Message ID | 20190904204427.1e1a064f@canb.auug.org.au (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the arm-soc tree | expand |
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:44 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > diff --cc drivers/dma/iop-adma.c > index 03f4a588cf7f,003b753e4604..000000000000 > --- a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c > +++ b/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c > @@@ -116,9 -116,9 +116,9 @@@ static void __iop_adma_slot_cleanup(str > list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, _iter, &iop_chan->chain, > chain_node) { > pr_debug("\tcookie: %d slot: %d busy: %d " > - "this_desc: %#x next_desc: %#llx ack: %d\n", > - "this_desc: %pad next_desc: %#x ack: %d\n", > ++ "this_desc: %pad next_desc: %#llx ack: %d\n", > iter->async_tx.cookie, iter->idx, busy, > - iter->async_tx.phys, (u64)iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter), > - &iter->async_tx.phys, iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter), > ++ &iter->async_tx.phys, (u64)iop_desc_get_next_desc(iter), > async_tx_test_ack(&iter->async_tx)); > prefetch(_iter); > prefetch(&_iter->async_tx); The resolution looks correct to me. I had to research how I missed this, and it turns out that the problem is me testing with clang-9 rather than gcc at the moment. While clang is perfectly capable of warning about this issue, the kernel turns off -Wno-format when building with clang. Arnd
diff --cc drivers/dma/iop-adma.c index 03f4a588cf7f,003b753e4604..000000000000 --- a/drivers/dma/iop-adma.c