Message ID | 20190608180626.30589-5-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | pwm-meson: cleanups and improvements | expand |
Hello, [added clk-people to recipients] On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 08:06:16PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > MISC_CLK_SEL_WIDTH is only used in one place where it's converted into > a bit-mask. Rename and change the macro to be a bit-mask so that > conversion is not needed anymore. No functional changes intended. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> > Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c > index c62a3ac924d0..84b28ba0f903 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ > #define MISC_A_CLK_DIV_SHIFT 8 > #define MISC_B_CLK_SEL_SHIFT 6 > #define MISC_A_CLK_SEL_SHIFT 4 > -#define MISC_CLK_SEL_WIDTH 2 > +#define MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK 0x3 > #define MISC_B_EN BIT(1) > #define MISC_A_EN BIT(0) > > @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int meson_pwm_init_channels(struct meson_pwm *meson, > > channel->mux.reg = meson->base + REG_MISC_AB; > channel->mux.shift = mux_reg_shifts[i]; > - channel->mux.mask = BIT(MISC_CLK_SEL_WIDTH) - 1; > + channel->mux.mask = MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK; > channel->mux.flags = 0; > channel->mux.lock = &meson->lock; > channel->mux.table = NULL; IMHO clk_mux is ugly here. It could easily just take .mask = 3 << mux_reg_shifts[i], as input parameter instead of .mask = 3, .shift = mux_reg_shifts[i], . Then the usage would be (IMHO) a bit more natural, the clock mask could then be defined as: #define MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK(i) GENMASK(5 + 2 * (i), 4 + 2 * (i)) and this value could just be passed to the clk_mux. (OK, this could be done already now, and then we'd do channel->mux.shift = ffs(MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK(i)) - 1; channel->mux.mask = MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK(i) >> channel->mux.shift; .) Apart from that, I wonder if the pwm-meson driver should better use clk_register_mux instead of open coding it. (Though there doesn't seem to exists a devm_ variant of it.) Best regards Uwe
Hi Uwe, On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 6:33 PM Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: [...] > > @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int meson_pwm_init_channels(struct meson_pwm *meson, > > > > channel->mux.reg = meson->base + REG_MISC_AB; > > channel->mux.shift = mux_reg_shifts[i]; > > - channel->mux.mask = BIT(MISC_CLK_SEL_WIDTH) - 1; > > + channel->mux.mask = MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK; > > channel->mux.flags = 0; > > channel->mux.lock = &meson->lock; > > channel->mux.table = NULL; > > IMHO clk_mux is ugly here. It could easily just take > > .mask = 3 << mux_reg_shifts[i], in most cases that would be even nicer to read because it could be expressed as: .mask = GENMASK(5, 4) so I like your idea in general though I think it should not block this patch [...] > Apart from that, I wonder if the pwm-meson driver should better use > clk_register_mux instead of open coding it. (Though there doesn't seem > to exists a devm_ variant of it.) I tried to use clk_register_mux in the past. it works but it's not as nice to read as the open-coded variant because it takes 10 parameters. I find it easier to read 13 separate lines compared to reading a function call with 10 parameters Martin
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c index c62a3ac924d0..84b28ba0f903 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ #define MISC_A_CLK_DIV_SHIFT 8 #define MISC_B_CLK_SEL_SHIFT 6 #define MISC_A_CLK_SEL_SHIFT 4 -#define MISC_CLK_SEL_WIDTH 2 +#define MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK 0x3 #define MISC_B_EN BIT(1) #define MISC_A_EN BIT(0) @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int meson_pwm_init_channels(struct meson_pwm *meson, channel->mux.reg = meson->base + REG_MISC_AB; channel->mux.shift = mux_reg_shifts[i]; - channel->mux.mask = BIT(MISC_CLK_SEL_WIDTH) - 1; + channel->mux.mask = MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK; channel->mux.flags = 0; channel->mux.lock = &meson->lock; channel->mux.table = NULL;