| Message ID | 20190212095343.23315-1-mhocko@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes | expand |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:53:41AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > Hi, > this has been posted as an RFC previously [1]. There didn't seem to be > any objections so I am reposting this for inclusion. I have added a > debugging patch which prints the zonelist setup for each numa node > for an easier debugging of a broken zonelist setup. > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190114082416.30939-1-mhocko@kernel.org FWIW, Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> for the series.
On Tue 12-02-19 10:53:41, Michal Hocko wrote: > Hi, > this has been posted as an RFC previously [1]. There didn't seem to be > any objections so I am reposting this for inclusion. I have added a > debugging patch which prints the zonelist setup for each numa node > for an easier debugging of a broken zonelist setup. > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190114082416.30939-1-mhocko@kernel.org Friendly ping. I haven't heard any complains so can we route this via tip/x86/mm or should we go via mmotm.
On Tue 26-02-19 14:12:01, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 12-02-19 10:53:41, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Hi, > > this has been posted as an RFC previously [1]. There didn't seem to be > > any objections so I am reposting this for inclusion. I have added a > > debugging patch which prints the zonelist setup for each numa node > > for an easier debugging of a broken zonelist setup. > > > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190114082416.30939-1-mhocko@kernel.org > > Friendly ping. I haven't heard any complains so can we route this via > tip/x86/mm or should we go via mmotm. It seems that Dave is busy. Let's add Andrew. Can we get this [1] merged finally, please? [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190212095343.23315-1-mhocko@kernel.org
On 4/15/19 4:42 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> Friendly ping. I haven't heard any complains so can we route this via >> tip/x86/mm or should we go via mmotm. > It seems that Dave is busy. Let's add Andrew. Can we get this [1] merged > finally, please? Sorry these slipped through the cracks. These look sane to me. Because it pokes around mm/page_alloc.c a bit, and could impact other architectures, my preference would be for Andrew to pick these up for -mm. But, I don't feel that strongly about it. Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Forgot to cc Andrew. Now for real. Andrew please note that Dave has reviewed the patch http://lkml.kernel.org/r/77b364e5-a30c-964a-6985-00b759dac128@intel.com Or do you want me to resubmit? On Mon 15-04-19 13:42:09, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 26-02-19 14:12:01, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Tue 12-02-19 10:53:41, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > Hi, > > > this has been posted as an RFC previously [1]. There didn't seem to be > > > any objections so I am reposting this for inclusion. I have added a > > > debugging patch which prints the zonelist setup for each numa node > > > for an easier debugging of a broken zonelist setup. > > > > > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190114082416.30939-1-mhocko@kernel.org > > > > Friendly ping. I haven't heard any complains so can we route this via > > tip/x86/mm or should we go via mmotm. > > It seems that Dave is busy. Let's add Andrew. Can we get this [1] merged > finally, please? > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190212095343.23315-1-mhocko@kernel.org