diff mbox series

ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable SPI_STM32_QSPI support

Message ID 20190729135505.15394-1-patrice.chotard@st.com (mailing list archive)
State Mainlined
Commit 2e925d23150186962497f6b91f4a6ba6c7c42b16
Headers show
Series ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable SPI_STM32_QSPI support | expand

Commit Message

Patrice CHOTARD July 29, 2019, 1:55 p.m. UTC
From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>

Enable support for QSPI block on STM32 SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Olof Johansson July 30, 2019, 5:36 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Patrice,

If you cc soc@kernel.org on patches you want us to apply, you'll get
them automatically tracked by patchwork.


-Olof

On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 3:55 PM <patrice.chotard@st.com> wrote:
>
> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
>
> Enable support for QSPI block on STM32 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> index 6a40bc2ef271..78d1d93298af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>  CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y
>  CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y
>  CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m
> +CONFIG_SPI_STM32_QSPI=m
>  CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y
>  CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>  CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Alexandre TORGUE July 31, 2019, 6:47 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Olof

On 7/30/19 7:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi Patrice,
> 
> If you cc soc@kernel.org on patches you want us to apply, you'll get
> them automatically tracked by patchwork.
> 

Does it means that you will take it directly in arm-soc tree ?
I mean, I used to take this kind of patch (multi-v7_defconfig patch 
linked to STM32 driver) in my stm32 branch and to send PR for them.

regards
Alex

> 
> -Olof
> 
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 3:55 PM <patrice.chotard@st.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
>>
>> Enable support for QSPI block on STM32 SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> index 6a40bc2ef271..78d1d93298af 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>>   CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y
>>   CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y
>>   CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m
>> +CONFIG_SPI_STM32_QSPI=m
>>   CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y
>>   CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>>   CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
Patrice CHOTARD July 31, 2019, 7:15 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi OLof

On 7/30/19 7:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi Patrice,
>
> If you cc soc@kernel.org on patches you want us to apply, you'll get
> them automatically tracked by patchwork.

Thanks for the information, i will resubmit it.

Patrice


>
>
> -Olof
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 3:55 PM <patrice.chotard@st.com> wrote:
>> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
>>
>> Enable support for QSPI block on STM32 SoCs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> index 6a40bc2ef271..78d1d93298af 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
>> @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
>>  CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y
>>  CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y
>>  CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m
>> +CONFIG_SPI_STM32_QSPI=m
>>  CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y
>>  CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>>  CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
Olof Johansson July 31, 2019, 1:20 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi,

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:48 AM Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@st.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Olof
>
> On 7/30/19 7:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > Hi Patrice,
> >
> > If you cc soc@kernel.org on patches you want us to apply, you'll get
> > them automatically tracked by patchwork.
> >
>
> Does it means that you will take it directly in arm-soc tree ?
> I mean, I used to take this kind of patch (multi-v7_defconfig patch
> linked to STM32 driver) in my stm32 branch and to send PR for them.

You can do that too -- it was unclear to me whether you posted the
patch with us in the To: line because you wanted it applied or not.


-Olof
Olof Johansson July 31, 2019, 1:21 p.m. UTC | #5
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:20 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:48 AM Alexandre Torgue
> <alexandre.torgue@st.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Olof
> >
> > On 7/30/19 7:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > Hi Patrice,
> > >
> > > If you cc soc@kernel.org on patches you want us to apply, you'll get
> > > them automatically tracked by patchwork.
> > >
> >
> > Does it means that you will take it directly in arm-soc tree ?
> > I mean, I used to take this kind of patch (multi-v7_defconfig patch
> > linked to STM32 driver) in my stm32 branch and to send PR for them.
>
> You can do that too -- it was unclear to me whether you posted the
> patch with us in the To: line because you wanted it applied or not.

Also, we request that platform maintainers keep the defconfig updates
in a separate branch, since we normally track them in a separate
branch on our side. So if you do it in the future, please send
separate PR.

For single patches, it's just as easy to send us the patch as a pull request.


Thanks,

-Olof
Alexandre TORGUE July 31, 2019, 2:40 p.m. UTC | #6
On 7/31/19 3:21 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:20 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:48 AM Alexandre Torgue
>> <alexandre.torgue@st.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Olof
>>>
>>> On 7/30/19 7:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>> Hi Patrice,
>>>>
>>>> If you cc soc@kernel.org on patches you want us to apply, you'll get
>>>> them automatically tracked by patchwork.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Does it means that you will take it directly in arm-soc tree ?
>>> I mean, I used to take this kind of patch (multi-v7_defconfig patch
>>> linked to STM32 driver) in my stm32 branch and to send PR for them.
>>
>> You can do that too -- it was unclear to me whether you posted the
>> patch with us in the To: line because you wanted it applied or not.
> 
> Also, we request that platform maintainers keep the defconfig updates
> in a separate branch, since we normally track them in a separate
> branch on our side. So if you do it in the future, please send
> separate PR.
> 
> For single patches, it's just as easy to send us the patch as a pull request.
> 

Ok. So I'll continue as I did :)

Thanks for clarifications

Alex

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -Olof
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
index 6a40bc2ef271..78d1d93298af 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
@@ -403,6 +403,7 @@  CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
 CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y
 CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y
 CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m
+CONFIG_SPI_STM32_QSPI=m
 CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y
 CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
 CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y