Message ID | 32ef0122a55bfbdbde0595b2aad930d83b27dd6d.1570663470.git.jonathantanmy@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Better threaded delta resolution in index-pack | expand |
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 04:44:17PM -0700, Jonathan Tan wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> > --- > builtin/index-pack.c | 10 +--------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c > index a23454da6e..1a2600d4b3 100644 > --- a/builtin/index-pack.c > +++ b/builtin/index-pack.c > @@ -1210,15 +1210,7 @@ static void resolve_deltas(void) > cleanup_thread(); > return; > } > - > - for (i = 0; i < nr_objects; i++) { > - struct object_entry *obj = &objects[i]; > - > - if (is_delta_type(obj->type)) > - continue; > - resolve_base(obj); > - display_progress(progress, nr_resolved_deltas); > - } > + threaded_second_pass(¬hread_data); > } I wondered at first if this would be a problem with NO_PTHREADS. But I think since the cleanups around 2094c5e582 (index-pack: remove #ifdef NO_PTHREADS, 2018-11-03), we always define threaded_second_pass(), even if all the locks are noops and we only ever have one thread. -Peff
diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c index a23454da6e..1a2600d4b3 100644 --- a/builtin/index-pack.c +++ b/builtin/index-pack.c @@ -1210,15 +1210,7 @@ static void resolve_deltas(void) cleanup_thread(); return; } - - for (i = 0; i < nr_objects; i++) { - struct object_entry *obj = &objects[i]; - - if (is_delta_type(obj->type)) - continue; - resolve_base(obj); - display_progress(progress, nr_resolved_deltas); - } + threaded_second_pass(¬hread_data); } /*
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> --- builtin/index-pack.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)