Message ID | 20190917155426.7432-18-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | mtd: spi-nor: Quad Enable and (un)lock methods | expand |
Hi Tudor [...] On 17-Sep-19 9:25 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote: > +static int spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new, > + u8 mask) > +{ > + int ret; > + u8 *sr_cr = nor->bouncebuf; > + u8 cr_written; > + > + /* Make sure we don't overwrite the contents of Status Register 2. */ > + if (!(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR)) { Assuming SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR is not set... > + ret = spi_nor_read_cr(nor, &sr_cr[1]); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } else if (nor->flash.quad_enable) { > + /* > + * If the Status Register 2 Read command (35h) is not > + * supported, we should at least be sure we don't > + * change the value of the SR2 Quad Enable bit. > + * > + * We can safely assume that when the Quad Enable method is > + * set, the value of the QE bit is one, as a consequence of the > + * nor->flash.quad_enable() call. > + * > + * We can safely assume that the Quad Enable bit is present in > + * the Status Register 2 at BIT(1). According to the JESD216 > + * revB standard, BFPT DWORDS[15], bits 22:20, the 16-bit > + * Write Status (01h) command is available just for the cases > + * in which the QE bit is described in SR2 at BIT(1). > + */ > + sr_cr[1] = CR_QUAD_EN_SPAN; > + } else { > + sr_cr[1] = 0; > + } > + CR_QUAD_EN_SPAN will not be in sr_cr[1] when we reach here. So code won't enable quad mode. > + sr_cr[0] = status_new; > + > + ret = spi_nor_write_sr(nor, sr_cr, 2); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + cr_written = sr_cr[1]; > + > + ret = spi_nor_read_sr(nor, &sr_cr[0]); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + if ((sr_cr[0] & mask) != (status_new & mask)) { > + dev_err(nor->dev, "Read back test failed\n"); > + return -EIO; > + } > + > + if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR) > + return 0; > + > + ret = spi_nor_read_cr(nor, &sr_cr[1]); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + if (cr_written != sr_cr[1]) { > + dev_err(nor->dev, "Read back test failed\n"); > + return -EIO; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + Regards Vignesh
On 09/19/2019 05:33 PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > Hi Tudor > Hi, Vignesh, > [...] > > On 17-Sep-19 9:25 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote: >> +static int spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new, >> + u8 mask) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + u8 *sr_cr = nor->bouncebuf; >> + u8 cr_written; >> + >> + /* Make sure we don't overwrite the contents of Status Register 2. */ >> + if (!(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR)) { > Assuming SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR is not set... > when SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR is not set, I read the Status Register 2 on the next line: >> + ret = spi_nor_read_cr(nor, &sr_cr[1]); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + } else if (nor->flash.quad_enable) { >> + /* >> + * If the Status Register 2 Read command (35h) is not >> + * supported, we should at least be sure we don't >> + * change the value of the SR2 Quad Enable bit. >> + * >> + * We can safely assume that when the Quad Enable method is >> + * set, the value of the QE bit is one, as a consequence of the >> + * nor->flash.quad_enable() call. >> + * >> + * We can safely assume that the Quad Enable bit is present in >> + * the Status Register 2 at BIT(1). According to the JESD216 >> + * revB standard, BFPT DWORDS[15], bits 22:20, the 16-bit >> + * Write Status (01h) command is available just for the cases >> + * in which the QE bit is described in SR2 at BIT(1). >> + */ when SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR is set and nor->flash.quad_enable != NULL, Status Register 2 (CR) is equal to CR_QUAD_EN_SPAN. >> + sr_cr[1] = CR_QUAD_EN_SPAN; >> + } else { if SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR is set and nor->flash.quad_enable == NULL we don't need to enable Quad Mode, so Status Register 2 is 0. >> + sr_cr[1] = 0; >> + } >> + > CR_QUAD_EN_SPAN will not be in sr_cr[1] when we reach here. So code > won't enable quad mode. > >
Hi, Vignesh, On 09/19/2019 05:33 PM, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > External E-Mail > > > Hi Tudor > > [...] > > On 17-Sep-19 9:25 PM, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote: >> +static int spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new, >> + u8 mask) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + u8 *sr_cr = nor->bouncebuf; >> + u8 cr_written; >> + >> + /* Make sure we don't overwrite the contents of Status Register 2. */ >> + if (!(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR)) { > > Assuming SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR is not set... > >> + ret = spi_nor_read_cr(nor, &sr_cr[1]); >> + if (ret) >> + return ret; >> + } else if (nor->flash.quad_enable) { >> + /* >> + * If the Status Register 2 Read command (35h) is not >> + * supported, we should at least be sure we don't >> + * change the value of the SR2 Quad Enable bit. >> + * >> + * We can safely assume that when the Quad Enable method is >> + * set, the value of the QE bit is one, as a consequence of the >> + * nor->flash.quad_enable() call. >> + * >> + * We can safely assume that the Quad Enable bit is present in >> + * the Status Register 2 at BIT(1). According to the JESD216 >> + * revB standard, BFPT DWORDS[15], bits 22:20, the 16-bit >> + * Write Status (01h) command is available just for the cases >> + * in which the QE bit is described in SR2 at BIT(1). >> + */ >> + sr_cr[1] = CR_QUAD_EN_SPAN; >> + } else { >> + sr_cr[1] = 0; >> + } >> + > > CR_QUAD_EN_SPAN will not be in sr_cr[1] when we reach here. So code > won't enable quad mode. > I get the problem now. spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check() does not modify the value of the QE bit, which is good in the lock/unlock() case. We want to lock/unlock() without enabling or disabling the Quad Mode. As you found, the problem comes later in spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable() because I use there spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check() which keeps the value of the QE bit, without setting it to one, so the spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable() did not enable the Quad Mode if not previously enabled. What I'll do is to introduce a new argument to: static int spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new, u8 mask, bool set_quad_enable) and do a if (set_quad_enable) sr_cr[1] |= CR_QUAD_EN_SPAN; after initializing sr_cr[1] The lock/unlock() methods will call the function with set_quad_enable being false (we don't want to modify the QE value), and the spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable() will call it with set_quad_enable being true, we want to set QE to one (we don't care of the QE bit previous value). We'll avoid code duplication, lock/unlock() and spi_nor_sr2_bit1_quad_enable() calling the same method. Cheers, ta
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c index 303a7bcf3423..4a513ed13807 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c @@ -836,6 +836,132 @@ static int spi_nor_read_sr2(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 *sr2) return ret; } +/** + * spi_nor_write_sr1_and_check() - Write one byte to the Status Register and + * ensure the bits in the mask match the written value. + * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'. + * status_new: byte value to be written to the Status Register. + * mask: mask with which to check the written value. + * + * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise. + */ +static int spi_nor_write_sr1_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new, + u8 mask) +{ + int ret; + + nor->bouncebuf[0] = status_new; + + ret = spi_nor_write_sr(nor, &nor->bouncebuf[0], 1); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = spi_nor_read_sr(nor, &nor->bouncebuf[0]); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if ((nor->bouncebuf[0] & mask) != (status_new & mask)) { + dev_err(nor->dev, "Read back test failed\n"); + return -EIO; + } + + return 0; +} + +/** + * spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check() - Write the Status Register 1 and the + * Status Register 2 in one shot. Ensure that the bits in the mask match the + * written value in the Status Register 1, and that the 16-bit Write did not + * affect what was already in the Status Register 2. + * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'. + * status_new: byte value to be written to the Status Register 1. + * mask: mask with which to check the written value on Status Register 1. + * + * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise. + */ +static int spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new, + u8 mask) +{ + int ret; + u8 *sr_cr = nor->bouncebuf; + u8 cr_written; + + /* Make sure we don't overwrite the contents of Status Register 2. */ + if (!(nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR)) { + ret = spi_nor_read_cr(nor, &sr_cr[1]); + if (ret) + return ret; + } else if (nor->flash.quad_enable) { + /* + * If the Status Register 2 Read command (35h) is not + * supported, we should at least be sure we don't + * change the value of the SR2 Quad Enable bit. + * + * We can safely assume that when the Quad Enable method is + * set, the value of the QE bit is one, as a consequence of the + * nor->flash.quad_enable() call. + * + * We can safely assume that the Quad Enable bit is present in + * the Status Register 2 at BIT(1). According to the JESD216 + * revB standard, BFPT DWORDS[15], bits 22:20, the 16-bit + * Write Status (01h) command is available just for the cases + * in which the QE bit is described in SR2 at BIT(1). + */ + sr_cr[1] = CR_QUAD_EN_SPAN; + } else { + sr_cr[1] = 0; + } + + sr_cr[0] = status_new; + + ret = spi_nor_write_sr(nor, sr_cr, 2); + if (ret) + return ret; + + cr_written = sr_cr[1]; + + ret = spi_nor_read_sr(nor, &sr_cr[0]); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if ((sr_cr[0] & mask) != (status_new & mask)) { + dev_err(nor->dev, "Read back test failed\n"); + return -EIO; + } + + if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR) + return 0; + + ret = spi_nor_read_cr(nor, &sr_cr[1]); + if (ret) + return ret; + + if (cr_written != sr_cr[1]) { + dev_err(nor->dev, "Read back test failed\n"); + return -EIO; + } + + return 0; +} + +/** + * spi_nor_write_sr_and_check() - Write the Status Register and ensure the bits + * in the mask match the written values. + * @nor: pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'. + * status_new: byte value to be written to the Status Register. + * mask: mask with which to check the written values. + * + * Return: 0 on success, -errno otherwise. + */ +static int spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new, + u8 mask) +{ + if (nor->flags == SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR) + return spi_nor_write_16bit_sr_and_check(nor, status_new, mask); + + return spi_nor_write_sr1_and_check(nor, status_new, mask); +} + static struct spi_nor *mtd_to_spi_nor(struct mtd_info *mtd) { return mtd->priv; @@ -1492,24 +1618,6 @@ static int spi_nor_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr) return ret; } -/* Write status register and ensure bits in mask match written values */ -static int write_sr_and_check(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 status_new, u8 mask) -{ - int ret; - - nor->bouncebuf[0] = status_new; - - ret = spi_nor_write_sr(nor, &nor->bouncebuf[0], 1); - if (ret) - return ret; - - ret = spi_nor_read_sr(nor, &nor->bouncebuf[0]); - if (ret) - return ret; - - return ((nor->bouncebuf[0] & mask) != (status_new & mask)) ? -EIO : 0; -} - static void stm_get_locked_range(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr, loff_t *ofs, uint64_t *len) { @@ -1673,7 +1781,7 @@ static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) if ((status_new & mask) < (status_old & mask)) return -EINVAL; - return write_sr_and_check(nor, status_new, mask); + return spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(nor, status_new, mask); } /* @@ -1758,7 +1866,7 @@ static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len) if ((status_new & mask) > (status_old & mask)) return -EINVAL; - return write_sr_and_check(nor, status_new, mask); + return spi_nor_write_sr_and_check(nor, status_new, mask); } /* @@ -3536,19 +3644,39 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_bfpt(struct spi_nor *nor, break; case BFPT_DWORD15_QER_SR2_BIT1_BUGGY: + /* + * Writing only one byte to the Status Register has the + * side-effect of clearing Status Register 2. + */ + /* fall through */ case BFPT_DWORD15_QER_SR2_BIT1_NO_RD: + nor->flags |= SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR; + /* + * Read Configuration Register (35h) instruction is not + * supported. + */ + nor->flags |= SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR; flash->quad_enable = spansion_no_read_cr_quad_enable; break; case BFPT_DWORD15_QER_SR1_BIT6: + nor->flags &= ~SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR; flash->quad_enable = macronix_quad_enable; break; case BFPT_DWORD15_QER_SR2_BIT7: + nor->flags &= ~SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR; flash->quad_enable = sr2_bit7_quad_enable; break; case BFPT_DWORD15_QER_SR2_BIT1: + /* + * JESD216 rev B or later does not specify if writing only one + * byte to the Status Register clears or not the Status + * Register 2, so let's be cautious and keep the default + * assumption of a 16-bit Write Status (01h) command. + */ + nor->flags |= SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR; flash->quad_enable = spansion_read_cr_quad_enable; break; @@ -4515,6 +4643,8 @@ static void spi_nor_info_init_flash_params(struct spi_nor *nor) flash->quad_enable = spansion_read_cr_quad_enable; flash->set_4byte = spansion_set_4byte; flash->setup = spi_nor_default_setup; + /* Default to 16-bit Write Status (01h) Command */ + nor->flags |= SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR; /* Set SPI NOR sizes. */ flash->size = (u64)info->sector_size * info->n_sectors; diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h index 12961b157743..fc3a8f5209f0 100644 --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h @@ -243,6 +243,8 @@ enum spi_nor_option_flags { SNOR_F_4B_OPCODES = BIT(6), SNOR_F_HAS_4BAIT = BIT(7), SNOR_F_HAS_LOCK = BIT(8), + SNOR_F_HAS_16BIT_SR = BIT(9), + SNOR_F_NO_READ_CR = BIT(10), }; /**