diff mbox series

drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: Fall back to HPD polling if HPD irq is not available

Message ID 20190401123342.15767-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series drm/bridge: ti-tfp410: Fall back to HPD polling if HPD irq is not available | expand

Commit Message

Peter Ujfalusi April 1, 2019, 12:33 p.m. UTC
In case either the HPD gpio is not specified or when the HPD gpio can not
be used as interrupt we should tell the core that the HPD needs to be
polled for detecting hotplug.

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Laurent Pinchart April 2, 2019, 11:21 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Peter,

Thank you for the patch.

On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:33:42PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> In case either the HPD gpio is not specified or when the HPD gpio can not
> be used as interrupt we should tell the core that the HPD needs to be
> polled for detecting hotplug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> index 285be4a0f4bd..6fc831eb3804 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct tfp410 {
>  
>  	struct i2c_adapter	*ddc;
>  	struct gpio_desc	*hpd;
> +	int			hpd_irq;
>  	struct delayed_work	hpd_work;
>  	struct gpio_desc	*powerdown;
>  
> @@ -124,8 +125,10 @@ static int tfp410_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (dvi->hpd)
> +	if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0)

Do you need a new hpd_irq field ? Can't you just test dvi->hpd as done
today, simply adding the else clause to this if ?

>  		dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
> +	else
> +		dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_CONNECT | DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_DISCONNECT;
>  
>  	drm_connector_helper_add(&dvi->connector,
>  				 &tfp410_con_helper_funcs);
> @@ -324,10 +327,15 @@ static int tfp410_init(struct device *dev, bool i2c)
>  		return PTR_ERR(dvi->powerdown);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (dvi->hpd) {
> +	if (dvi->hpd)
> +		dvi->hpd_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dvi->hpd);
> +	else
> +		dvi->hpd_irq = -ENXIO;
> +
> +	if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0) {
>  		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dvi->hpd_work, tfp410_hpd_work_func);
>  
> -		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, gpiod_to_irq(dvi->hpd),
> +		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, dvi->hpd_irq,
>  			NULL, tfp410_hpd_irq_thread, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING |
>  			IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>  			"hdmi-hpd", dvi);
Peter Ujfalusi April 2, 2019, 1:10 p.m. UTC | #2
On 02/04/2019 14.21, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:33:42PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> In case either the HPD gpio is not specified or when the HPD gpio can not
>> be used as interrupt we should tell the core that the HPD needs to be
>> polled for detecting hotplug.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
>> index 285be4a0f4bd..6fc831eb3804 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct tfp410 {
>>  
>>  	struct i2c_adapter	*ddc;
>>  	struct gpio_desc	*hpd;
>> +	int			hpd_irq;
>>  	struct delayed_work	hpd_work;
>>  	struct gpio_desc	*powerdown;
>>  
>> @@ -124,8 +125,10 @@ static int tfp410_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (dvi->hpd)
>> +	if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0)
> 
> Do you need a new hpd_irq field ? Can't you just test dvi->hpd as done
> today, simply adding the else clause to this if ?

We can have hpd GPIO, but the GPIO might not be usable for interrupt.

> 
>>  		dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
>> +	else
>> +		dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_CONNECT | DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_DISCONNECT;
>>  
>>  	drm_connector_helper_add(&dvi->connector,
>>  				 &tfp410_con_helper_funcs);
>> @@ -324,10 +327,15 @@ static int tfp410_init(struct device *dev, bool i2c)
>>  		return PTR_ERR(dvi->powerdown);
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	if (dvi->hpd) {
>> +	if (dvi->hpd)
>> +		dvi->hpd_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dvi->hpd);
>> +	else
>> +		dvi->hpd_irq = -ENXIO;
>> +
>> +	if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0) {
>>  		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dvi->hpd_work, tfp410_hpd_work_func);
>>  
>> -		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, gpiod_to_irq(dvi->hpd),
>> +		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, dvi->hpd_irq,
>>  			NULL, tfp410_hpd_irq_thread, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING |
>>  			IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>>  			"hdmi-hpd", dvi);
> 

- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Laurent Pinchart April 4, 2019, 2:09 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Peter,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:10:41PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 02/04/2019 14.21, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:33:42PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> In case either the HPD gpio is not specified or when the HPD gpio can not
> >> be used as interrupt we should tell the core that the HPD needs to be
> >> polled for detecting hotplug.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> >>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> >> index 285be4a0f4bd..6fc831eb3804 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> >> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct tfp410 {
> >>  
> >>  	struct i2c_adapter	*ddc;
> >>  	struct gpio_desc	*hpd;
> >> +	int			hpd_irq;
> >>  	struct delayed_work	hpd_work;
> >>  	struct gpio_desc	*powerdown;
> >>  
> >> @@ -124,8 +125,10 @@ static int tfp410_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> >>  		return -ENODEV;
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -	if (dvi->hpd)
> >> +	if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0)
> > 
> > Do you need a new hpd_irq field ? Can't you just test dvi->hpd as done
> > today, simply adding the else clause to this if ?
> 
> We can have hpd GPIO, but the GPIO might not be usable for interrupt.

Ah, good point. I hadn't understood that from the commit message. Maybe
an additional sentence pointing out that not all GPIOs can be used as
IRQs would be useful.

Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> >>  		dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
> >> +	else
> >> +		dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_CONNECT | DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_DISCONNECT;
> >>  
> >>  	drm_connector_helper_add(&dvi->connector,
> >>  				 &tfp410_con_helper_funcs);
> >> @@ -324,10 +327,15 @@ static int tfp410_init(struct device *dev, bool i2c)
> >>  		return PTR_ERR(dvi->powerdown);
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -	if (dvi->hpd) {
> >> +	if (dvi->hpd)
> >> +		dvi->hpd_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dvi->hpd);
> >> +	else
> >> +		dvi->hpd_irq = -ENXIO;
> >> +
> >> +	if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0) {
> >>  		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dvi->hpd_work, tfp410_hpd_work_func);
> >>  
> >> -		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, gpiod_to_irq(dvi->hpd),
> >> +		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, dvi->hpd_irq,
> >>  			NULL, tfp410_hpd_irq_thread, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING |
> >>  			IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> >>  			"hdmi-hpd", dvi);
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
index 285be4a0f4bd..6fc831eb3804 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@  struct tfp410 {
 
 	struct i2c_adapter	*ddc;
 	struct gpio_desc	*hpd;
+	int			hpd_irq;
 	struct delayed_work	hpd_work;
 	struct gpio_desc	*powerdown;
 
@@ -124,8 +125,10 @@  static int tfp410_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	if (dvi->hpd)
+	if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0)
 		dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
+	else
+		dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_CONNECT | DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_DISCONNECT;
 
 	drm_connector_helper_add(&dvi->connector,
 				 &tfp410_con_helper_funcs);
@@ -324,10 +327,15 @@  static int tfp410_init(struct device *dev, bool i2c)
 		return PTR_ERR(dvi->powerdown);
 	}
 
-	if (dvi->hpd) {
+	if (dvi->hpd)
+		dvi->hpd_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dvi->hpd);
+	else
+		dvi->hpd_irq = -ENXIO;
+
+	if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0) {
 		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dvi->hpd_work, tfp410_hpd_work_func);
 
-		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, gpiod_to_irq(dvi->hpd),
+		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, dvi->hpd_irq,
 			NULL, tfp410_hpd_irq_thread, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING |
 			IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
 			"hdmi-hpd", dvi);