Message ID | 20190530152758.16628-1-sashal@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE | expand |
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:27:56AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > Changes since v3: > > - Address comments by Jarkko Sakkinen > - Address comments by Igor Opaniuk > > Sasha Levin (2): > fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE > fTPM: add documentation for ftpm driver I think patches start to look proper but I wonder can anyone test these? I don't think before that I can merge these. /Jarkko
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 11:28:15PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:27:56AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: >> Changes since v3: >> >> - Address comments by Jarkko Sakkinen >> - Address comments by Igor Opaniuk >> >> Sasha Levin (2): >> fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE >> fTPM: add documentation for ftpm driver > >I think patches start to look proper but I wonder can anyone test >these? I don't think before that I can merge these. They're all functionally tested by us on actual hardware before being sent out. The reference implementation is open and being kept updated, and an interested third party should be able to verify the correctness of these patches. However, it doesn't look like there's an interested third party given that these patches have been out for a few months now. -- Thanks, Sasha
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 05:16:48PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 11:28:15PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:27:56AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > Changes since v3: > > > > > > - Address comments by Jarkko Sakkinen > > > - Address comments by Igor Opaniuk > > > > > > Sasha Levin (2): > > > fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE > > > fTPM: add documentation for ftpm driver > > > > I think patches start to look proper but I wonder can anyone test > > these? I don't think before that I can merge these. > > They're all functionally tested by us on actual hardware before being > sent out. > > The reference implementation is open and being kept updated, and an > interested third party should be able to verify the correctness of these > patches. However, it doesn't look like there's an interested third party > given that these patches have been out for a few months now. So can they be tagged with your tested-by? /Jarkko