diff mbox series

[v2,hmm,10/11] mm/hmm: Do not use list*_rcu() for hmm->ranges

Message ID 20190606184438.31646-11-jgg@ziepe.ca (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Various revisions from a locking/code review | expand

Commit Message

Jason Gunthorpe June 6, 2019, 6:44 p.m. UTC 
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

This list is always read and written while holding hmm->lock so there is
no need for the confusing _rcu annotations.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
---
 mm/hmm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

John Hubbard June 7, 2019, 3:40 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 6/6/19 11:44 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> 
> This list is always read and written while holding hmm->lock so there is
> no need for the confusing _rcu annotations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> ---
>  mm/hmm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index c2fecb3ecb11e1..709d138dd49027 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
>  	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
>  
>  	range->hmm = hmm;
> -	list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
> +	list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for
> @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
>  		return;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
> -	list_del_rcu(&range->list);
> +	list_del(&range->list);
>  	mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
>  
>  	/* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */
> 

Good point. I'd overlooked this many times.

    Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>


thanks,
Ralph Campbell June 7, 2019, 8:49 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 6/6/19 11:44 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> 
> This list is always read and written while holding hmm->lock so there is
> no need for the confusing _rcu annotations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>

> ---
>   mm/hmm.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index c2fecb3ecb11e1..709d138dd49027 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
>   	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
>   
>   	range->hmm = hmm;
> -	list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
> +	list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for
> @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
>   		return;
>   
>   	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
> -	list_del_rcu(&range->list);
> +	list_del(&range->list);
>   	mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
>   
>   	/* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */
>
Souptick Joarder June 7, 2019, 10:11 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:15 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> wrote:
>
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
>
> This list is always read and written while holding hmm->lock so there is
> no need for the confusing _rcu annotations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@gmail.com>

> ---
>  mm/hmm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index c2fecb3ecb11e1..709d138dd49027 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
>         mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
>
>         range->hmm = hmm;
> -       list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
> +       list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
>
>         /*
>          * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for
> @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
>                 return;
>
>         mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
> -       list_del_rcu(&range->list);
> +       list_del(&range->list);
>         mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
>
>         /* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */
> --
> 2.21.0
>
Ira Weiny June 7, 2019, 11:02 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 03:44:37PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> 
> This list is always read and written while holding hmm->lock so there is
> no need for the confusing _rcu annotations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <iweiny@intel.com>

> ---
>  mm/hmm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
> index c2fecb3ecb11e1..709d138dd49027 100644
> --- a/mm/hmm.c
> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
> @@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
>  	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
>  
>  	range->hmm = hmm;
> -	list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
> +	list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for
> @@ -941,7 +941,7 @@ void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
>  		return;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
> -	list_del_rcu(&range->list);
> +	list_del(&range->list);
>  	mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
>  
>  	/* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */
> -- 
> 2.21.0
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index c2fecb3ecb11e1..709d138dd49027 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -911,7 +911,7 @@  int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
 	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
 
 	range->hmm = hmm;
-	list_add_rcu(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
+	list_add(&range->list, &hmm->ranges);
 
 	/*
 	 * If there are any concurrent notifiers we have to wait for them for
@@ -941,7 +941,7 @@  void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
 		return;
 
 	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
-	list_del_rcu(&range->list);
+	list_del(&range->list);
 	mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
 
 	/* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */