ISO_BIT; > > + /* subsys power off */ > > + val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_ISO_BIT; > > writel(val, ctl_addr); > > > > val &= ~PWR_RST_B_BIT; > > -- > > 2.18.0 > >
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c index 3e9be07a2627..65b734b40098 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c @@ -235,12 +235,55 @@ static void scpsys_clk_disable(struct clk *clk[], int max_num) } } +static int scpsys_sram_enable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr) +{ + u32 val; + u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; + int tmp; + + val = readl(ctl_addr) & ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; + writel(val, ctl_addr); + + /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */ + if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) { + /* + * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for + * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup + * is applied here. + */ + usleep_range(12000, 12100); + } else { + /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */ + int ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, + (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0, + MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + } + + return 0; +} + +static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scp_domain *scpd, void __iomem *ctl_addr) +{ + u32 val; + u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; + int tmp; + + val = readl(ctl_addr) | scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; + writel(val, ctl_addr); + + /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 or 0 */ + return readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, + (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack, + MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); +} + static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) { struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd); struct scp *scp = scpd->scp; void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs; - u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; u32 val; int ret, tmp; @@ -252,6 +295,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) if (ret) goto err_clk; + /* subsys power on */ val = readl(ctl_addr); val |= PWR_ON_BIT; writel(val, ctl_addr); @@ -273,24 +317,9 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) val |= PWR_RST_B_BIT; writel(val, ctl_addr); - val &= ~scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; - writel(val, ctl_addr); - - /* Either wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 0 or have a force wait */ - if (MTK_SCPD_CAPS(scpd, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM)) { - /* - * Currently, MTK_SCPD_FWAIT_SRAM is necessary only for - * MT7622_POWER_DOMAIN_WB and thus just a trivial setup is - * applied here. - */ - usleep_range(12000, 12100); - - } else { - ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == 0, - MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); - if (ret < 0) - goto err_pwr_ack; - } + ret = scpsys_sram_enable(scpd, ctl_addr); + if (ret < 0) + goto err_pwr_ack; if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) { ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg, @@ -317,7 +346,6 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) struct scp_domain *scpd = container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd); struct scp *scp = scpd->scp; void __iomem *ctl_addr = scp->base + scpd->data->ctl_offs; - u32 pdn_ack = scpd->data->sram_pdn_ack_bits; u32 val; int ret, tmp; @@ -329,17 +357,12 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) goto out; } - val = readl(ctl_addr); - val |= scpd->data->sram_pdn_bits; - writel(val, ctl_addr); - - /* wait until SRAM_PDN_ACK all 1 */ - ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctl_addr, tmp, (tmp & pdn_ack) == pdn_ack, - MTK_POLL_DELAY_US, MTK_POLL_TIMEOUT); + ret = scpsys_sram_disable(scpd, ctl_addr); if (ret < 0) goto out; - val |= PWR_ISO_BIT; + /* subsys power off */ + val = readl(ctl_addr) | PWR_ISO_BIT; writel(val, ctl_addr); val &= ~PWR_RST_B_BIT;
Put sram enable and disable control in separate functions. Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com> --- drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)