diff mbox series

[v3,7/8] virtio/s390: use DMA memory for ccw I/O and classic notifiers

Message ID 20190529122657.166148-8-mimu@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series s390: virtio: support protected virtualization | expand

Commit Message

Michael Mueller May 29, 2019, 12:26 p.m. UTC
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>

Before virtio-ccw could get away with not using DMA API for the pieces of
memory it does ccw I/O with. With protected virtualization this has to
change, since the hypervisor needs to read and sometimes also write these
pieces of memory.

The hypervisor is supposed to poke the classic notifiers, if these are
used, out of band with regards to ccw I/O. So these need to be allocated
as DMA memory (which is shared memory for protected virtualization
guests).

Let us factor out everything from struct virtio_ccw_device that needs to
be DMA memory in a satellite that is allocated as such.

Note: The control blocks of I/O instructions do not need to be shared.
These are marshalled by the ultravisor.

Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 177 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)

Comments

Cornelia Huck June 3, 2019, 4:17 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 29 May 2019 14:26:56 +0200
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Before virtio-ccw could get away with not using DMA API for the pieces of
> memory it does ccw I/O with. With protected virtualization this has to
> change, since the hypervisor needs to read and sometimes also write these
> pieces of memory.
> 
> The hypervisor is supposed to poke the classic notifiers, if these are
> used, out of band with regards to ccw I/O. So these need to be allocated
> as DMA memory (which is shared memory for protected virtualization
> guests).
> 
> Let us factor out everything from struct virtio_ccw_device that needs to
> be DMA memory in a satellite that is allocated as such.
> 
> Note: The control blocks of I/O instructions do not need to be shared.
> These are marshalled by the ultravisor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 177 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> 

(...)

> @@ -176,6 +180,22 @@ static struct virtio_ccw_device *to_vc_device(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	return container_of(vdev, struct virtio_ccw_device, vdev);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void *__vc_dma_alloc(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size)
> +{
> +	return ccw_device_dma_zalloc(to_vc_device(vdev)->cdev, size);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void __vc_dma_free(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size,
> +				 void *cpu_addr)
> +{
> +	return ccw_device_dma_free(to_vc_device(vdev)->cdev, cpu_addr, size);
> +}
> +
> +#define vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ptr) \
> +	({ptr = __vc_dma_alloc(vdev, sizeof(*(ptr))); })
> +#define vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ptr) \
> +	__vc_dma_free(vdev, sizeof(*(ptr)), (ptr))
> +

I *still* don't like these #defines (and the __vc_dma_* functions), as I
already commented last time. I think they make it harder to follow the
code.

>  static void drop_airq_indicator(struct virtqueue *vq, struct airq_info *info)
>  {
>  	unsigned long i, flags;
> @@ -336,8 +356,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
>  	struct airq_info *airq_info = vcdev->airq_info;
>  
>  	if (vcdev->is_thinint) {
> -		thinint_area = kzalloc(sizeof(*thinint_area),
> -				       GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
> +		vc_dma_alloc_struct(&vcdev->vdev, thinint_area);

Last time I wrote:

"Any reason why this takes a detour via the virtio device? The ccw
 device is already referenced in vcdev, isn't it?

thinint_area = ccw_device_dma_zalloc(vcdev->cdev, sizeof(*thinint_area));

 looks much more obvious to me."

It still seems more obvious to me.

>  		if (!thinint_area)
>  			return;
>  		thinint_area->summary_indicator =
Halil Pasic June 4, 2019, 1:08 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:17:16 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 29 May 2019 14:26:56 +0200
> Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Before virtio-ccw could get away with not using DMA API for the pieces of
> > memory it does ccw I/O with. With protected virtualization this has to
> > change, since the hypervisor needs to read and sometimes also write these
> > pieces of memory.
> > 
> > The hypervisor is supposed to poke the classic notifiers, if these are
> > used, out of band with regards to ccw I/O. So these need to be allocated
> > as DMA memory (which is shared memory for protected virtualization
> > guests).
> > 
> > Let us factor out everything from struct virtio_ccw_device that needs to
> > be DMA memory in a satellite that is allocated as such.
> > 
> > Note: The control blocks of I/O instructions do not need to be shared.
> > These are marshalled by the ultravisor.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 177 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> (...)
> 
> > @@ -176,6 +180,22 @@ static struct virtio_ccw_device *to_vc_device(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >  	return container_of(vdev, struct virtio_ccw_device, vdev);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline void *__vc_dma_alloc(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size)
> > +{
> > +	return ccw_device_dma_zalloc(to_vc_device(vdev)->cdev, size);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void __vc_dma_free(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size,
> > +				 void *cpu_addr)
> > +{
> > +	return ccw_device_dma_free(to_vc_device(vdev)->cdev, cpu_addr, size);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ptr) \
> > +	({ptr = __vc_dma_alloc(vdev, sizeof(*(ptr))); })
> > +#define vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ptr) \
> > +	__vc_dma_free(vdev, sizeof(*(ptr)), (ptr))
> > +
> 
> I *still* don't like these #defines (and the __vc_dma_* functions), as I
> already commented last time. I think they make it harder to follow the
> code.
> 

Sorry! I think we simply forgot to address this comment of yours. 

> >  static void drop_airq_indicator(struct virtqueue *vq, struct airq_info *info)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long i, flags;
> > @@ -336,8 +356,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> >  	struct airq_info *airq_info = vcdev->airq_info;
> >  
> >  	if (vcdev->is_thinint) {
> > -		thinint_area = kzalloc(sizeof(*thinint_area),
> > -				       GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		vc_dma_alloc_struct(&vcdev->vdev, thinint_area);
> 
> Last time I wrote:
> 
> "Any reason why this takes a detour via the virtio device? The ccw
>  device is already referenced in vcdev, isn't it?
>
> thinint_area = ccw_device_dma_zalloc(vcdev->cdev, sizeof(*thinint_area));
> 
>  looks much more obvious to me."
> 
> It still seems more obvious to me.
>


The reason why I decided to introduce __vc_dma_alloc() back then is
because I had no clarity what do we want to do there. If you take a look
the body of __vc_dma_alloc() changed quite a lot, while I the usage not
so much. 

Regarding why is the first argument a pointer struct virtio_device, the
idea was probably to keep the needs to be ZONE_DMA and can use the full
64 bit address space separate. But I abandoned the ideal.

Also vc_dma_alloc_struct() started out more elaborate (I used to manage
a dma_addr_t as well -- see RFC).

I'm not quite sure what is your problem with the these. As far as I
understand, this is another of those matter of taste things. But it ain't
a big deal. 

I will change this for v4 as you requested. Again sorry for missing it!

Regards,
Halil

 
> >  		if (!thinint_area)
> >  			return;
> >  		thinint_area->summary_indicator =
>
Cornelia Huck June 4, 2019, 1:36 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:08:19 +0200
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:17:16 +0200
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 29 May 2019 14:26:56 +0200
> > Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> > (...)
> >   
> > > @@ -176,6 +180,22 @@ static struct virtio_ccw_device *to_vc_device(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > >  	return container_of(vdev, struct virtio_ccw_device, vdev);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static inline void *__vc_dma_alloc(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size)
> > > +{
> > > +	return ccw_device_dma_zalloc(to_vc_device(vdev)->cdev, size);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void __vc_dma_free(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size,
> > > +				 void *cpu_addr)
> > > +{
> > > +	return ccw_device_dma_free(to_vc_device(vdev)->cdev, cpu_addr, size);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +#define vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ptr) \
> > > +	({ptr = __vc_dma_alloc(vdev, sizeof(*(ptr))); })
> > > +#define vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ptr) \
> > > +	__vc_dma_free(vdev, sizeof(*(ptr)), (ptr))
> > > +  
> > 
> > I *still* don't like these #defines (and the __vc_dma_* functions), as I
> > already commented last time. I think they make it harder to follow the
> > code.
> >   
> 
> Sorry! I think we simply forgot to address this comment of yours. 
> 
> > >  static void drop_airq_indicator(struct virtqueue *vq, struct airq_info *info)
> > >  {
> > >  	unsigned long i, flags;
> > > @@ -336,8 +356,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> > >  	struct airq_info *airq_info = vcdev->airq_info;
> > >  
> > >  	if (vcdev->is_thinint) {
> > > -		thinint_area = kzalloc(sizeof(*thinint_area),
> > > -				       GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +		vc_dma_alloc_struct(&vcdev->vdev, thinint_area);  
> > 
> > Last time I wrote:
> > 
> > "Any reason why this takes a detour via the virtio device? The ccw
> >  device is already referenced in vcdev, isn't it?
> >
> > thinint_area = ccw_device_dma_zalloc(vcdev->cdev, sizeof(*thinint_area));
> > 
> >  looks much more obvious to me."
> > 
> > It still seems more obvious to me.
> >  
> 
> 
> The reason why I decided to introduce __vc_dma_alloc() back then is
> because I had no clarity what do we want to do there. If you take a look
> the body of __vc_dma_alloc() changed quite a lot, while I the usage not
> so much. 
> 
> Regarding why is the first argument a pointer struct virtio_device, the
> idea was probably to keep the needs to be ZONE_DMA and can use the full
> 64 bit address space separate. But I abandoned the ideal.
> 
> Also vc_dma_alloc_struct() started out more elaborate (I used to manage
> a dma_addr_t as well -- see RFC).

Understood, history is often important :)

> 
> I'm not quite sure what is your problem with the these. As far as I
> understand, this is another of those matter of taste things. But it ain't
> a big deal. 

Two things:
- The call path goes from the vcdev to the vdev, then back to the vcdev
  and then to the cdev. Going from the vcdev to the cdev  directly
  eliminates the roundtrip via the vdev, which I think does not add
  anything.
- I prefer
	variable = function_returning_a_pointer(...);
  over
	function_setting_a_variable(..., variable);
  The latter obscures the fact that we change the value of the
  variable, unless named very obviously.

> 
> I will change this for v4 as you requested. Again sorry for missing it!

np, can happen.

> 
> Regards,
> Halil
> 
>  
> > >  		if (!thinint_area)
> > >  			return;
> > >  		thinint_area->summary_indicator =  
> >   
>
Halil Pasic June 4, 2019, 2:29 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:36:25 +0200
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 15:08:19 +0200
> Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 

[..]

> 
> Two things:
> - The call path goes from the vcdev to the vdev, then back to the vcdev
>   and then to the cdev. Going from the vcdev to the cdev  directly
>   eliminates the roundtrip via the vdev, which I think does not add
>   anything.
> - I prefer
> 	variable = function_returning_a_pointer(...);
>   over
> 	function_setting_a_variable(..., variable);
>   The latter obscures the fact that we change the value of the
>   variable, unless named very obviously.
> 

I understand. Here it's especially bad because what looks like a
function is actually a macro so it ain't even fn(..., &variable) but
just fn(..., variable). I guess I'm a bit desensitized towards the latter
because of my c++ background.


> > 
> > I will change this for v4 as you requested. Again sorry for missing it!
> 
> np, can happen.

Thanks for the explanation. I will use

ccw_device_dma_zalloc() directly in v4.

Regards,
Halil
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
index e96a8cc56ec2..03c9f7001fb1 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
@@ -46,9 +46,15 @@  struct vq_config_block {
 #define VIRTIO_CCW_CONFIG_SIZE 0x100
 /* same as PCI config space size, should be enough for all drivers */
 
+struct vcdev_dma_area {
+	unsigned long indicators;
+	unsigned long indicators2;
+	struct vq_config_block config_block;
+	__u8 status;
+};
+
 struct virtio_ccw_device {
 	struct virtio_device vdev;
-	__u8 *status;
 	__u8 config[VIRTIO_CCW_CONFIG_SIZE];
 	struct ccw_device *cdev;
 	__u32 curr_io;
@@ -58,24 +64,22 @@  struct virtio_ccw_device {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	struct mutex io_lock; /* Serializes I/O requests */
 	struct list_head virtqueues;
-	unsigned long indicators;
-	unsigned long indicators2;
-	struct vq_config_block *config_block;
 	bool is_thinint;
 	bool going_away;
 	bool device_lost;
 	unsigned int config_ready;
 	void *airq_info;
+	struct vcdev_dma_area *dma_area;
 };
 
 static inline unsigned long *indicators(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
 {
-	return &vcdev->indicators;
+	return &vcdev->dma_area->indicators;
 }
 
 static inline unsigned long *indicators2(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
 {
-	return &vcdev->indicators2;
+	return &vcdev->dma_area->indicators2;
 }
 
 struct vq_info_block_legacy {
@@ -176,6 +180,22 @@  static struct virtio_ccw_device *to_vc_device(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	return container_of(vdev, struct virtio_ccw_device, vdev);
 }
 
+static inline void *__vc_dma_alloc(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size)
+{
+	return ccw_device_dma_zalloc(to_vc_device(vdev)->cdev, size);
+}
+
+static inline void __vc_dma_free(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size,
+				 void *cpu_addr)
+{
+	return ccw_device_dma_free(to_vc_device(vdev)->cdev, cpu_addr, size);
+}
+
+#define vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ptr) \
+	({ptr = __vc_dma_alloc(vdev, sizeof(*(ptr))); })
+#define vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ptr) \
+	__vc_dma_free(vdev, sizeof(*(ptr)), (ptr))
+
 static void drop_airq_indicator(struct virtqueue *vq, struct airq_info *info)
 {
 	unsigned long i, flags;
@@ -336,8 +356,7 @@  static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
 	struct airq_info *airq_info = vcdev->airq_info;
 
 	if (vcdev->is_thinint) {
-		thinint_area = kzalloc(sizeof(*thinint_area),
-				       GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+		vc_dma_alloc_struct(&vcdev->vdev, thinint_area);
 		if (!thinint_area)
 			return;
 		thinint_area->summary_indicator =
@@ -348,8 +367,8 @@  static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
 		ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long) thinint_area;
 	} else {
 		/* payload is the address of the indicators */
-		indicatorp = kmalloc(sizeof(indicators(vcdev)),
-				     GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+		indicatorp = __vc_dma_alloc(&vcdev->vdev,
+					   sizeof(indicators(vcdev)));
 		if (!indicatorp)
 			return;
 		*indicatorp = 0;
@@ -369,8 +388,9 @@  static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
 			 "Failed to deregister indicators (%d)\n", ret);
 	else if (vcdev->is_thinint)
 		virtio_ccw_drop_indicators(vcdev);
-	kfree(indicatorp);
-	kfree(thinint_area);
+	__vc_dma_free(&vcdev->vdev, sizeof(indicators(vcdev)),
+		      indicatorp);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(&vcdev->vdev, thinint_area);
 }
 
 static inline long __do_kvm_notify(struct subchannel_id schid,
@@ -417,15 +437,15 @@  static int virtio_ccw_read_vq_conf(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
 {
 	int ret;
 
-	vcdev->config_block->index = index;
+	vcdev->dma_area->config_block.index = index;
 	ccw->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_READ_VQ_CONF;
 	ccw->flags = 0;
 	ccw->count = sizeof(struct vq_config_block);
-	ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)(vcdev->config_block);
+	ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)(&vcdev->dma_area->config_block);
 	ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_READ_VQ_CONF);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	return vcdev->config_block->num ?: -ENOENT;
+	return vcdev->dma_area->config_block.num ?: -ENOENT;
 }
 
 static void virtio_ccw_del_vq(struct virtqueue *vq, struct ccw1 *ccw)
@@ -470,7 +490,7 @@  static void virtio_ccw_del_vq(struct virtqueue *vq, struct ccw1 *ccw)
 			 ret, index);
 
 	vring_del_virtqueue(vq);
-	kfree(info->info_block);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vq->vdev, info->info_block);
 	kfree(info);
 }
 
@@ -480,7 +500,7 @@  static void virtio_ccw_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	struct ccw1 *ccw;
 	struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev);
 
-	ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	if (!ccw)
 		return;
 
@@ -489,7 +509,7 @@  static void virtio_ccw_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(vq, n, &vdev->vqs, list)
 		virtio_ccw_del_vq(vq, ccw);
 
-	kfree(ccw);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ccw);
 }
 
 static struct virtqueue *virtio_ccw_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
@@ -512,8 +532,7 @@  static struct virtqueue *virtio_ccw_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_err;
 	}
-	info->info_block = kzalloc(sizeof(*info->info_block),
-				   GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, info->info_block);
 	if (!info->info_block) {
 		dev_warn(&vcdev->cdev->dev, "no info block\n");
 		err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -577,7 +596,7 @@  static struct virtqueue *virtio_ccw_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 	if (vq)
 		vring_del_virtqueue(vq);
 	if (info) {
-		kfree(info->info_block);
+		vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, info->info_block);
 	}
 	kfree(info);
 	return ERR_PTR(err);
@@ -591,7 +610,7 @@  static int virtio_ccw_register_adapter_ind(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
 	struct virtio_thinint_area *thinint_area = NULL;
 	struct airq_info *info;
 
-	thinint_area = kzalloc(sizeof(*thinint_area), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(&vcdev->vdev, thinint_area);
 	if (!thinint_area) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
@@ -627,7 +646,7 @@  static int virtio_ccw_register_adapter_ind(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
 		virtio_ccw_drop_indicators(vcdev);
 	}
 out:
-	kfree(thinint_area);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(&vcdev->vdev, thinint_area);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -643,7 +662,7 @@  static int virtio_ccw_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs,
 	int ret, i, queue_idx = 0;
 	struct ccw1 *ccw;
 
-	ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	if (!ccw)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -667,7 +686,7 @@  static int virtio_ccw_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs,
 	 * We need a data area under 2G to communicate. Our payload is
 	 * the address of the indicators.
 	*/
-	indicatorp = kmalloc(sizeof(indicators(vcdev)), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	indicatorp = __vc_dma_alloc(&vcdev->vdev, sizeof(indicators(vcdev)));
 	if (!indicatorp)
 		goto out;
 	*indicatorp = (unsigned long) indicators(vcdev);
@@ -699,12 +718,16 @@  static int virtio_ccw_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs,
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
 
-	kfree(indicatorp);
-	kfree(ccw);
+	if (indicatorp)
+		__vc_dma_free(&vcdev->vdev, sizeof(indicators(vcdev)),
+			       indicatorp);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	return 0;
 out:
-	kfree(indicatorp);
-	kfree(ccw);
+	if (indicatorp)
+		__vc_dma_free(&vcdev->vdev, sizeof(indicators(vcdev)),
+			       indicatorp);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	virtio_ccw_del_vqs(vdev);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -714,12 +737,12 @@  static void virtio_ccw_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev);
 	struct ccw1 *ccw;
 
-	ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	if (!ccw)
 		return;
 
 	/* Zero status bits. */
-	*vcdev->status = 0;
+	vcdev->dma_area->status = 0;
 
 	/* Send a reset ccw on device. */
 	ccw->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_VDEV_RESET;
@@ -727,22 +750,22 @@  static void virtio_ccw_reset(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	ccw->count = 0;
 	ccw->cda = 0;
 	ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_RESET);
-	kfree(ccw);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ccw);
 }
 
 static u64 virtio_ccw_get_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev);
 	struct virtio_feature_desc *features;
+	struct ccw1 *ccw;
 	int ret;
 	u64 rc;
-	struct ccw1 *ccw;
 
-	ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	if (!ccw)
 		return 0;
 
-	features = kzalloc(sizeof(*features), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, features);
 	if (!features) {
 		rc = 0;
 		goto out_free;
@@ -775,8 +798,8 @@  static u64 virtio_ccw_get_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 		rc |= (u64)le32_to_cpu(features->features) << 32;
 
 out_free:
-	kfree(features);
-	kfree(ccw);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, features);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	return rc;
 }
 
@@ -801,11 +824,11 @@  static int virtio_ccw_finalize_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	if (!ccw)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	features = kzalloc(sizeof(*features), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, features);
 	if (!features) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_free;
@@ -840,8 +863,8 @@  static int virtio_ccw_finalize_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_FEAT);
 
 out_free:
-	kfree(features);
-	kfree(ccw);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, features);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ccw);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -855,11 +878,11 @@  static void virtio_ccw_get_config(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 	void *config_area;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	if (!ccw)
 		return;
 
-	config_area = kzalloc(VIRTIO_CCW_CONFIG_SIZE, GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	config_area = __vc_dma_alloc(vdev, VIRTIO_CCW_CONFIG_SIZE);
 	if (!config_area)
 		goto out_free;
 
@@ -881,8 +904,8 @@  static void virtio_ccw_get_config(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 		memcpy(buf, config_area + offset, len);
 
 out_free:
-	kfree(config_area);
-	kfree(ccw);
+	__vc_dma_free(vdev, VIRTIO_CCW_CONFIG_SIZE, config_area);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ccw);
 }
 
 static void virtio_ccw_set_config(struct virtio_device *vdev,
@@ -894,11 +917,11 @@  static void virtio_ccw_set_config(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 	void *config_area;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	if (!ccw)
 		return;
 
-	config_area = kzalloc(VIRTIO_CCW_CONFIG_SIZE, GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	config_area = __vc_dma_alloc(vdev, VIRTIO_CCW_CONFIG_SIZE);
 	if (!config_area)
 		goto out_free;
 
@@ -917,61 +940,61 @@  static void virtio_ccw_set_config(struct virtio_device *vdev,
 	ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_CONFIG);
 
 out_free:
-	kfree(config_area);
-	kfree(ccw);
+	__vc_dma_free(vdev, VIRTIO_CCW_CONFIG_SIZE, config_area);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ccw);
 }
 
 static u8 virtio_ccw_get_status(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 {
 	struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev);
-	u8 old_status = *vcdev->status;
+	u8 old_status = vcdev->dma_area->status;
 	struct ccw1 *ccw;
 
 	if (vcdev->revision < 1)
-		return *vcdev->status;
+		return vcdev->dma_area->status;
 
-	ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	if (!ccw)
 		return old_status;
 
 	ccw->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_READ_STATUS;
 	ccw->flags = 0;
-	ccw->count = sizeof(*vcdev->status);
-	ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)vcdev->status;
+	ccw->count = sizeof(vcdev->dma_area->status);
+	ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status;
 	ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_READ_STATUS);
 /*
  * If the channel program failed (should only happen if the device
  * was hotunplugged, and then we clean up via the machine check
- * handler anyway), vcdev->status was not overwritten and we just
+ * handler anyway), vcdev->dma_area->status was not overwritten and we just
  * return the old status, which is fine.
 */
-	kfree(ccw);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ccw);
 
-	return *vcdev->status;
+	return vcdev->dma_area->status;
 }
 
 static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
 {
 	struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(vdev);
-	u8 old_status = *vcdev->status;
+	u8 old_status = vcdev->dma_area->status;
 	struct ccw1 *ccw;
 	int ret;
 
-	ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(vdev, ccw);
 	if (!ccw)
 		return;
 
 	/* Write the status to the host. */
-	*vcdev->status = status;
+	vcdev->dma_area->status = status;
 	ccw->cmd_code = CCW_CMD_WRITE_STATUS;
 	ccw->flags = 0;
 	ccw->count = sizeof(status);
-	ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)vcdev->status;
+	ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status;
 	ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
 	/* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */
 	if (ret)
-		*vcdev->status = old_status;
-	kfree(ccw);
+		vcdev->dma_area->status = old_status;
+	vc_dma_free_struct(vdev, ccw);
 }
 
 static const char *virtio_ccw_bus_name(struct virtio_device *vdev)
@@ -1004,8 +1027,7 @@  static void virtio_ccw_release_dev(struct device *_d)
 	struct virtio_device *dev = dev_to_virtio(_d);
 	struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev = to_vc_device(dev);
 
-	kfree(vcdev->status);
-	kfree(vcdev->config_block);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(&vcdev->vdev, vcdev->dma_area);
 	kfree(vcdev);
 }
 
@@ -1213,12 +1235,12 @@  static int virtio_ccw_set_transport_rev(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
 	struct ccw1 *ccw;
 	int ret;
 
-	ccw = kzalloc(sizeof(*ccw), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(&vcdev->vdev, ccw);
 	if (!ccw)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-	rev = kzalloc(sizeof(*rev), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(&vcdev->vdev, rev);
 	if (!rev) {
-		kfree(ccw);
+		vc_dma_free_struct(&vcdev->vdev, ccw);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
@@ -1248,8 +1270,8 @@  static int virtio_ccw_set_transport_rev(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev)
 		}
 	} while (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP);
 
-	kfree(ccw);
-	kfree(rev);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(&vcdev->vdev, ccw);
+	vc_dma_free_struct(&vcdev->vdev, rev);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -1266,14 +1288,9 @@  static int virtio_ccw_online(struct ccw_device *cdev)
 		goto out_free;
 	}
 	vcdev->vdev.dev.parent = &cdev->dev;
-	vcdev->config_block = kzalloc(sizeof(*vcdev->config_block),
-				   GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!vcdev->config_block) {
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out_free;
-	}
-	vcdev->status = kzalloc(sizeof(*vcdev->status), GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!vcdev->status) {
+	vcdev->cdev = cdev;
+	vc_dma_alloc_struct(&vcdev->vdev, vcdev->dma_area);
+	if (!vcdev->dma_area) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_free;
 	}
@@ -1282,7 +1299,6 @@  static int virtio_ccw_online(struct ccw_device *cdev)
 
 	vcdev->vdev.dev.release = virtio_ccw_release_dev;
 	vcdev->vdev.config = &virtio_ccw_config_ops;
-	vcdev->cdev = cdev;
 	init_waitqueue_head(&vcdev->wait_q);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vcdev->virtqueues);
 	spin_lock_init(&vcdev->lock);
@@ -1313,8 +1329,7 @@  static int virtio_ccw_online(struct ccw_device *cdev)
 	return ret;
 out_free:
 	if (vcdev) {
-		kfree(vcdev->status);
-		kfree(vcdev->config_block);
+		vc_dma_free_struct(&vcdev->vdev, vcdev->dma_area);
 	}
 	kfree(vcdev);
 	return ret;