| Message ID | 20191002100844.10490-1-colin.king@canonical.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined |
| Commit | 1b98ad3b3be98f2c99f4d63679511eb97a26b8bb |
| Headers | show |
| Series | pwm: sun4i: redundant assignment to variable pval | expand |
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:08:44AM +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Variable pval is being assigned a value that is never read. The > assignment is redundant and hence can be removed. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > index 6f5840a1a82d..53970d4ba695 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm, > if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) { > /* First, test without any prescaler when available */ > prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK; > - pval = 1; > /* > * When not using any prescaler, the clock period in nanoseconds > * is not an integer so round it half up instead of Looks fine, the issue exists since deb9c462f4e539cc7f8389b9855eb7a507c78e7e. You can even make pval a local variable for the second for loop. Best regards Uwe
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:08:44AM +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Variable pval is being assigned a value that is never read. The > assignment is redundant and hence can be removed. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) Applied, thanks. Thierry
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:08:44AM +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Variable pval is being assigned a value that is never read. The > assignment is redundant and hence can be removed. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > --- > drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > index 6f5840a1a82d..53970d4ba695 100644 > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm, > if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) { > /* First, test without any prescaler when available */ > prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK; > - pval = 1; > /* > * When not using any prescaler, the clock period in nanoseconds > * is not an integer so round it half up instead of Are you sure? It looks used to me. regards, dan carpenter
On 02/10/2019 14:25, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:08:44AM +0100, Colin King wrote: >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >> >> Variable pval is being assigned a value that is never read. The >> assignment is redundant and hence can be removed. >> >> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >> --- >> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c >> index 6f5840a1a82d..53970d4ba695 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c >> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c >> @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm, >> if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) { >> /* First, test without any prescaler when available */ >> prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK; >> - pval = 1; >> /* >> * When not using any prescaler, the clock period in nanoseconds >> * is not an integer so round it half up instead of > > Are you sure? It looks used to me. It's only read in a do_div() and before that it is being assigned: pval = prescaler_table[prescaler]; div = clk_rate; do_div(div, pval); so the assigned value of pval = 1 is never read Colin > > regards, > dan carpenter >
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:25:06PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:08:44AM +0100, Colin King wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > > > Variable pval is being assigned a value that is never read. The > > assignment is redundant and hence can be removed. > > > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > --- > > drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > > index 6f5840a1a82d..53970d4ba695 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c > > @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm, > > if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) { > > /* First, test without any prescaler when available */ > > prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK; > > - pval = 1; > > /* > > * When not using any prescaler, the clock period in nanoseconds > > * is not an integer so round it half up instead of > > Are you sure? It looks used to me. Ah. Never mind. My tree was out of date. regards, dan carpenter
On 02/10/2019 14:29, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 04:25:06PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 11:08:44AM +0100, Colin King wrote: >>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >>> >>> Variable pval is being assigned a value that is never read. The >>> assignment is redundant and hence can be removed. >>> >>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value") >>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c | 1 - >>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c >>> index 6f5840a1a82d..53970d4ba695 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c >>> @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm, >>> if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) { >>> /* First, test without any prescaler when available */ >>> prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK; >>> - pval = 1; >>> /* >>> * When not using any prescaler, the clock period in nanoseconds >>> * is not an integer so round it half up instead of >> >> Are you sure? It looks used to me. > > Ah. Never mind. My tree was out of date. No problem. I appreciated you eyeballing my fixes. > > regards, > dan carpenter >
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c index 6f5840a1a82d..53970d4ba695 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sun4i.c @@ -156,7 +156,6 @@ static int sun4i_pwm_calculate(struct sun4i_pwm_chip *sun4i_pwm, if (sun4i_pwm->data->has_prescaler_bypass) { /* First, test without any prescaler when available */ prescaler = PWM_PRESCAL_MASK; - pval = 1; /* * When not using any prescaler, the clock period in nanoseconds * is not an integer so round it half up instead of