| Message ID | 20190613161414.29161-5-pvorel@suse.cz (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | LTP reproducer on broken IMA on overlayfs | expand |
Am 13.06.19 um 18:14 Uhr schrieb Petr Vorel: > test demonstrate a bug on overlayfs on current mainline kernel when > combining IMA with EVM. > > Based on reproducer made by Ignaz Forster <iforster@suse.de> > used for not upstreamed patchset [1] and previous report [2]. > IMA only behavior has already been fixed [3]. > > NOTE: backup variables are needed because ima_setup.sh calling > tst_mount as well when TMPDIR is on tmpfs device. > > Documentation is based on Ignaz Forster instructions for openSUSE [4]. > > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/msg05926.html > [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/msg03593.html > [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10776231/ > [4] http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2019-May/011956.html > > Tested-by: Ignaz Forster <iforster@suse.de> > Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> > --- > runtest/ima | 1 + > .../security/integrity/ima/tests/README.md | 83 +++++++++++++++++ > .../integrity/ima/tests/evm_overlay.sh | 93 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh | 4 +- > 4 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/README.md > create mode 100755 testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/evm_overlay.sh > > diff --git a/runtest/ima b/runtest/ima > index bcae16bb7..f3ea88cf0 100644 > --- a/runtest/ima > +++ b/runtest/ima > @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ ima_measurements ima_measurements.sh > ima_policy ima_policy.sh > ima_tpm ima_tpm.sh > ima_violations ima_violations.sh > +evm_overlay evm_overlay.sh > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/README.md b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/README.md > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..961b68a38 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/README.md > @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ > +IMA + EVM testing > +================= > + > +IMA tests > +--------- > + > +`ima_measurements.sh` require builtin IMA tcb policy to be loaded > +(`ima_policy=tcb` or `ima_policy=appraise_tcb` kernel parameter). This test requires "appraise_tcb" ("tcb" is not enough), as the errors only occur during appraisal. > +Although custom policy which contains which may contain the equivalent > +measurement tcb rules can be loaded via dracut, systemd or later manually > +from user space, detecting it would require `IMA_READ_POLICY=y` therefore > +ignore this option. I guess this should be "Although a custom policy, loaded via dracut, systemd or manually from user space, may contain equivalent measurement tcb rules, detecting them would [...]" > +Mandatory kernel configuration for IMA: > +``` > +CONFIG_INTEGRITY=y > +CONFIG_IMA=y > +``` > + > +EVM tests > +--------- > + > +`evm_overlay.sh` requires to builtin IMA appraise tcb policy (e.g. `ima_policy=appraise_tcb` ^^ a > +kernel parameter) which appraises the integrity of all files owned by root and EVM setup. > +Again, for simplicity ignore possibility to load reuired rules via custom policy. ^q > +Mandatory kernel configuration for IMA & EVM: > +``` > +CONFIG_INTEGRITY=y > +CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE=y > +CONFIG_IMA=y > +CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE=y > +CONFIG_EVM=y > +CONFIG_KEYS=y > +CONFIG_TRUSTED_KEYS=y > +CONFIG_ENCRYPTED_KEYS=y > +``` > + > +Example of installing IMA + EVM on openSUSE: > + > +* Boot install system with `ima_policy=appraise_tcb ima_appraise=fix evm=fix` kernel parameters I was missing the measurement option. ima_policy should have been ima_policy='tcb|appraise_tcb' for the statement below to be true. > + (for IMA measurement, IMA appraisal and EVM protection) > +* Proceed with installation until summary screen, but do not start the installation yet > +* Select package `dracut-ima` (required for early boot EVM support) for installation > + (Debian based distros already contain IMA + EVM support in `dracut` package) > +* Change to a console window and run commands to generate keys required by EVM: > +``` > +# mkdir /etc/keys > +# user_key=$(keyctl add user kmk-user "`dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1 count=32 2>/dev/null`" @u) > +# keyctl pipe "$user_key" > /etc/keys/kmk-user.blob > +# evm_key=$(keyctl add encrypted evm-key "new user:kmk-user 64" @u) > +# keyctl pipe "$evm_key" >/etc/keys/evm.blob > +# cat <<END >/etc/sysconfig/masterkey > +MASTERKEYTYPE="user" > +MASTERKEY="/etc/keys/kmk-user.blob" > +END > +# cat <<END >/etc/sysconfig/evm > +EVMKEY="/etc/keys/evm.blob" > +END > +# mount -t securityfs security /sys/kernel/security > +# echo 1 >/sys/kernel/security/evm > +``` > + > +* Go back to the installation summary screen and start the installation > +* During the installation execute the following commands from the console: > +``` > +# cp -r /etc/keys /mnt/etc/ # Debian based distributions: use /target instead of /mnt > +# cp /etc/sysconfig/{evm,masterkey} /mnt/etc/sysconfig/ > +``` > + > +This should work on any distribution using dracut. > +Loading EVM keys is also possible with initramfs-tools (Debian based distributions). > + > +Of course it's possible to install OS usual way, add keys later and fix missing xattrs with: > +``` > +evmctl -r ima_fix / > +``` > + > +or with `find` if evmctl not available: ^ is > +``` > +find / \( -fstype rootfs -o -fstype ext4 -o -fstype btrfs -o -fstype xfs \) -exec sh -c "< '{}'" \; > +``` > +Again, fixing requires `ima_policy=appraise_tcb ima_appraise=fix evm=fix` kernel parameters. Maybe also add the tcb option for measurement here. Ignaz > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/evm_overlay.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/evm_overlay.sh > new file mode 100755 > index 000000000..024b03917 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/evm_overlay.sh > @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ > +#!/bin/sh > +# Copyright (c) 2019 Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> > +# Based on reproducer and further discussion with Ignaz Forster <iforster@suse.de> > +# Reproducer for not upstreamed patchset [1] and previous report [2]. > +# [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/msg05926.html > +# [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/msg03593.html > + > +TST_SETUP="setup" > +TST_CLEANUP="cleanup" > +TST_NEEDS_DEVICE=1 > +TST_CNT=4 > +. ima_setup.sh > + > +setup() > +{ > + EVM_FILE="/sys/kernel/security/evm" > + > + [ -f "$EVM_FILE" ] || tst_brk TCONF "EVM not enabled in kernel" > + [ $(cat $EVM_FILE) -eq 1 ] || tst_brk TCONF "EVM not enabled for this boot" > + > + check_ima_policy "appraise_tcb" > + > + lower="$TST_MNTPOINT/lower" > + upper="$TST_MNTPOINT/upper" > + work="$TST_MNTPOINT/work" > + merged="$TST_MNTPOINT/merged" > + mkdir -p $lower $upper $work $merged > + > + device_backup="$TST_DEVICE" > + TST_DEVICE="overlay" > + > + fs_type_backup="$TST_FS_TYPE" > + TST_FS_TYPE="overlay" > + > + mntpoint_backup="$TST_MNTPOINT" > + TST_MNTPOINT="$merged" > + > + params_backup="$TST_MNT_PARAMS" > + TST_MNT_PARAMS="-o lowerdir=$lower,upperdir=$upper,workdir=$work" > + > + tst_mount > + mounted=1 > +} > + > +test1() > +{ > + local file="foo1.txt" > + > + tst_res TINFO "overwrite file in overlay" > + EXPECT_PASS echo lower \> $lower/$file > + EXPECT_PASS echo overlay \> $merged/$file > +} > + > +test2() > +{ > + local file="foo2.txt" > + > + tst_res TINFO "append file in overlay" > + EXPECT_PASS echo lower \> $lower/$file > + EXPECT_PASS echo overlay \>\> $merged/$file > +} > + > +test3() > +{ > + local file="foo3.txt" > + > + tst_res TINFO "create a new file in overlay" > + EXPECT_PASS echo overlay \> $merged/$file > +} > + > +test4() > +{ > + local f > + > + tst_res TINFO "read all created files" > + for f in $(find $TST_MNTPOINT -type f); do > + EXPECT_PASS cat $f \> /dev/null 2\> /dev/null > + done > +} > + > +cleanup() > +{ > + [ -n "$mounted" ] || return 0 > + > + tst_umount $TST_DEVICE > + > + TST_DEVICE="$device_backup" > + TST_FS_TYPE="$fs_type_backup" > + TST_MNTPOINT="$mntpoint_backup" > + TST_MNT_PARAMS="$params_backup" > +} > + > +tst_run > diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh > index 606034fec..529b77529 100644 > --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh > +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh > @@ -66,14 +66,14 @@ print_ima_config() > local config="/boot/config-$(uname -r)" > local i > > - tst_res TINFO "/proc/cmdline: $(cat /proc/cmdline)" > - > if [ -r "$config" ]; then > tst_res TINFO "IMA kernel config:" > for i in $(grep ^CONFIG_IMA $config); do > tst_res TINFO "$i" > done > fi > + > + tst_res TINFO "/proc/cmdline: $(cat /proc/cmdline)" > } > > ima_setup() >
Hi Ignaz, thanks for pointing out all the typos and wrong grep (previous patch). Going to sent v5 with fixes. Just one question below. ... > > +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/README.md > > @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ > > +IMA + EVM testing > > +================= > > + > > +IMA tests > > +--------- > > + > > +`ima_measurements.sh` require builtin IMA tcb policy to be loaded > > +(`ima_policy=tcb` or `ima_policy=appraise_tcb` kernel parameter). > This test requires "appraise_tcb" ("tcb" is not enough), as the errors only > occur during appraisal. Are you sure? This is a note for ima_measurements.sh test (not for evm_overlay.sh). I require ima_policy=tcb here, according to Mimi [1] Kind regards, Petr [1] http://lists.linux.it/pipermail/ltp/2019-June/012363.html
Am 14.06.19 um 16:14 Uhr schrieb Petr Vorel: >>> +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/README.md >>> @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ >>> +IMA + EVM testing >>> +================= >>> + >>> +IMA tests >>> +--------- >>> + >>> +`ima_measurements.sh` require builtin IMA tcb policy to be loaded >>> +(`ima_policy=tcb` or `ima_policy=appraise_tcb` kernel parameter). > >> This test requires "appraise_tcb" ("tcb" is not enough), as the errors only >> occur during appraisal. > Are you sure? This is a note for ima_measurements.sh test (not for evm_overlay.sh). > I require ima_policy=tcb here, according to Mimi [1] Oh, sorry, you are correct - "tcb" is correct in this case. I got confused as the documentation is included in the overlayfs reproducer patch. Ignaz
Hi Ignaz, > > > This test requires "appraise_tcb" ("tcb" is not enough), as the errors only > > > occur during appraisal. > > Are you sure? This is a note for ima_measurements.sh test (not for evm_overlay.sh). > > I require ima_policy=tcb here, according to Mimi [1] > Oh, sorry, you are correct - "tcb" is correct in this case. I got confused > as the documentation is included in the overlayfs reproducer patch. Maybe I should put it into separate commit. > Ignaz Kind regards, Petr
Hi Mimi, Ignaz, > > > > This test requires "appraise_tcb" ("tcb" is not enough), as the errors only > > > > occur during appraisal. > > > Are you sure? This is a note for ima_measurements.sh test (not for evm_overlay.sh). > > > I require ima_policy=tcb here, according to Mimi [1] > > Oh, sorry, you are correct - "tcb" is correct in this case. I got confused > > as the documentation is included in the overlayfs reproducer patch. > Maybe I should put it into separate commit. Whole patchset merged. Thanks a lot both for your help! Kind regards, Petr
diff --git a/runtest/ima b/runtest/ima index bcae16bb7..f3ea88cf0 100644 --- a/runtest/ima +++ b/runtest/ima @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ ima_measurements ima_measurements.sh ima_policy ima_policy.sh ima_tpm ima_tpm.sh ima_violations ima_violations.sh +evm_overlay evm_overlay.sh diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/README.md b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/README.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..961b68a38 --- /dev/null +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +IMA + EVM testing +================= + +IMA tests +--------- + +`ima_measurements.sh` require builtin IMA tcb policy to be loaded +(`ima_policy=tcb` or `ima_policy=appraise_tcb` kernel parameter). +Although custom policy which contains which may contain the equivalent +measurement tcb rules can be loaded via dracut, systemd or later manually +from user space, detecting it would require `IMA_READ_POLICY=y` therefore +ignore this option. + +Mandatory kernel configuration for IMA: +``` +CONFIG_INTEGRITY=y +CONFIG_IMA=y +``` + +EVM tests +--------- + +`evm_overlay.sh` requires to builtin IMA appraise tcb policy (e.g. `ima_policy=appraise_tcb` +kernel parameter) which appraises the integrity of all files owned by root and EVM setup. +Again, for simplicity ignore possibility to load reuired rules via custom policy. + +Mandatory kernel configuration for IMA & EVM: +``` +CONFIG_INTEGRITY=y +CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE=y +CONFIG_IMA=y +CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE=y +CONFIG_EVM=y +CONFIG_KEYS=y +CONFIG_TRUSTED_KEYS=y +CONFIG_ENCRYPTED_KEYS=y +``` + +Example of installing IMA + EVM on openSUSE: + +* Boot install system with `ima_policy=appraise_tcb ima_appraise=fix evm=fix` kernel parameters + (for IMA measurement, IMA appraisal and EVM protection) +* Proceed with installation until summary screen, but do not start the installation yet +* Select package `dracut-ima` (required for early boot EVM support) for installation + (Debian based distros already contain IMA + EVM support in `dracut` package) +* Change to a console window and run commands to generate keys required by EVM: +``` +# mkdir /etc/keys +# user_key=$(keyctl add user kmk-user "`dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1 count=32 2>/dev/null`" @u) +# keyctl pipe "$user_key" > /etc/keys/kmk-user.blob +# evm_key=$(keyctl add encrypted evm-key "new user:kmk-user 64" @u) +# keyctl pipe "$evm_key" >/etc/keys/evm.blob +# cat <<END >/etc/sysconfig/masterkey +MASTERKEYTYPE="user" +MASTERKEY="/etc/keys/kmk-user.blob" +END +# cat <<END >/etc/sysconfig/evm +EVMKEY="/etc/keys/evm.blob" +END +# mount -t securityfs security /sys/kernel/security +# echo 1 >/sys/kernel/security/evm +``` + +* Go back to the installation summary screen and start the installation +* During the installation execute the following commands from the console: +``` +# cp -r /etc/keys /mnt/etc/ # Debian based distributions: use /target instead of /mnt +# cp /etc/sysconfig/{evm,masterkey} /mnt/etc/sysconfig/ +``` + +This should work on any distribution using dracut. +Loading EVM keys is also possible with initramfs-tools (Debian based distributions). + +Of course it's possible to install OS usual way, add keys later and fix missing xattrs with: +``` +evmctl -r ima_fix / +``` + +or with `find` if evmctl not available: +``` +find / \( -fstype rootfs -o -fstype ext4 -o -fstype btrfs -o -fstype xfs \) -exec sh -c "< '{}'" \; +``` +Again, fixing requires `ima_policy=appraise_tcb ima_appraise=fix evm=fix` kernel parameters. diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/evm_overlay.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/evm_overlay.sh new file mode 100755 index 000000000..024b03917 --- /dev/null +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/evm_overlay.sh @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +#!/bin/sh +# Copyright (c) 2019 Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> +# Based on reproducer and further discussion with Ignaz Forster <iforster@suse.de> +# Reproducer for not upstreamed patchset [1] and previous report [2]. +# [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/msg05926.html +# [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-integrity/msg03593.html + +TST_SETUP="setup" +TST_CLEANUP="cleanup" +TST_NEEDS_DEVICE=1 +TST_CNT=4 +. ima_setup.sh + +setup() +{ + EVM_FILE="/sys/kernel/security/evm" + + [ -f "$EVM_FILE" ] || tst_brk TCONF "EVM not enabled in kernel" + [ $(cat $EVM_FILE) -eq 1 ] || tst_brk TCONF "EVM not enabled for this boot" + + check_ima_policy "appraise_tcb" + + lower="$TST_MNTPOINT/lower" + upper="$TST_MNTPOINT/upper" + work="$TST_MNTPOINT/work" + merged="$TST_MNTPOINT/merged" + mkdir -p $lower $upper $work $merged + + device_backup="$TST_DEVICE" + TST_DEVICE="overlay" + + fs_type_backup="$TST_FS_TYPE" + TST_FS_TYPE="overlay" + + mntpoint_backup="$TST_MNTPOINT" + TST_MNTPOINT="$merged" + + params_backup="$TST_MNT_PARAMS" + TST_MNT_PARAMS="-o lowerdir=$lower,upperdir=$upper,workdir=$work" + + tst_mount + mounted=1 +} + +test1() +{ + local file="foo1.txt" + + tst_res TINFO "overwrite file in overlay" + EXPECT_PASS echo lower \> $lower/$file + EXPECT_PASS echo overlay \> $merged/$file +} + +test2() +{ + local file="foo2.txt" + + tst_res TINFO "append file in overlay" + EXPECT_PASS echo lower \> $lower/$file + EXPECT_PASS echo overlay \>\> $merged/$file +} + +test3() +{ + local file="foo3.txt" + + tst_res TINFO "create a new file in overlay" + EXPECT_PASS echo overlay \> $merged/$file +} + +test4() +{ + local f + + tst_res TINFO "read all created files" + for f in $(find $TST_MNTPOINT -type f); do + EXPECT_PASS cat $f \> /dev/null 2\> /dev/null + done +} + +cleanup() +{ + [ -n "$mounted" ] || return 0 + + tst_umount $TST_DEVICE + + TST_DEVICE="$device_backup" + TST_FS_TYPE="$fs_type_backup" + TST_MNTPOINT="$mntpoint_backup" + TST_MNT_PARAMS="$params_backup" +} + +tst_run diff --git a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh index 606034fec..529b77529 100644 --- a/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh +++ b/testcases/kernel/security/integrity/ima/tests/ima_setup.sh @@ -66,14 +66,14 @@ print_ima_config() local config="/boot/config-$(uname -r)" local i - tst_res TINFO "/proc/cmdline: $(cat /proc/cmdline)" - if [ -r "$config" ]; then tst_res TINFO "IMA kernel config:" for i in $(grep ^CONFIG_IMA $config); do tst_res TINFO "$i" done fi + + tst_res TINFO "/proc/cmdline: $(cat /proc/cmdline)" } ima_setup()