diff mbox series

rt2x00: do not set IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK on tx status

Message ID 1566544196-20371-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 567a9b766b47caffe4b1bf74823e7bc18532d875
Delegated to: Kalle Valo
Headers show
Series rt2x00: do not set IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK on tx status | expand

Commit Message

Stanislaw Gruszka Aug. 23, 2019, 7:09 a.m. UTC
According to documentation IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK is suppose
to be used when we do not recive BA (BlockAck). However on rt2x00 we
use it when remote station fail to decode one or more subframes within
AMPDU (some bits are not set in BlockAck bitmap). Setting the flag result
in sent of BAR (BlockAck Request) frame and this might result of abuse
of BA session, since remote station can sent BA with incorrect
sequence numbers after receiving BAR. This problem is visible especially
when connecting two rt2800 devices.

Previously I observed some performance benefits when using the flag
when connecting with iwlwifi devices. But currently possibly due
to reacent changes in rt2x00 removing the flag has no effect on
those test cases.

So remove the IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK.

Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Kalle Valo Sept. 3, 2019, 1:41 p.m. UTC | #1
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> wrote:

> According to documentation IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK is suppose
> to be used when we do not recive BA (BlockAck). However on rt2x00 we
> use it when remote station fail to decode one or more subframes within
> AMPDU (some bits are not set in BlockAck bitmap). Setting the flag result
> in sent of BAR (BlockAck Request) frame and this might result of abuse
> of BA session, since remote station can sent BA with incorrect
> sequence numbers after receiving BAR. This problem is visible especially
> when connecting two rt2800 devices.
> 
> Previously I observed some performance benefits when using the flag
> when connecting with iwlwifi devices. But currently possibly due
> to reacent changes in rt2x00 removing the flag has no effect on
> those test cases.
> 
> So remove the IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

567a9b766b47 rt2x00: do not set IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK on tx status
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
index 9d158237ac67..c3eab767bc21 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
@@ -371,9 +371,6 @@  static void rt2x00lib_fill_tx_status(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev,
 				  IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU;
 		tx_info->status.ampdu_len = 1;
 		tx_info->status.ampdu_ack_len = success ? 1 : 0;
-
-		if (!success)
-			tx_info->flags |= IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU_NO_BACK;
 	}
 
 	if (rate_flags & IEEE80211_TX_RC_USE_RTS_CTS) {