Message ID | 20190426103332.9036-1-phillip.wood123@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | rebase -r: always reword merge -c | expand |
Hi Phillip, On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Phillip Wood wrote: > From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> > > If a merge can be fast-forwarded then make sure that we still edit the > commit message if the user specifies -c. The implementation follows the > same pattern that is used for ordinary rewords that are fast-forwarded. > > Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> > --- OMG I was bitten twice by this very bug in the past week, and planned on looking into it next week. Thanks for beating me to it. Two comments: > diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c > index 0db410d590..ff8565e7a8 100644 > --- a/sequencer.c > +++ b/sequencer.c > @@ -3248,6 +3248,10 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r, > rollback_lock_file(&lock); > ret = fast_forward_to(r, &commit->object.oid, > &head_commit->object.oid, 0, opts); > + if (flags & TODO_EDIT_MERGE_MSG) { > + run_commit_flags |= AMEND_MSG; > + goto fast_forward_edit; > + } > goto leave_merge; > } > > @@ -3351,6 +3355,7 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r, > * value (a negative one would indicate that the `merge` > * command needs to be rescheduled). > */ > + fast_forward_edit: It is *slightly* awkward that this is an `else` arm of an `if (ret)`, but I do not necessarily think that it would be better to move the label before the `if` than what you did; Your version comes out more readable, still. > ret = !!run_git_commit(r, git_path_merge_msg(r), opts, > run_commit_flags); > > diff --git a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh b/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh > index 4c69255ee6..3d484a3c72 100755 > --- a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh > +++ b/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh > @@ -164,6 +164,16 @@ test_expect_success 'failed `merge <branch>` does not crash' ' > grep "^Merge branch ${SQ}G${SQ}$" .git/rebase-merge/message > ' > > +test_expect_success 'fast-forward merge -c still rewords' ' > + git checkout -b fast-forward-merge-c H && > + set_fake_editor && set_fake_editor affects global state AFAIR (setting and exporting `EDITOR`), therefore this would need to be run in a subshell, i.e. enclosed in parentheses. > + FAKE_COMMIT_MESSAGE=edited GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR="echo merge -c H G >" \ > + git rebase -ir @^ && > + echo edited >expected && > + git log --pretty=format:%B -1 >actual && > + test_cmp expected actual > +' > + The rest looks good, thank you! Dscho > test_expect_success 'with a branch tip that was cherry-picked already' ' > git checkout -b already-upstream master && > base="$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD)" && > -- > 2.21.0 > >
Hi Dscho On 29/04/2019 17:14, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Phillip, > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Phillip Wood wrote: > >> From: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> >> >> If a merge can be fast-forwarded then make sure that we still edit the >> commit message if the user specifies -c. The implementation follows the >> same pattern that is used for ordinary rewords that are fast-forwarded. >> >> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> >> --- > > OMG I was bitten twice by this very bug in the past week, and planned on > looking into it next week. Thanks for beating me to it. > > Two comments: > >> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c >> index 0db410d590..ff8565e7a8 100644 >> --- a/sequencer.c >> +++ b/sequencer.c >> @@ -3248,6 +3248,10 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r, >> rollback_lock_file(&lock); >> ret = fast_forward_to(r, &commit->object.oid, >> &head_commit->object.oid, 0, opts); >> + if (flags & TODO_EDIT_MERGE_MSG) { >> + run_commit_flags |= AMEND_MSG; >> + goto fast_forward_edit; >> + } >> goto leave_merge; >> } >> >> @@ -3351,6 +3355,7 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r, >> * value (a negative one would indicate that the `merge` >> * command needs to be rescheduled). >> */ >> + fast_forward_edit: > > It is *slightly* awkward that this is an `else` arm of an `if (ret)`, but > I do not necessarily think that it would be better to move the label > before the `if` than what you did; Your version comes out more readable, > still. I did wonder about adding braces but I'm not sure that makes it any clearer. I agree having the label before the `if (ret)` would be less clear as the reader has to then think what ret will be in that case to work out what will happen. >> ret = !!run_git_commit(r, git_path_merge_msg(r), opts, >> run_commit_flags); >> >> diff --git a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh b/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh >> index 4c69255ee6..3d484a3c72 100755 >> --- a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh >> +++ b/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh >> @@ -164,6 +164,16 @@ test_expect_success 'failed `merge <branch>` does not crash' ' >> grep "^Merge branch ${SQ}G${SQ}$" .git/rebase-merge/message >> ' >> >> +test_expect_success 'fast-forward merge -c still rewords' ' >> + git checkout -b fast-forward-merge-c H && >> + set_fake_editor && > > set_fake_editor affects global state AFAIR (setting and exporting > `EDITOR`), therefore this would need to be run in a subshell, i.e. > enclosed in parentheses. The other test files are not very consistent about that. I'll re-roll. Note that I do not export any FAKE_* variables, so later tests should not be affected even if the fake editor runs. Best Wishes Phillip >> + FAKE_COMMIT_MESSAGE=edited GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR="echo merge -c H G >" \ >> + git rebase -ir @^ && >> + echo edited >expected && >> + git log --pretty=format:%B -1 >actual && >> + test_cmp expected actual >> +' >> + > > The rest looks good, thank you! > Dscho > >> test_expect_success 'with a branch tip that was cherry-picked already' ' >> git checkout -b already-upstream master && >> base="$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD)" && >> -- >> 2.21.0 >> >>
Hi Phillip, On Tue, 30 Apr 2019, Phillip Wood wrote: > On 29/04/2019 17:14, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > Hi Phillip, > > > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Phillip Wood wrote: > > > > > ret = !!run_git_commit(r, git_path_merge_msg(r), opts, > > > run_commit_flags); > > > > > > diff --git a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh b/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh > > > index 4c69255ee6..3d484a3c72 100755 > > > --- a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh > > > +++ b/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh > > > @@ -164,6 +164,16 @@ test_expect_success 'failed `merge <branch>` does not > > > crash' ' > > > grep "^Merge branch ${SQ}G${SQ}$" .git/rebase-merge/message > > > ' > > > > > > +test_expect_success 'fast-forward merge -c still rewords' ' > > > + git checkout -b fast-forward-merge-c H && > > > + set_fake_editor && > > > > set_fake_editor affects global state AFAIR (setting and exporting > > `EDITOR`), therefore this would need to be run in a subshell, i.e. > > enclosed in parentheses. > > The other test files are not very consistent about that. I'll re-roll. Note > that I do not export any FAKE_* variables, so later tests should not be > affected even if the fake editor runs. AFAIR I tried my best to avoid `set_fake_editor` altogether and instead preferred `write_script`/`test_config core.editor` combos in t3430. Ciao, Dscho
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c index 0db410d590..ff8565e7a8 100644 --- a/sequencer.c +++ b/sequencer.c @@ -3248,6 +3248,10 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r, rollback_lock_file(&lock); ret = fast_forward_to(r, &commit->object.oid, &head_commit->object.oid, 0, opts); + if (flags & TODO_EDIT_MERGE_MSG) { + run_commit_flags |= AMEND_MSG; + goto fast_forward_edit; + } goto leave_merge; } @@ -3351,6 +3355,7 @@ static int do_merge(struct repository *r, * value (a negative one would indicate that the `merge` * command needs to be rescheduled). */ + fast_forward_edit: ret = !!run_git_commit(r, git_path_merge_msg(r), opts, run_commit_flags); diff --git a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh b/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh index 4c69255ee6..3d484a3c72 100755 --- a/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh +++ b/t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh @@ -164,6 +164,16 @@ test_expect_success 'failed `merge <branch>` does not crash' ' grep "^Merge branch ${SQ}G${SQ}$" .git/rebase-merge/message ' +test_expect_success 'fast-forward merge -c still rewords' ' + git checkout -b fast-forward-merge-c H && + set_fake_editor && + FAKE_COMMIT_MESSAGE=edited GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR="echo merge -c H G >" \ + git rebase -ir @^ && + echo edited >expected && + git log --pretty=format:%B -1 >actual && + test_cmp expected actual +' + test_expect_success 'with a branch tip that was cherry-picked already' ' git checkout -b already-upstream master && base="$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD)" &&