Message ID | 3cf2076e-6394-4997-613d-cbf5b6dbee1e@web.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | EDAC: Armada XP: Use devm_platform_ioremap_resource() in two functions | expand |
Hi Markus, On 21.09.19 17:57:24, Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 17:50:17 +0200 > > Simplify these function implementations by using a known function. > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Which semantic patch did you use here? The kernel's spatch for this pattern only found and fixed the following: $ make coccicheck COCCI=scripts/coccinelle/api/devm_platform_ioremap_resource.cocci MODE=patch M=drivers/edac | patch -p1 patching file drivers/edac/ti_edac.c patching file drivers/edac/xgene_edac.c patching file drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c There are probably more drivers to fix than the above and the one you fixed: $ git grep -l platform_get_resource drivers/edac/ drivers/edac/altera_edac.c drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c drivers/edac/aspeed_edac.c drivers/edac/bluefield_edac.c drivers/edac/cpc925_edac.c drivers/edac/highbank_l2_edac.c drivers/edac/highbank_mc_edac.c drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c drivers/edac/ti_edac.c drivers/edac/xgene_edac.c So while at it, how about fixing the .cocci patch in scripts/ and run it for drivers/edac? There should be one patch only for all edac drivers. Thanks, -Robert
> Which semantic patch did you use here? I suggest to take another look at details around background information on a subject like “Coccinelle: api: add devm_platform_ioremap_resource script”. https://lore.kernel.org/r/2cacd712-a8b8-6471-a9b4-23ba54434c02@web.de/ https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-September/006303.html https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/19/81 > There are probably more drivers to fix than the above and the one you fixed: Yes, of course. I concentrated my update suggestions on a specific source code transformation variant recently. > So while at it, how about fixing the .cocci patch in scripts/ and run > it for drivers/edac? Some developers are trying to improve affected software components further. Did you eventually receive similar patches already by other contributors? > There should be one patch only for all edac drivers. Is there consensus for this kind of change expectation? Regards, Markus
diff --git a/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c b/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c index 7f227bdcbc84..096d8de3893e 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/armada_xp_edac.c @@ -286,17 +286,10 @@ static int axp_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) struct edac_mc_layer layers[1]; const struct of_device_id *id; struct mem_ctl_info *mci; - struct resource *r; void __iomem *base; uint32_t config; - r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); - if (!r) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to get mem resource\n"); - return -ENODEV; - } - - base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r); + base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); if (IS_ERR(base)) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to map regs\n"); return PTR_ERR(base); @@ -516,15 +509,8 @@ static int aurora_l2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) const struct of_device_id *id; uint32_t l2x0_aux_ctrl; void __iomem *base; - struct resource *r; - - r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); - if (!r) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to get mem resource\n"); - return -ENODEV; - } - base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r); + base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0); if (IS_ERR(base)) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to map regs\n"); return PTR_ERR(base);