| Message ID | 1564684930-107089-1-git-send-email-andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] make check-unit: use after free in test-opts-visitor | expand |
Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com> writes: > In struct OptsVisitor, repeated_opts member points to a list in the > unprocessed_opts hash table after the list has been destroyed. A > subsequent call to visit_type_int() references the deleted list. It > results in use-after-free issue. Let's mention the reproducer: valgrind tests/test/opts-visitor. > Also, the Visitor object call back > functions are supposed to set the Error parameter in case of failure. As far as I can tell, they all do. The only place where you set an error is the new failure you add to lookup_scalar(). > A new mode ListMode::LM_TRAVERSED is declared to mark the list > traversal completed. > > Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com> > --- > > v2: > 01: A new mode LM_TRAVERSED has been introduced to check instead of the > repeated_opts pointer for NULL. > > qapi/opts-visitor.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/qapi/opts-visitor.c b/qapi/opts-visitor.c > index 324b197..23ac383 100644 > --- a/qapi/opts-visitor.c > +++ b/qapi/opts-visitor.c > @@ -22,33 +22,42 @@ > > enum ListMode > { > - LM_NONE, /* not traversing a list of repeated options */ > - > - LM_IN_PROGRESS, /* opts_next_list() ready to be called. > - * > - * Generating the next list link will consume the most > - * recently parsed QemuOpt instance of the repeated > - * option. > - * > - * Parsing a value into the list link will examine the > - * next QemuOpt instance of the repeated option, and > - * possibly enter LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL or > - * LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL. > - */ > - > - LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL, /* opts_next_list() has been called. > - * > - * Generating the next list link will consume the most > - * recently stored element from the signed interval, > - * parsed from the most recent QemuOpt instance of the > - * repeated option. This may consume QemuOpt itself > - * and return to LM_IN_PROGRESS. > - * > - * Parsing a value into the list link will store the > - * next element of the signed interval. > - */ > - > - LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL /* Same as above, only for an unsigned interval. */ > + LM_NONE, /* not traversing a list of repeated options */ > + > + LM_IN_PROGRESS, /* > + * opts_next_list() ready to be called. > + * > + * Generating the next list link will consume the most > + * recently parsed QemuOpt instance of the repeated > + * option. > + * > + * Parsing a value into the list link will examine the > + * next QemuOpt instance of the repeated option, and > + * possibly enter LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL or > + * LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL. > + */ > + > + LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL, /* > + * opts_next_list() has been called. > + * > + * Generating the next list link will consume the most > + * recently stored element from the signed interval, > + * parsed from the most recent QemuOpt instance of the > + * repeated option. This may consume QemuOpt itself > + * and return to LM_IN_PROGRESS. > + * > + * Parsing a value into the list link will store the > + * next element of the signed interval. > + */ > + > + LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL, /* Same as above, only for an unsigned interval. */ > + > + LM_TRAVERSED /* > + * opts_next_list() has been called. > + * > + * No more QemuOpt instance in the list. > + * The traversal has been completed. > + */ > }; > > typedef enum ListMode ListMode; Please don't change the spacing without need. The hunk should look like this: @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ enum ListMode { LM_NONE, /* not traversing a list of repeated options */ - LM_IN_PROGRESS, /* opts_next_list() ready to be called. + LM_IN_PROGRESS, /* + * opts_next_list() ready to be called. * * Generating the next list link will consume the most * recently parsed QemuOpt instance of the repeated @@ -36,7 +37,8 @@ enum ListMode * LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL. */ - LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL, /* opts_next_list() has been called. + LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL, /* + * opts_next_list() has been called. * * Generating the next list link will consume the most * recently stored element from the signed interval, @@ -48,7 +50,14 @@ enum ListMode * next element of the signed interval. */ - LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL /* Same as above, only for an unsigned interval. */ + LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL, /* Same as above, only for an unsigned interval. */ + + LM_TRAVERSED /* + * opts_next_list() has been called. + * + * No more QemuOpt instance in the list. + * The traversal has been completed. + */ }; typedef enum ListMode ListMode; > @@ -238,6 +247,8 @@ opts_next_list(Visitor *v, GenericList *tail, size_t size) > OptsVisitor *ov = to_ov(v); > > switch (ov->list_mode) { > + case LM_TRAVERSED: > + return NULL; > case LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL: > case LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL: > if (ov->list_mode == LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL) { > @@ -258,6 +269,8 @@ opts_next_list(Visitor *v, GenericList *tail, size_t size) > opt = g_queue_pop_head(ov->repeated_opts); > if (g_queue_is_empty(ov->repeated_opts)) { > g_hash_table_remove(ov->unprocessed_opts, opt->name); > + ov->repeated_opts = NULL; > + ov->list_mode = LM_TRAVERSED; > return NULL; > } > break; > @@ -289,8 +302,11 @@ opts_end_list(Visitor *v, void **obj) > > assert(ov->list_mode == LM_IN_PROGRESS || > ov->list_mode == LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL || > - ov->list_mode == LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL); > - ov->repeated_opts = NULL; > + ov->list_mode == LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL || > + ov->list_mode == LM_TRAVERSED); > + if (ov->list_mode != LM_TRAVERSED) { > + ov->repeated_opts = NULL; > + } What's wrong with zapping ov->repeated_opts unconditionally? > ov->list_mode = LM_NONE; > } > > @@ -306,6 +322,10 @@ lookup_scalar(const OptsVisitor *ov, const char *name, Error **errp) > list = lookup_distinct(ov, name, errp); > return list ? g_queue_peek_tail(list) : NULL; > } > + if (ov->list_mode == LM_TRAVERSED) { > + error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER, name); Beware, @name is null when visiting list members. The test still passes for me, since g_strdup_vprintf() formats a null argument to %s as "(null)". For what it's worth, the qobject input visitor uses QERR_MISSING_PARAMETER with a made-up name. Computing the name is pretty elaborate, see full_name_nth(). I'd rather not duplicate that here. Suggest something like error_setg(errp, "Fewer list elements than expected"); The error message fails to mention the name of the list. Bad, but the error is a corner case; we don't normally visit beyond the end of the list. For a better message, we'd have to have start_list() store its @name in struct OptsVisitor. I'm not asking you to do that now. > + return NULL; > + } > assert(ov->list_mode == LM_IN_PROGRESS); > return g_queue_peek_head(ov->repeated_opts); > } I checked the remaining uses of ->list_mode, and I think they are okay.
On 02/08/2019 14:34, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com> writes: > >> In struct OptsVisitor, repeated_opts member points to a list in the >> unprocessed_opts hash table after the list has been destroyed. A >> subsequent call to visit_type_int() references the deleted list. It >> results in use-after-free issue. > > Let's mention the reproducer: valgrind tests/test/opts-visitor. > >> Also, the Visitor object call back >> functions are supposed to set the Error parameter in case of failure. > > As far as I can tell, they all do. The only place where you set an > error is the new failure you add to lookup_scalar(). > The story behind the comment is that the original tests/test-opts-visitor fails being run under the Valgrind with the error message: test-opts-visitor: util/error.c:276: error_free_or_abort: Assertion `errp && *errp' failed. coming from assert(errp && *errp); error_free_or_abort (util/error.c:276) test_opts_range_beyond (tests/test-opts-visitor.c:241) because g_queue_peek_head() returns NULL under the Valgrind and errp stays unset. Without the Valgrind, the g_queue_peek_head() returns a non-zero pointer and the opts_type_int64() sets the following error: "Parameter '\340F\212\274\267U' expects an int64 value or range", err_class = ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR, src = 0x55b7bbc02163 "qapi/opts-visitor.c", func = 0x55b7bbc02410 <__func__.14916> "opts_type_int64", line = 433, hint = 0x0} so, error_free_or_abort() doesn't abort and the test case passes. I will remove the comment in v3. Andrey >> A new mode ListMode::LM_TRAVERSED is declared to mark the list >> traversal completed. >> >> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> >> Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com> >> --- >> >> v2: >> 01: A new mode LM_TRAVERSED has been introduced to check instead of the >> repeated_opts pointer for NULL. >> >> qapi/opts-visitor.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- >> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/qapi/opts-visitor.c b/qapi/opts-visitor.c >> index 324b197..23ac383 100644 >> --- a/qapi/opts-visitor.c >> +++ b/qapi/opts-visitor.c >> @@ -22,33 +22,42 @@ >> >> enum ListMode >> { >> - LM_NONE, /* not traversing a list of repeated options */ >> - >> - LM_IN_PROGRESS, /* opts_next_list() ready to be called. >> - * >> - * Generating the next list link will consume the most >> - * recently parsed QemuOpt instance of the repeated >> - * option. >> - * >> - * Parsing a value into the list link will examine the >> - * next QemuOpt instance of the repeated option, and >> - * possibly enter LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL or >> - * LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL. >> - */ >> - >> - LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL, /* opts_next_list() has been called. >> - * >> - * Generating the next list link will consume the most >> - * recently stored element from the signed interval, >> - * parsed from the most recent QemuOpt instance of the >> - * repeated option. This may consume QemuOpt itself >> - * and return to LM_IN_PROGRESS. >> - * >> - * Parsing a value into the list link will store the >> - * next element of the signed interval. >> - */ >> - >> - LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL /* Same as above, only for an unsigned interval. */ >> + LM_NONE, /* not traversing a list of repeated options */ >> + >> + LM_IN_PROGRESS, /* >> + * opts_next_list() ready to be called. >> + * >> + * Generating the next list link will consume the most >> + * recently parsed QemuOpt instance of the repeated >> + * option. >> + * >> + * Parsing a value into the list link will examine the >> + * next QemuOpt instance of the repeated option, and >> + * possibly enter LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL or >> + * LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL. >> + */ >> + >> + LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL, /* >> + * opts_next_list() has been called. >> + * >> + * Generating the next list link will consume the most >> + * recently stored element from the signed interval, >> + * parsed from the most recent QemuOpt instance of the >> + * repeated option. This may consume QemuOpt itself >> + * and return to LM_IN_PROGRESS. >> + * >> + * Parsing a value into the list link will store the >> + * next element of the signed interval. >> + */ >> + >> + LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL, /* Same as above, only for an unsigned interval. */ >> + >> + LM_TRAVERSED /* >> + * opts_next_list() has been called. >> + * >> + * No more QemuOpt instance in the list. >> + * The traversal has been completed. >> + */ >> }; >> >> typedef enum ListMode ListMode; > > Please don't change the spacing without need. The hunk should look like > this: > > @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ enum ListMode > { > LM_NONE, /* not traversing a list of repeated options */ > > - LM_IN_PROGRESS, /* opts_next_list() ready to be called. > + LM_IN_PROGRESS, /* > + * opts_next_list() ready to be called. > * > * Generating the next list link will consume the most > * recently parsed QemuOpt instance of the repeated > @@ -36,7 +37,8 @@ enum ListMode > * LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL. > */ > > - LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL, /* opts_next_list() has been called. > + LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL, /* > + * opts_next_list() has been called. > * > * Generating the next list link will consume the most > * recently stored element from the signed interval, > @@ -48,7 +50,14 @@ enum ListMode > * next element of the signed interval. > */ > > - LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL /* Same as above, only for an unsigned interval. */ > + LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL, /* Same as above, only for an unsigned interval. */ > + > + LM_TRAVERSED /* > + * opts_next_list() has been called. > + * > + * No more QemuOpt instance in the list. > + * The traversal has been completed. > + */ > }; > > typedef enum ListMode ListMode; > >> @@ -238,6 +247,8 @@ opts_next_list(Visitor *v, GenericList *tail, size_t size) >> OptsVisitor *ov = to_ov(v); >> >> switch (ov->list_mode) { >> + case LM_TRAVERSED: >> + return NULL; >> case LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL: >> case LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL: >> if (ov->list_mode == LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL) { >> @@ -258,6 +269,8 @@ opts_next_list(Visitor *v, GenericList *tail, size_t size) >> opt = g_queue_pop_head(ov->repeated_opts); >> if (g_queue_is_empty(ov->repeated_opts)) { >> g_hash_table_remove(ov->unprocessed_opts, opt->name); >> + ov->repeated_opts = NULL; >> + ov->list_mode = LM_TRAVERSED; >> return NULL; >> } >> break; >> @@ -289,8 +302,11 @@ opts_end_list(Visitor *v, void **obj) >> >> assert(ov->list_mode == LM_IN_PROGRESS || >> ov->list_mode == LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL || >> - ov->list_mode == LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL); >> - ov->repeated_opts = NULL; >> + ov->list_mode == LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL || >> + ov->list_mode == LM_TRAVERSED); >> + if (ov->list_mode != LM_TRAVERSED) { >> + ov->repeated_opts = NULL; >> + } > > What's wrong with zapping ov->repeated_opts unconditionally? > >> ov->list_mode = LM_NONE; >> } >> >> @@ -306,6 +322,10 @@ lookup_scalar(const OptsVisitor *ov, const char *name, Error **errp) >> list = lookup_distinct(ov, name, errp); >> return list ? g_queue_peek_tail(list) : NULL; >> } >> + if (ov->list_mode == LM_TRAVERSED) { >> + error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER, name); > > Beware, @name is null when visiting list members. The test still passes > for me, since g_strdup_vprintf() formats a null argument to %s as > "(null)". > > For what it's worth, the qobject input visitor uses > QERR_MISSING_PARAMETER with a made-up name. Computing the name is > pretty elaborate, see full_name_nth(). I'd rather not duplicate that > here. > > Suggest something like > > error_setg(errp, "Fewer list elements than expected"); > > The error message fails to mention the name of the list. Bad, but the > error is a corner case; we don't normally visit beyond the end of the > list. For a better message, we'd have to have start_list() store its > @name in struct OptsVisitor. I'm not asking you to do that now. > Will I do that work to add the @name of the list to the struct OptsVisitor in a following series? >> + return NULL; >> + } >> assert(ov->list_mode == LM_IN_PROGRESS); >> return g_queue_peek_head(ov->repeated_opts); >> } > > I checked the remaining uses of ->list_mode, and I think they are okay. > Thank you. I also had not noticed any potential issue with the list_mode. Andrey
Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com> writes: > On 02/08/2019 14:34, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com> writes: >> >>> In struct OptsVisitor, repeated_opts member points to a list in the >>> unprocessed_opts hash table after the list has been destroyed. A >>> subsequent call to visit_type_int() references the deleted list. It >>> results in use-after-free issue. >> >> Let's mention the reproducer: valgrind tests/test/opts-visitor. >> >>> Also, the Visitor object call back >>> functions are supposed to set the Error parameter in case of failure. >> >> As far as I can tell, they all do. The only place where you set an >> error is the new failure you add to lookup_scalar(). >> > > The story behind the comment is that the original > tests/test-opts-visitor fails being run under the Valgrind with the > error message: > > test-opts-visitor: util/error.c:276: error_free_or_abort: Assertion > `errp && *errp' failed. > > coming from > > assert(errp && *errp); > error_free_or_abort (util/error.c:276) > test_opts_range_beyond (tests/test-opts-visitor.c:241) > > because g_queue_peek_head() returns NULL under the Valgrind and errp > stays unset. > > Without the Valgrind, the g_queue_peek_head() returns a non-zero pointer > and the opts_type_int64() sets the following error: > > "Parameter '\340F\212\274\267U' expects an int64 value or range", > err_class = ERROR_CLASS_GENERIC_ERROR, src = 0x55b7bbc02163 > "qapi/opts-visitor.c", > func = 0x55b7bbc02410 <__func__.14916> "opts_type_int64", line = 433, > hint = 0x0} > > so, error_free_or_abort() doesn't abort and the test case passes. > > I will remove the comment in v3. Thanks. [...] >>> diff --git a/qapi/opts-visitor.c b/qapi/opts-visitor.c >>> index 324b197..23ac383 100644 >>> --- a/qapi/opts-visitor.c >>> +++ b/qapi/opts-visitor.c [...] >>> @@ -289,8 +302,11 @@ opts_end_list(Visitor *v, void **obj) >>> >>> assert(ov->list_mode == LM_IN_PROGRESS || >>> ov->list_mode == LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL || >>> - ov->list_mode == LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL); >>> - ov->repeated_opts = NULL; >>> + ov->list_mode == LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL || >>> + ov->list_mode == LM_TRAVERSED); >>> + if (ov->list_mode != LM_TRAVERSED) { >>> + ov->repeated_opts = NULL; >>> + } >> >> What's wrong with zapping ov->repeated_opts unconditionally? >> >>> ov->list_mode = LM_NONE; >>> } >>> >>> @@ -306,6 +322,10 @@ lookup_scalar(const OptsVisitor *ov, const char *name, Error **errp) >>> list = lookup_distinct(ov, name, errp); >>> return list ? g_queue_peek_tail(list) : NULL; >>> } >>> + if (ov->list_mode == LM_TRAVERSED) { >>> + error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER, name); >> >> Beware, @name is null when visiting list members. The test still passes >> for me, since g_strdup_vprintf() formats a null argument to %s as >> "(null)". >> >> For what it's worth, the qobject input visitor uses >> QERR_MISSING_PARAMETER with a made-up name. Computing the name is >> pretty elaborate, see full_name_nth(). I'd rather not duplicate that >> here. >> >> Suggest something like >> >> error_setg(errp, "Fewer list elements than expected"); >> >> The error message fails to mention the name of the list. Bad, but the >> error is a corner case; we don't normally visit beyond the end of the >> list. For a better message, we'd have to have start_list() store its >> @name in struct OptsVisitor. I'm not asking you to do that now. >> > > Will I do that work to add the @name of the list to the struct > OptsVisitor in a following series? Entirely up to you. To be honest, I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. >>> + return NULL; >>> + } >>> assert(ov->list_mode == LM_IN_PROGRESS); >>> return g_queue_peek_head(ov->repeated_opts); >>> } >> >> I checked the remaining uses of ->list_mode, and I think they are okay. >> > Thank you. I also had not noticed any potential issue with the list_mode. Good :)
diff --git a/qapi/opts-visitor.c b/qapi/opts-visitor.c index 324b197..23ac383 100644 --- a/qapi/opts-visitor.c +++ b/qapi/opts-visitor.c @@ -22,33 +22,42 @@ enum ListMode { - LM_NONE, /* not traversing a list of repeated options */ - - LM_IN_PROGRESS, /* opts_next_list() ready to be called. - * - * Generating the next list link will consume the most - * recently parsed QemuOpt instance of the repeated - * option. - * - * Parsing a value into the list link will examine the - * next QemuOpt instance of the repeated option, and - * possibly enter LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL or - * LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL. - */ - - LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL, /* opts_next_list() has been called. - * - * Generating the next list link will consume the most - * recently stored element from the signed interval, - * parsed from the most recent QemuOpt instance of the - * repeated option. This may consume QemuOpt itself - * and return to LM_IN_PROGRESS. - * - * Parsing a value into the list link will store the - * next element of the signed interval. - */ - - LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL /* Same as above, only for an unsigned interval. */ + LM_NONE, /* not traversing a list of repeated options */ + + LM_IN_PROGRESS, /* + * opts_next_list() ready to be called. + * + * Generating the next list link will consume the most + * recently parsed QemuOpt instance of the repeated + * option. + * + * Parsing a value into the list link will examine the + * next QemuOpt instance of the repeated option, and + * possibly enter LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL or + * LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL. + */ + + LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL, /* + * opts_next_list() has been called. + * + * Generating the next list link will consume the most + * recently stored element from the signed interval, + * parsed from the most recent QemuOpt instance of the + * repeated option. This may consume QemuOpt itself + * and return to LM_IN_PROGRESS. + * + * Parsing a value into the list link will store the + * next element of the signed interval. + */ + + LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL, /* Same as above, only for an unsigned interval. */ + + LM_TRAVERSED /* + * opts_next_list() has been called. + * + * No more QemuOpt instance in the list. + * The traversal has been completed. + */ }; typedef enum ListMode ListMode; @@ -238,6 +247,8 @@ opts_next_list(Visitor *v, GenericList *tail, size_t size) OptsVisitor *ov = to_ov(v); switch (ov->list_mode) { + case LM_TRAVERSED: + return NULL; case LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL: case LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL: if (ov->list_mode == LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL) { @@ -258,6 +269,8 @@ opts_next_list(Visitor *v, GenericList *tail, size_t size) opt = g_queue_pop_head(ov->repeated_opts); if (g_queue_is_empty(ov->repeated_opts)) { g_hash_table_remove(ov->unprocessed_opts, opt->name); + ov->repeated_opts = NULL; + ov->list_mode = LM_TRAVERSED; return NULL; } break; @@ -289,8 +302,11 @@ opts_end_list(Visitor *v, void **obj) assert(ov->list_mode == LM_IN_PROGRESS || ov->list_mode == LM_SIGNED_INTERVAL || - ov->list_mode == LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL); - ov->repeated_opts = NULL; + ov->list_mode == LM_UNSIGNED_INTERVAL || + ov->list_mode == LM_TRAVERSED); + if (ov->list_mode != LM_TRAVERSED) { + ov->repeated_opts = NULL; + } ov->list_mode = LM_NONE; } @@ -306,6 +322,10 @@ lookup_scalar(const OptsVisitor *ov, const char *name, Error **errp) list = lookup_distinct(ov, name, errp); return list ? g_queue_peek_tail(list) : NULL; } + if (ov->list_mode == LM_TRAVERSED) { + error_setg(errp, QERR_INVALID_PARAMETER, name); + return NULL; + } assert(ov->list_mode == LM_IN_PROGRESS); return g_queue_peek_head(ov->repeated_opts); }
In struct OptsVisitor, repeated_opts member points to a list in the unprocessed_opts hash table after the list has been destroyed. A subsequent call to visit_type_int() references the deleted list. It results in use-after-free issue. Also, the Visitor object call back functions are supposed to set the Error parameter in case of failure. A new mode ListMode::LM_TRAVERSED is declared to mark the list traversal completed. Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com> --- v2: 01: A new mode LM_TRAVERSED has been introduced to check instead of the repeated_opts pointer for NULL. qapi/opts-visitor.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)