@@ -1102,7 +1102,7 @@ struct cftype bfq_blkcg_legacy_files[] = {
},
#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP */
- /* the same statictics which cover the bfqg and its descendants */
+ /* the same statistics which cover the bfqg and its descendants */
{
.name = "io_service_bytes_recursive",
.private = (unsigned long)&blkcg_policy_bfq,
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static const int bfq_default_max_budget = 16 * 1024;
/*
* When a sync request is dispatched, the queue that contains that
* request, and all the ancestor entities of that queue, are charged
- * with the number of sectors of the request. In constrast, if the
+ * with the number of sectors of the request. In contrast, if the
* request is async, then the queue and its ancestor entities are
* charged with the number of sectors of the request, multiplied by
* the factor below. This throttles the bandwidth for async I/O,
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ const int bfq_timeout = HZ / 8;
* queue merging.
*
* As can be deduced from the low time limit below, queue merging, if
- * successful, happens at the very beggining of the I/O of the involved
+ * successful, happens at the very beginning of the I/O of the involved
* cooperating processes, as a consequence of the arrival of the very
* first requests from each cooperator. After that, there is very
* little chance to find cooperators.
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ void bfq_schedule_dispatch(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
/*
* Lifted from AS - choose which of rq1 and rq2 that is best served now.
- * We choose the request that is closesr to the head right now. Distance
+ * We choose the request that is closer to the head right now. Distance
* behind the head is penalized and only allowed to a certain extent.
*/
static struct request *bfq_choose_req(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
@@ -955,7 +955,7 @@ static unsigned int bfq_wr_duration(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
* of several files
* mplayer took 23 seconds to start, if constantly weight-raised.
*
- * As for higher values than that accomodating the above bad
+ * As for higher values than that accommodating the above bad
* scenario, tests show that higher values would often yield
* the opposite of the desired result, i.e., would worsen
* responsiveness by allowing non-interactive applications to
@@ -2408,8 +2408,8 @@ static bool bfq_allow_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
/*
* bic still points to bfqq, then it has not yet been
* redirected to some other bfq_queue, and a queue
- * merge beween bfqq and new_bfqq can be safely
- * fulfillled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq
+ * merge between bfqq and new_bfqq can be safely
+ * fulfilled, i.e., bic can be redirected to new_bfqq
* and bfqq can be put.
*/
bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, bfqd->bio_bic, bfqq,
@@ -2855,7 +2855,7 @@ static void __bfq_bfqq_expire(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
/*
* All in-service entities must have been properly deactivated
* or requeued before executing the next function, which
- * resets all in-service entites as no more in service.
+ * resets all in-service entities as no more in service.
*/
__bfq_bfqd_reset_in_service(bfqd);
}
@@ -5157,7 +5157,7 @@ static void bfq_prepare_request(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
* preparation is that, after the prepare_request hook is invoked for
* rq, rq may still be transformed into a request with no icq, i.e., a
* request not associated with any queue. No bfq hook is invoked to
- * signal this tranformation. As a consequence, should these
+ * signal this transformation. As a consequence, should these
* preparation operations be performed when the prepare_request hook
* is invoked, and should rq be transformed one moment later, bfq
* would end up in an inconsistent state, because it would have
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct bfq_service_tree {
* expiration. This peculiar definition allows for the following
* optimization, not yet exploited: while a given entity is still in
* service, we already know which is the best candidate for next
- * service among the other active entitities in the same parent
+ * service among the other active entities in the same parent
* entity. We can then quickly compare the timestamps of the
* in-service entity with those of such best candidate.
*
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ struct bfq_weight_counter {
*
* Unless cgroups are used, the weight value is calculated from the
* ioprio to export the same interface as CFQ. When dealing with
- * ``well-behaved'' queues (i.e., queues that do not spend too much
+ * "well-behaved" queues (i.e., queues that do not spend too much
* time to consume their budget and have true sequential behavior, and
* when there are no external factors breaking anticipation) the
* relative weights at each level of the cgroups hierarchy should be
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static bool bfq_update_parent_budget(struct bfq_entity *next_in_service);
* bfq_update_next_in_service - update sd->next_in_service
* @sd: sched_data for which to perform the update.
* @new_entity: if not NULL, pointer to the entity whose activation,
- * requeueing or repositionig triggered the invocation of
+ * requeueing or repositioning triggered the invocation of
* this function.
* @expiration: id true, this function is being invoked after the
* expiration of the in-service entity
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static bool bfq_update_next_in_service(struct bfq_sched_data *sd,
/*
* If this update is triggered by the activation, requeueing
- * or repositiong of an entity that does not coincide with
+ * or repositioning of an entity that does not coincide with
* sd->next_in_service, then a full lookup in the active tree
* can be avoided. In fact, it is enough to check whether the
* just-modified entity has the same priority as
@@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ static struct bfq_entity *bfq_first_active_entity(struct bfq_service_tree *st,
* In this first case, update the virtual time in @st too (see the
* comments on this update inside the function).
*
- * In constrast, if there is an in-service entity, then return the
+ * In contrast, if there is an in-service entity, then return the
* entity that would be set in service if not only the above
* conditions, but also the next one held true: the currently
* in-service entity, on expiration,
@@ -1479,12 +1479,12 @@ static struct bfq_entity *bfq_lookup_next_entity(struct bfq_sched_data *sd,
* is being invoked as a part of the expiration path
* of the in-service queue. In this case, even if
* sd->in_service_entity is not NULL,
- * sd->in_service_entiy at this point is actually not
+ * sd->in_service_entity at this point is actually not
* in service any more, and, if needed, has already
* been properly queued or requeued into the right
* tree. The reason why sd->in_service_entity is still
* not NULL here, even if expiration is true, is that
- * sd->in_service_entiy is reset as a last step in the
+ * sd->in_service_entity is reset as a last step in the
* expiration path. So, if expiration is true, tell
* __bfq_lookup_next_entity that there is no
* sd->in_service_entity.