Message ID | 20190617131918.2518727-1-arnd@arndb.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Headers | show |
Series | dmaengine: dw-edma: fix __iomem type confusion | expand |
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 14:18:43, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > The new driver mixes up dma_addr_t and __iomem pointers, which results > in warnings on some 32-bit architectures, like: > > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c: In function '__dw_regs': > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c:28:9: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast] > return (struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *)dw->rg_region.vaddr; > > Make it use __iomem pointers consistently here, and avoid using dma_addr_t > for __iomem tokens altogether. > > A small complication here is the debugfs code, which passes an __iomem > token as the private data for debugfs files, requiring the use of > extra __force. > > Fixes: 7e4b8a4fbe2c ("dmaengine: Add Synopsys eDMA IP version 0 support") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > --- > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h | 2 +- > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 18 ++++++++-------- > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 10 ++++----- > drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c | 27 ++++++++++++------------ > 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h > index b6cc90cbc9dc..d03a6ad263bd 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h > @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct dw_edma_burst { > > struct dw_edma_region { > phys_addr_t paddr; > - dma_addr_t vaddr; > + void __iomem * vaddr; > size_t sz; > }; > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c > index 4c96e1c948f2..dc85f55e1bb8 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c > @@ -130,19 +130,19 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, > chip->id = pdev->devfn; > chip->irq = pdev->irq; > > - dw->rg_region.vaddr = (dma_addr_t)pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->rg_bar]; > + dw->rg_region.vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->rg_bar]; > dw->rg_region.vaddr += pdata->rg_off; > dw->rg_region.paddr = pdev->resource[pdata->rg_bar].start; > dw->rg_region.paddr += pdata->rg_off; > dw->rg_region.sz = pdata->rg_sz; > > - dw->ll_region.vaddr = (dma_addr_t)pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->ll_bar]; > + dw->ll_region.vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->ll_bar]; > dw->ll_region.vaddr += pdata->ll_off; > dw->ll_region.paddr = pdev->resource[pdata->ll_bar].start; > dw->ll_region.paddr += pdata->ll_off; > dw->ll_region.sz = pdata->ll_sz; > > - dw->dt_region.vaddr = (dma_addr_t)pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->dt_bar]; > + dw->dt_region.vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->dt_bar]; > dw->dt_region.vaddr += pdata->dt_off; > dw->dt_region.paddr = pdev->resource[pdata->dt_bar].start; > dw->dt_region.paddr += pdata->dt_off; > @@ -158,17 +158,17 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, > pci_dbg(pdev, "Mode:\t%s\n", > dw->mode == EDMA_MODE_LEGACY ? "Legacy" : "Unroll"); > > - pci_dbg(pdev, "Registers:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%pa, p=%pa)\n", > + pci_dbg(pdev, "Registers:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%p, p=%pa)\n", > pdata->rg_bar, pdata->rg_off, pdata->rg_sz, > - &dw->rg_region.vaddr, &dw->rg_region.paddr); > + dw->rg_region.vaddr, &dw->rg_region.paddr); > > - pci_dbg(pdev, "L. List:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%pa, p=%pa)\n", > + pci_dbg(pdev, "L. List:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%p, p=%pa)\n", > pdata->ll_bar, pdata->ll_off, pdata->ll_sz, > - &dw->ll_region.vaddr, &dw->ll_region.paddr); > + dw->ll_region.vaddr, &dw->ll_region.paddr); > > - pci_dbg(pdev, "Data:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%pa, p=%pa)\n", > + pci_dbg(pdev, "Data:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%p, p=%pa)\n", > pdata->dt_bar, pdata->dt_off, pdata->dt_sz, > - &dw->dt_region.vaddr, &dw->dt_region.paddr); > + dw->dt_region.vaddr, &dw->dt_region.paddr); > > pci_dbg(pdev, "Nr. IRQs:\t%u\n", dw->nr_irqs); > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > index 8cafd51ff9ec..d670ebcc37b3 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ enum dw_edma_control { > > static inline struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *__dw_regs(struct dw_edma *dw) > { > - return (struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *)dw->rg_region.vaddr; > + return dw->rg_region.vaddr; > } > > #define SET(dw, name, value) \ > @@ -192,13 +192,13 @@ u32 dw_edma_v0_core_status_abort_int(struct dw_edma *dw, enum dw_edma_dir dir) > static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk) > { > struct dw_edma_burst *child; > - struct dw_edma_v0_lli *lli; > - struct dw_edma_v0_llp *llp; > + struct dw_edma_v0_lli __iomem *lli; > + struct dw_edma_v0_llp __iomem *llp; > u32 control = 0, i = 0; > uintptr_t sar, dar, addr; > int j; > > - lli = (struct dw_edma_v0_lli *)chunk->ll_region.vaddr; > + lli = chunk->ll_region.vaddr; > > if (chunk->cb) > control = DW_EDMA_V0_CB; > @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk) > i++; > } > > - llp = (struct dw_edma_v0_llp *)&lli[i]; > + llp = (void __iomem *)&lli[i]; > control = DW_EDMA_V0_LLP | DW_EDMA_V0_TCB; > if (!chunk->cb) > control |= DW_EDMA_V0_CB; > diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c > index 5728b6fe938c..42739508c0d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ > #include "dw-edma-core.h" > > #define REGS_ADDR(name) \ > - ((dma_addr_t *)®s->name) > + ((void __force *)®s->name) > #define REGISTER(name) \ > { #name, REGS_ADDR(name) } > > @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ > > static struct dentry *base_dir; > static struct dw_edma *dw; > -static struct dw_edma_v0_regs *regs; > +static struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *regs; Shouldn't the __iomem be next to dw_edma_v0_regs instead of the variable name? I saw other drivers putting the __iomem next to the variable type, therefore I assume it's the typical coding style. > > static struct { > - void *start; > - void *end; > + void __iomem *start; > + void __iomem *end; Ditto. > } lim[2][EDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH]; > > struct debugfs_entries { > @@ -54,22 +54,23 @@ struct debugfs_entries { > > static int dw_edma_debugfs_u32_get(void *data, u64 *val) > { > + void __iomem *reg = (void __force __iomem *)data; > if (dw->mode == EDMA_MODE_LEGACY && > - data >= (void *)®s->type.legacy.ch) { > - void *ptr = (void *)®s->type.legacy.ch; > + reg >= (void __iomem *)®s->type.legacy.ch) { > + void __iomem *ptr = ®s->type.legacy.ch; > u32 viewport_sel = 0; > unsigned long flags; > u16 ch; > > for (ch = 0; ch < dw->wr_ch_cnt; ch++) > - if (lim[0][ch].start >= data && data < lim[0][ch].end) { > - ptr += (data - lim[0][ch].start); > + if (lim[0][ch].start >= reg && reg < lim[0][ch].end) { > + ptr += (reg - lim[0][ch].start); > goto legacy_sel_wr; > } > > for (ch = 0; ch < dw->rd_ch_cnt; ch++) > - if (lim[1][ch].start >= data && data < lim[1][ch].end) { > - ptr += (data - lim[1][ch].start); > + if (lim[1][ch].start >= reg && reg < lim[1][ch].end) { > + ptr += (reg - lim[1][ch].start); > goto legacy_sel_rd; > } > > @@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ static int dw_edma_debugfs_u32_get(void *data, u64 *val) > > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dw->lock, flags); > } else { > - *val = readl(data); > + *val = readl(reg); > } > > return 0; > @@ -105,7 +106,7 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(const struct debugfs_entries entries[], > } > } > > -static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs *regs, > +static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs __iomem *regs, > struct dentry *dir) > { > int nr_entries; > @@ -288,7 +289,7 @@ void dw_edma_v0_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma_chip *chip) > if (!dw) > return; > > - regs = (struct dw_edma_v0_regs *)dw->rg_region.vaddr; > + regs = dw->rg_region.vaddr; > if (!regs) > return; > > -- > 2.20.0
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:53 AM Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com> wrote: > > > > static struct dentry *base_dir; > > static struct dw_edma *dw; > > -static struct dw_edma_v0_regs *regs; > > +static struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *regs; > > Shouldn't the __iomem be next to dw_edma_v0_regs instead of the variable > name? I saw other drivers putting the __iomem next to the variable type, > therefore I assume it's the typical coding style. Yes, that seems more common indeed. Do you want to fix up both patches yourself when you apply them or should I send a new version? Arnd
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:1:1, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 10:53 AM Gustavo Pimentel > <Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com> wrote: > > > > > > > static struct dentry *base_dir; > > > static struct dw_edma *dw; > > > -static struct dw_edma_v0_regs *regs; > > > +static struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *regs; > > > > Shouldn't the __iomem be next to dw_edma_v0_regs instead of the variable > > name? I saw other drivers putting the __iomem next to the variable type, > > therefore I assume it's the typical coding style. > > Yes, that seems more common indeed. Do you want to fix up > both patches yourself when you apply them or should I send a new version? If you could do that, it will be great. Thanks. > > Arnd
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h index b6cc90cbc9dc..d03a6ad263bd 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct dw_edma_burst { struct dw_edma_region { phys_addr_t paddr; - dma_addr_t vaddr; + void __iomem * vaddr; size_t sz; }; diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c index 4c96e1c948f2..dc85f55e1bb8 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c @@ -130,19 +130,19 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, chip->id = pdev->devfn; chip->irq = pdev->irq; - dw->rg_region.vaddr = (dma_addr_t)pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->rg_bar]; + dw->rg_region.vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->rg_bar]; dw->rg_region.vaddr += pdata->rg_off; dw->rg_region.paddr = pdev->resource[pdata->rg_bar].start; dw->rg_region.paddr += pdata->rg_off; dw->rg_region.sz = pdata->rg_sz; - dw->ll_region.vaddr = (dma_addr_t)pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->ll_bar]; + dw->ll_region.vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->ll_bar]; dw->ll_region.vaddr += pdata->ll_off; dw->ll_region.paddr = pdev->resource[pdata->ll_bar].start; dw->ll_region.paddr += pdata->ll_off; dw->ll_region.sz = pdata->ll_sz; - dw->dt_region.vaddr = (dma_addr_t)pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->dt_bar]; + dw->dt_region.vaddr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[pdata->dt_bar]; dw->dt_region.vaddr += pdata->dt_off; dw->dt_region.paddr = pdev->resource[pdata->dt_bar].start; dw->dt_region.paddr += pdata->dt_off; @@ -158,17 +158,17 @@ static int dw_edma_pcie_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_dbg(pdev, "Mode:\t%s\n", dw->mode == EDMA_MODE_LEGACY ? "Legacy" : "Unroll"); - pci_dbg(pdev, "Registers:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%pa, p=%pa)\n", + pci_dbg(pdev, "Registers:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%p, p=%pa)\n", pdata->rg_bar, pdata->rg_off, pdata->rg_sz, - &dw->rg_region.vaddr, &dw->rg_region.paddr); + dw->rg_region.vaddr, &dw->rg_region.paddr); - pci_dbg(pdev, "L. List:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%pa, p=%pa)\n", + pci_dbg(pdev, "L. List:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%p, p=%pa)\n", pdata->ll_bar, pdata->ll_off, pdata->ll_sz, - &dw->ll_region.vaddr, &dw->ll_region.paddr); + dw->ll_region.vaddr, &dw->ll_region.paddr); - pci_dbg(pdev, "Data:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%pa, p=%pa)\n", + pci_dbg(pdev, "Data:\tBAR=%u, off=0x%.8lx, sz=0x%zx bytes, addr(v=%p, p=%pa)\n", pdata->dt_bar, pdata->dt_off, pdata->dt_sz, - &dw->dt_region.vaddr, &dw->dt_region.paddr); + dw->dt_region.vaddr, &dw->dt_region.paddr); pci_dbg(pdev, "Nr. IRQs:\t%u\n", dw->nr_irqs); diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c index 8cafd51ff9ec..d670ebcc37b3 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ enum dw_edma_control { static inline struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *__dw_regs(struct dw_edma *dw) { - return (struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *)dw->rg_region.vaddr; + return dw->rg_region.vaddr; } #define SET(dw, name, value) \ @@ -192,13 +192,13 @@ u32 dw_edma_v0_core_status_abort_int(struct dw_edma *dw, enum dw_edma_dir dir) static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk) { struct dw_edma_burst *child; - struct dw_edma_v0_lli *lli; - struct dw_edma_v0_llp *llp; + struct dw_edma_v0_lli __iomem *lli; + struct dw_edma_v0_llp __iomem *llp; u32 control = 0, i = 0; uintptr_t sar, dar, addr; int j; - lli = (struct dw_edma_v0_lli *)chunk->ll_region.vaddr; + lli = chunk->ll_region.vaddr; if (chunk->cb) control = DW_EDMA_V0_CB; @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void dw_edma_v0_core_write_chunk(struct dw_edma_chunk *chunk) i++; } - llp = (struct dw_edma_v0_llp *)&lli[i]; + llp = (void __iomem *)&lli[i]; control = DW_EDMA_V0_LLP | DW_EDMA_V0_TCB; if (!chunk->cb) control |= DW_EDMA_V0_CB; diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c index 5728b6fe938c..42739508c0d8 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ #include "dw-edma-core.h" #define REGS_ADDR(name) \ - ((dma_addr_t *)®s->name) + ((void __force *)®s->name) #define REGISTER(name) \ { #name, REGS_ADDR(name) } @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ static struct dentry *base_dir; static struct dw_edma *dw; -static struct dw_edma_v0_regs *regs; +static struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *regs; static struct { - void *start; - void *end; + void __iomem *start; + void __iomem *end; } lim[2][EDMA_V0_MAX_NR_CH]; struct debugfs_entries { @@ -54,22 +54,23 @@ struct debugfs_entries { static int dw_edma_debugfs_u32_get(void *data, u64 *val) { + void __iomem *reg = (void __force __iomem *)data; if (dw->mode == EDMA_MODE_LEGACY && - data >= (void *)®s->type.legacy.ch) { - void *ptr = (void *)®s->type.legacy.ch; + reg >= (void __iomem *)®s->type.legacy.ch) { + void __iomem *ptr = ®s->type.legacy.ch; u32 viewport_sel = 0; unsigned long flags; u16 ch; for (ch = 0; ch < dw->wr_ch_cnt; ch++) - if (lim[0][ch].start >= data && data < lim[0][ch].end) { - ptr += (data - lim[0][ch].start); + if (lim[0][ch].start >= reg && reg < lim[0][ch].end) { + ptr += (reg - lim[0][ch].start); goto legacy_sel_wr; } for (ch = 0; ch < dw->rd_ch_cnt; ch++) - if (lim[1][ch].start >= data && data < lim[1][ch].end) { - ptr += (data - lim[1][ch].start); + if (lim[1][ch].start >= reg && reg < lim[1][ch].end) { + ptr += (reg - lim[1][ch].start); goto legacy_sel_rd; } @@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ static int dw_edma_debugfs_u32_get(void *data, u64 *val) raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dw->lock, flags); } else { - *val = readl(data); + *val = readl(reg); } return 0; @@ -105,7 +106,7 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(const struct debugfs_entries entries[], } } -static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs *regs, +static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(struct dw_edma_v0_ch_regs __iomem *regs, struct dentry *dir) { int nr_entries; @@ -288,7 +289,7 @@ void dw_edma_v0_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma_chip *chip) if (!dw) return; - regs = (struct dw_edma_v0_regs *)dw->rg_region.vaddr; + regs = dw->rg_region.vaddr; if (!regs) return;
The new driver mixes up dma_addr_t and __iomem pointers, which results in warnings on some 32-bit architectures, like: drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c: In function '__dw_regs': drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c:28:9: error: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Werror=int-to-pointer-cast] return (struct dw_edma_v0_regs __iomem *)dw->rg_region.vaddr; Make it use __iomem pointers consistently here, and avoid using dma_addr_t for __iomem tokens altogether. A small complication here is the debugfs code, which passes an __iomem token as the private data for debugfs files, requiring the use of extra __force. Fixes: 7e4b8a4fbe2c ("dmaengine: Add Synopsys eDMA IP version 0 support") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> --- drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h | 2 +- drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-pcie.c | 18 ++++++++-------- drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 10 ++++----- drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c | 27 ++++++++++++------------ 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)