| Message ID | 20190412125136.28232-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | arm64: meson: g12a: add audio devices | expand |
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes: > This patchset adds most the audio devices of the g12a SoCs. > > Kevin, couple of things worth noting: > * This patch depends of the new audio clocks binding recently applied > by Neil [0]. Was this supposed to be part of the clk-headers dependency PR I received? /me looks... It looks like it's applied right after the tag I pulled, so I doesn't look like it. If I should queue $SUBJECT series up for 5.2, I'll need another stable tag. Kevin
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:52 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote: > > Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes: > > > This patchset adds most the audio devices of the g12a SoCs. > > > > Kevin, couple of things worth noting: > > * This patch depends of the new audio clocks binding recently applied > > by Neil [0]. > > Was this supposed to be part of the clk-headers dependency PR I > received? /me looks... It looks like it's applied right after the tag I > pulled, so I doesn't look like it. > > If I should queue $SUBJECT series up for 5.2, I'll need another stable > tag. Also, this doesn't apply cleanly anymore to my v5.2/dt64 branch. When the stable tag is ready, do you mind doing a rebase? (or telling me what it currently applies to, and I will do the rebase.) Thanks, Kevin
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 12:22 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:52 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote: > > Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes: > > > > > This patchset adds most the audio devices of the g12a SoCs. > > > > > > Kevin, couple of things worth noting: > > > * This patch depends of the new audio clocks binding recently applied > > > by Neil [0]. > > > > Was this supposed to be part of the clk-headers dependency PR I > > received? /me looks... It looks like it's applied right after the tag I > > pulled, so I doesn't look like it. > > > > If I should queue $SUBJECT series up for 5.2, I'll need another stable > > tag. > > Also, this doesn't apply cleanly anymore to my v5.2/dt64 branch. When > the stable tag is ready, do you mind doing a rebase? (or telling me > what it currently applies to, and I will do the rebase.) Hi Kevin, Until we have a solution for the drive strength in pinctrl, I won't be able to submit the audio pins. I doubt it will happen in this cycle. Without the pins, audio won't work anyway ... so no rush If it is ok with you, I'll resend at the beginning of the next cycle. Clk and ASoC deps will be merged by then, so things should be more straight forward. > > Thanks, > > Kevin
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes: > On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 12:22 -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:52 AM Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote: >> > Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> writes: >> > >> > > This patchset adds most the audio devices of the g12a SoCs. >> > > >> > > Kevin, couple of things worth noting: >> > > * This patch depends of the new audio clocks binding recently applied >> > > by Neil [0]. >> > >> > Was this supposed to be part of the clk-headers dependency PR I >> > received? /me looks... It looks like it's applied right after the tag I >> > pulled, so I doesn't look like it. >> > >> > If I should queue $SUBJECT series up for 5.2, I'll need another stable >> > tag. >> >> Also, this doesn't apply cleanly anymore to my v5.2/dt64 branch. When >> the stable tag is ready, do you mind doing a rebase? (or telling me >> what it currently applies to, and I will do the rebase.) > > Hi Kevin, > > Until we have a solution for the drive strength in pinctrl, I won't be able to > submit the audio pins. I doubt it will happen in this cycle. > > Without the pins, audio won't work anyway ... so no rush > > If it is ok with you, I'll resend at the beginning of the next cycle. Clk and > ASoC deps will be merged by then, so things should be more straight forward. Works for me, thanks. Kevin