| Message ID | 1312897232-4792-10-git-send-email-manjugk@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
Hi Manju, On 8/9/2011 4:10 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > > The omap dt requires new omap hwmod api to be added for in order > to support omap dt. Both the subject and the changelog are misleading. You are not doing any hwmod stuff in it. You are just passing an "of_node" pointer during omap_device_build_ss. The subject should start with OMAP: omap_device: because it does not belong to the DT subsystem. The same comment apply to most patches in that series. > The new api is added and new parameter "np" is added for existing > api. I don't think np is not a super meaningful name. Some more explanation are needed as well. > The users of hwmod api is changed accrodingly. omap_device API + typo. > Build and boot tested on omap3 beagle for both dt and not dt build. > > Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah<manjugk@ti.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h | 11 +++++- > arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > index 458f7be..d7ff1ae 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int __init omap4_l3_init(void) > pr_err("could not look up %s\n", oh_name); > } > > - pdev = omap_device_build_ss("omap_l3_noc", 0, oh, 3, NULL, > + pdev = omap_device_build_ss(NULL, "omap_l3_noc", 0, oh, 3, NULL, > 0, NULL, 0, 0); OK, maybe that is just me, but in order to extend an API, I'd rather add the new parameter at the end. > WARN(IS_ERR(pdev), "could not build omap_device for %s\n", oh_name); > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > index 7a42f32..98eb95d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int omap_init_mcbsp(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused) > (struct omap_mcbsp_dev_attr *)(oh->dev_attr))->sidetone); > count++; > } > - pdev = omap_device_build_ss(name, id, oh_device, count, pdata, > + pdev = omap_device_build_ss(NULL, name, id, oh_device, count, pdata, > sizeof(*pdata), omap2_mcbsp_latency, > ARRAY_SIZE(omap2_mcbsp_latency), false); > kfree(pdata); > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > index 7a3ec4f..5e2424b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ > > #include<linux/kernel.h> > #include<linux/platform_device.h> > +#include<linux/of.h> > > #include<plat/omap_hwmod.h> > > @@ -89,12 +90,20 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); > > -struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(struct device_node *np, > + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > struct omap_hwmod **oh, int oh_cnt, > void *pdata, int pdata_len, > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); > > +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_dt(struct device_node *np, > + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > + struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, > + int pdata_len, > + struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > + int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); > + > void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct omap_device *od); > > /* OMAP PM interface */ > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c > index 7d5e76b..fa49168 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ > #include<linux/clk.h> > #include<linux/clkdev.h> > #include<linux/pm_runtime.h> > +#include<linux/of_device.h> > > #include<plat/omap_device.h> > #include<plat/omap_hwmod.h> > @@ -377,6 +378,7 @@ static int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, > /** > * omap_device_build - build and register an omap_device with one omap_hwmod Need to update the kerneldoc. > * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use > + * @np: device node pointer for attaching it to of_node pointer > * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID > * @oh: ptr to the single omap_hwmod that backs this omap_device > * @pdata: platform_data ptr to associate with the platform_device > @@ -391,7 +393,8 @@ static int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, > * information. Returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) if @oh is NULL; otherwise, > * passes along the return value of omap_device_build_ss(). > */ > -struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_dt(struct device_node *np, > + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, > int pdata_len, > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, That function should not be needed. You have to export omap_device_build_ss, otherwise you will not build any device with multiple hwmods. > @@ -402,12 +405,44 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > if (!oh) > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > - return omap_device_build_ss(pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, > + return omap_device_build_ss(np, pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, > pdata_len, pm_lats, pm_lats_cnt, > is_early_device); > } > > /** > + * omap_device_build - build and register an omap_device with one omap_hwmod > + * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use > + * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID > + * @oh: ptr to the single omap_hwmod that backs this omap_device > + * @pdata: platform_data ptr to associate with the platform_device > + * @pdata_len: amount of memory pointed to by @pdata > + * @pm_lats: pointer to a omap_device_pm_latency array for this device > + * @pm_lats_cnt: ARRAY_SIZE() of @pm_lats > + * @is_early_device: should the device be registered as an early device or not > + * > + * Convenience function for building and registering a single > + * omap_device record, which in turn builds and registers a > + * platform_device record. See omap_device_build_ss() for more > + * information. Returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) if @oh is NULL; otherwise, > + * passes along the return value of omap_device_build_ss(). > + */ > +struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > + struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, > + int pdata_len, > + struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > + int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device) > +{ > + struct omap_hwmod *ohs[] = { oh }; > + > + if (!oh) > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > + > + return omap_device_build_ss(NULL, pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, > + pdata_len, pm_lats, pm_lats_cnt, is_early_device); > +} > + > +/** > * omap_device_build_ss - build and register an omap_device with multiple hwmods > * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use > * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID > @@ -424,7 +459,8 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > * platform_device record. Returns an ERR_PTR() on error, or passes > * along the return value of omap_device_register(). > */ > -struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(struct device_node *np, > + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > struct omap_hwmod **ohs, int oh_cnt, > void *pdata, int pdata_len, > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > @@ -436,6 +472,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > struct resource *res = NULL; > int i, res_count; > struct omap_hwmod **hwmods; > + struct platform_device *pdev; > > if (!ohs || oh_cnt == 0 || !pdev_name) > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > @@ -450,6 +487,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > if (!od) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > + pdev =&od->pdev; Why do you need that? You are just adding one more user of the pdev. > od->hwmods_cnt = oh_cnt; > > hwmods = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_hwmod *) * oh_cnt, > @@ -465,8 +503,11 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > goto odbs_exit2; > strcpy(pdev_name2, pdev_name); > > - od->pdev.name = pdev_name2; > - od->pdev.id = pdev_id; > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE > + pdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(np); > +#endif > + pdev->name = pdev_name2; > + pdev->id = pdev_id; > > res_count = omap_device_count_resources(od); > if (res_count> 0) { > @@ -499,7 +540,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > if (ret) > goto odbs_exit4; > > - return&od->pdev; > + return pdev; > > odbs_exit4: > kfree(res); Regards, Benoit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > Hi Manju, > > On 8/9/2011 4:10 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > > > >The omap dt requires new omap hwmod api to be added for in order > >to support omap dt. > > Both the subject and the changelog are misleading. You are not doing > any hwmod stuff in it. > You are just passing an "of_node" pointer during omap_device_build_ss. > > The subject should start with OMAP: omap_device: because it does not > belong to the DT subsystem. > The same comment apply to most patches in that series. The goal of this patch is to make omap-hwmod ready for dt adaptation hence I used the title "dt: omap: prepare hwmod to support dt" and "of_node" pointer is passed from dt and it is required for dt build. And as you mentioned, patch does not do anything related to omap_device. > > >The new api is added and new parameter "np" is added for existing > >api. > > I don't think np is not a super meaningful name. Some more > explanation are needed as well. ok. I can expand it. > > >The users of hwmod api is changed accrodingly. > > omap_device API + typo. > > >Build and boot tested on omap3 beagle for both dt and not dt build. > > > >Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah<manjugk@ti.com> > >--- > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h | 11 +++++- > > arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > >index 458f7be..d7ff1ae 100644 > >--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > >@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int __init omap4_l3_init(void) > > pr_err("could not look up %s\n", oh_name); > > } > > > >- pdev = omap_device_build_ss("omap_l3_noc", 0, oh, 3, NULL, > >+ pdev = omap_device_build_ss(NULL, "omap_l3_noc", 0, oh, 3, NULL, > > 0, NULL, 0, 0); > > OK, maybe that is just me, but in order to extend an API, I'd rather > add the new parameter at the end. I feel it's fine since node pointer is first parameter is all dt api's. > > > WARN(IS_ERR(pdev), "could not build omap_device for %s\n", oh_name); > >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > >index 7a42f32..98eb95d 100644 > >--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > >@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int omap_init_mcbsp(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused) > > (struct omap_mcbsp_dev_attr *)(oh->dev_attr))->sidetone); > > count++; > > } > >- pdev = omap_device_build_ss(name, id, oh_device, count, pdata, > >+ pdev = omap_device_build_ss(NULL, name, id, oh_device, count, pdata, > > sizeof(*pdata), omap2_mcbsp_latency, > > ARRAY_SIZE(omap2_mcbsp_latency), false); > > kfree(pdata); > >diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > >index 7a3ec4f..5e2424b 100644 > >--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > >+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > >@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ > > > > #include<linux/kernel.h> > > #include<linux/platform_device.h> > >+#include<linux/of.h> > > > > #include<plat/omap_hwmod.h> > > > >@@ -89,12 +90,20 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > > int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); > > > >-struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > >+struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(struct device_node *np, > >+ const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > struct omap_hwmod **oh, int oh_cnt, > > void *pdata, int pdata_len, > > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > > int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); > > > >+struct platform_device *omap_device_build_dt(struct device_node *np, > >+ const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > >+ struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, > >+ int pdata_len, > >+ struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > >+ int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); > >+ > > void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct omap_device *od); > > > > /* OMAP PM interface */ > >diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c > >index 7d5e76b..fa49168 100644 > >--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c > >+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c > >@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ > > #include<linux/clk.h> > > #include<linux/clkdev.h> > > #include<linux/pm_runtime.h> > >+#include<linux/of_device.h> > > > > #include<plat/omap_device.h> > > #include<plat/omap_hwmod.h> > >@@ -377,6 +378,7 @@ static int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, > > /** > > * omap_device_build - build and register an omap_device with one omap_hwmod > > Need to update the kerneldoc. ok. > > > * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use > >+ * @np: device node pointer for attaching it to of_node pointer > > * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID > > * @oh: ptr to the single omap_hwmod that backs this omap_device > > * @pdata: platform_data ptr to associate with the platform_device > >@@ -391,7 +393,8 @@ static int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, > > * information. Returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) if @oh is NULL; otherwise, > > * passes along the return value of omap_device_build_ss(). > > */ > >-struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > >+struct platform_device *omap_device_build_dt(struct device_node *np, > >+ const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, > > int pdata_len, > > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > > That function should not be needed. You have to export > omap_device_build_ss, otherwise you will not build any device with > multiple hwmods. ok. > > >@@ -402,12 +405,44 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > if (!oh) > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > > > >- return omap_device_build_ss(pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, > >+ return omap_device_build_ss(np, pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, > > pdata_len, pm_lats, pm_lats_cnt, > > is_early_device); > > } > > > > /** > >+ * omap_device_build - build and register an omap_device with one omap_hwmod > >+ * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use > >+ * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID > >+ * @oh: ptr to the single omap_hwmod that backs this omap_device > >+ * @pdata: platform_data ptr to associate with the platform_device > >+ * @pdata_len: amount of memory pointed to by @pdata > >+ * @pm_lats: pointer to a omap_device_pm_latency array for this device > >+ * @pm_lats_cnt: ARRAY_SIZE() of @pm_lats > >+ * @is_early_device: should the device be registered as an early device or not > >+ * > >+ * Convenience function for building and registering a single > >+ * omap_device record, which in turn builds and registers a > >+ * platform_device record. See omap_device_build_ss() for more > >+ * information. Returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) if @oh is NULL; otherwise, > >+ * passes along the return value of omap_device_build_ss(). > >+ */ > >+struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > >+ struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, > >+ int pdata_len, > >+ struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > >+ int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device) > >+{ > >+ struct omap_hwmod *ohs[] = { oh }; > >+ > >+ if (!oh) > >+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > >+ > >+ return omap_device_build_ss(NULL, pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, > >+ pdata_len, pm_lats, pm_lats_cnt, is_early_device); > >+} > >+ > >+/** > > * omap_device_build_ss - build and register an omap_device with multiple hwmods > > * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use > > * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID > >@@ -424,7 +459,8 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > * platform_device record. Returns an ERR_PTR() on error, or passes > > * along the return value of omap_device_register(). > > */ > >-struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > >+struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(struct device_node *np, > >+ const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > struct omap_hwmod **ohs, int oh_cnt, > > void *pdata, int pdata_len, > > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > >@@ -436,6 +472,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > struct resource *res = NULL; > > int i, res_count; > > struct omap_hwmod **hwmods; > >+ struct platform_device *pdev; > > > > if (!ohs || oh_cnt == 0 || !pdev_name) > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > >@@ -450,6 +487,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > if (!od) > > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > > >+ pdev =&od->pdev; > > Why do you need that? You are just adding one more user of the pdev. just improve readability otherwise we need to have &od->pdev at multiple places below. > > > od->hwmods_cnt = oh_cnt; > > > > hwmods = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_hwmod *) * oh_cnt, > >@@ -465,8 +503,11 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > goto odbs_exit2; > > strcpy(pdev_name2, pdev_name); > > > >- od->pdev.name = pdev_name2; > >- od->pdev.id = pdev_id; > >+#ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE > >+ pdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(np); > >+#endif > >+ pdev->name = pdev_name2; > >+ pdev->id = pdev_id; > > > > res_count = omap_device_count_resources(od); > > if (res_count> 0) { > >@@ -499,7 +540,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > if (ret) > > goto odbs_exit4; > > > >- return&od->pdev; > >+ return pdev; > > > > odbs_exit4: > > kfree(res); > > Regards, > Benoit > > > _______________________________________________ > devicetree-discuss mailing list > devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 8/10/2011 6:28 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >> Hi Manju, >> >> On 8/9/2011 4:10 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: >>> >>> The omap dt requires new omap hwmod api to be added for in order >>> to support omap dt. >> >> Both the subject and the changelog are misleading. You are not doing >> any hwmod stuff in it. >> You are just passing an "of_node" pointer during omap_device_build_ss. >> >> The subject should start with OMAP: omap_device: because it does not >> belong to the DT subsystem. >> The same comment apply to most patches in that series. > > The goal of this patch is to make omap-hwmod ready for dt adaptation hence > I used the title "dt: omap: prepare hwmod to support dt" and "of_node" pointer > is passed from dt and it is required for dt build. I think that the goal of this patch is to update the omap_device_build_ss API in order to provide a device tree node pointer to pdev. For the moment there is nothing related to hwmod. > And as you mentioned, patch does not do anything related to omap_device. You meant omap_hwmod? Benoit >>> The new api is added and new parameter "np" is added for existing >>> api. >> >> I don't think np is not a super meaningful name. Some more >> explanation are needed as well. > > ok. I can expand it. > >> >>> The users of hwmod api is changed accrodingly. >> >> omap_device API + typo. >> >>> Build and boot tested on omap3 beagle for both dt and not dt build. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah<manjugk@ti.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h | 11 +++++- >>> arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- >>> 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c >>> index 458f7be..d7ff1ae 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c >>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int __init omap4_l3_init(void) >>> pr_err("could not look up %s\n", oh_name); >>> } >>> >>> - pdev = omap_device_build_ss("omap_l3_noc", 0, oh, 3, NULL, >>> + pdev = omap_device_build_ss(NULL, "omap_l3_noc", 0, oh, 3, NULL, >>> 0, NULL, 0, 0); >> >> OK, maybe that is just me, but in order to extend an API, I'd rather >> add the new parameter at the end. > > I feel it's fine since node pointer is first parameter is all dt api's. > >> >>> WARN(IS_ERR(pdev), "could not build omap_device for %s\n", oh_name); >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c >>> index 7a42f32..98eb95d 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c >>> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int omap_init_mcbsp(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused) >>> (struct omap_mcbsp_dev_attr *)(oh->dev_attr))->sidetone); >>> count++; >>> } >>> - pdev = omap_device_build_ss(name, id, oh_device, count, pdata, >>> + pdev = omap_device_build_ss(NULL, name, id, oh_device, count, pdata, >>> sizeof(*pdata), omap2_mcbsp_latency, >>> ARRAY_SIZE(omap2_mcbsp_latency), false); >>> kfree(pdata); >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h >>> index 7a3ec4f..5e2424b 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h >>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h >>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ >>> >>> #include<linux/kernel.h> >>> #include<linux/platform_device.h> >>> +#include<linux/of.h> >>> >>> #include<plat/omap_hwmod.h> >>> >>> @@ -89,12 +90,20 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, >>> int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); >>> >>> -struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(struct device_node *np, >>> + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> struct omap_hwmod **oh, int oh_cnt, >>> void *pdata, int pdata_len, >>> struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, >>> int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); >>> >>> +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_dt(struct device_node *np, >>> + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> + struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, >>> + int pdata_len, >>> + struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, >>> + int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); >>> + >>> void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct omap_device *od); >>> >>> /* OMAP PM interface */ >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c >>> index 7d5e76b..fa49168 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c >>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ >>> #include<linux/clk.h> >>> #include<linux/clkdev.h> >>> #include<linux/pm_runtime.h> >>> +#include<linux/of_device.h> >>> >>> #include<plat/omap_device.h> >>> #include<plat/omap_hwmod.h> >>> @@ -377,6 +378,7 @@ static int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, >>> /** >>> * omap_device_build - build and register an omap_device with one omap_hwmod >> >> Need to update the kerneldoc. > ok. >> >>> * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use >>> + * @np: device node pointer for attaching it to of_node pointer >>> * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID >>> * @oh: ptr to the single omap_hwmod that backs this omap_device >>> * @pdata: platform_data ptr to associate with the platform_device >>> @@ -391,7 +393,8 @@ static int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, >>> * information. Returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) if @oh is NULL; otherwise, >>> * passes along the return value of omap_device_build_ss(). >>> */ >>> -struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_dt(struct device_node *np, >>> + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, >>> int pdata_len, >>> struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, >> >> That function should not be needed. You have to export >> omap_device_build_ss, otherwise you will not build any device with >> multiple hwmods. > ok. >> >>> @@ -402,12 +405,44 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> if (!oh) >>> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> >>> - return omap_device_build_ss(pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, >>> + return omap_device_build_ss(np, pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, >>> pdata_len, pm_lats, pm_lats_cnt, >>> is_early_device); >>> } >>> >>> /** >>> + * omap_device_build - build and register an omap_device with one omap_hwmod >>> + * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use >>> + * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID >>> + * @oh: ptr to the single omap_hwmod that backs this omap_device >>> + * @pdata: platform_data ptr to associate with the platform_device >>> + * @pdata_len: amount of memory pointed to by @pdata >>> + * @pm_lats: pointer to a omap_device_pm_latency array for this device >>> + * @pm_lats_cnt: ARRAY_SIZE() of @pm_lats >>> + * @is_early_device: should the device be registered as an early device or not >>> + * >>> + * Convenience function for building and registering a single >>> + * omap_device record, which in turn builds and registers a >>> + * platform_device record. See omap_device_build_ss() for more >>> + * information. Returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) if @oh is NULL; otherwise, >>> + * passes along the return value of omap_device_build_ss(). >>> + */ >>> +struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> + struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, >>> + int pdata_len, >>> + struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, >>> + int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device) >>> +{ >>> + struct omap_hwmod *ohs[] = { oh }; >>> + >>> + if (!oh) >>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> + >>> + return omap_device_build_ss(NULL, pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, >>> + pdata_len, pm_lats, pm_lats_cnt, is_early_device); >>> +} >>> + >>> +/** >>> * omap_device_build_ss - build and register an omap_device with multiple hwmods >>> * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use >>> * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID >>> @@ -424,7 +459,8 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> * platform_device record. Returns an ERR_PTR() on error, or passes >>> * along the return value of omap_device_register(). >>> */ >>> -struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(struct device_node *np, >>> + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> struct omap_hwmod **ohs, int oh_cnt, >>> void *pdata, int pdata_len, >>> struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, >>> @@ -436,6 +472,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> struct resource *res = NULL; >>> int i, res_count; >>> struct omap_hwmod **hwmods; >>> + struct platform_device *pdev; >>> >>> if (!ohs || oh_cnt == 0 || !pdev_name) >>> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> @@ -450,6 +487,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> if (!od) >>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >>> >>> + pdev =&od->pdev; >> >> Why do you need that? You are just adding one more user of the pdev. > > just improve readability otherwise we need to have&od->pdev at multiple places > below. > >> >>> od->hwmods_cnt = oh_cnt; >>> >>> hwmods = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_hwmod *) * oh_cnt, >>> @@ -465,8 +503,11 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> goto odbs_exit2; >>> strcpy(pdev_name2, pdev_name); >>> >>> - od->pdev.name = pdev_name2; >>> - od->pdev.id = pdev_id; >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE >>> + pdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(np); >>> +#endif >>> + pdev->name = pdev_name2; >>> + pdev->id = pdev_id; >>> >>> res_count = omap_device_count_resources(od); >>> if (res_count> 0) { >>> @@ -499,7 +540,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, >>> if (ret) >>> goto odbs_exit4; >>> >>> - return&od->pdev; >>> + return pdev; >>> >>> odbs_exit4: >>> kfree(res); >> >> Regards, >> Benoit >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devicetree-discuss mailing list >> devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org >> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com> wrote: > On 8/10/2011 6:28 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >>> >>> Hi Manju, >>> >>> On 8/9/2011 4:10 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: >>>> >>>> The omap dt requires new omap hwmod api to be added for in order >>>> to support omap dt. >>> >>> Both the subject and the changelog are misleading. You are not doing >>> any hwmod stuff in it. >>> You are just passing an "of_node" pointer during omap_device_build_ss. >>> >>> The subject should start with OMAP: omap_device: because it does not >>> belong to the DT subsystem. >>> The same comment apply to most patches in that series. >> >> The goal of this patch is to make omap-hwmod ready for dt adaptation hence >> I used the title "dt: omap: prepare hwmod to support dt" and "of_node" >> pointer >> is passed from dt and it is required for dt build. > > I think that the goal of this patch is to update the omap_device_build_ss > API in order to provide a device tree node pointer to pdev. For the moment > there is nothing related to hwmod. yes. it is to update *_ss api with device node pointer and introduce new api exported for dt builds. I can update with this description. > >> And as you mentioned, patch does not do anything related to omap_device. > > You meant omap_hwmod? Yes. It should be "omap: omap_hwmod: add device node pointer" -M -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 8/10/2011 8:03 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@ti.com> wrote: >> On 8/10/2011 6:28 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Manju, >>>> >>>> On 8/9/2011 4:10 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The omap dt requires new omap hwmod api to be added for in order >>>>> to support omap dt. >>>> >>>> Both the subject and the changelog are misleading. You are not doing >>>> any hwmod stuff in it. >>>> You are just passing an "of_node" pointer during omap_device_build_ss. >>>> >>>> The subject should start with OMAP: omap_device: because it does not >>>> belong to the DT subsystem. >>>> The same comment apply to most patches in that series. >>> >>> The goal of this patch is to make omap-hwmod ready for dt adaptation hence >>> I used the title "dt: omap: prepare hwmod to support dt" and "of_node" >>> pointer >>> is passed from dt and it is required for dt build. >> >> I think that the goal of this patch is to update the omap_device_build_ss >> API in order to provide a device tree node pointer to pdev. For the moment >> there is nothing related to hwmod. > yes. it is to update *_ss api with device node pointer and introduce new > api exported for dt builds. I can update with this description. >> >>> And as you mentioned, patch does not do anything related to omap_device. >> >> You meant omap_hwmod? > > Yes. It should be "omap: omap_hwmod: add device node pointer" ... "OMAP: omap_device: Add device tree node pointer" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:58:46PM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0200, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > > Hi Manju, > > > > On 8/9/2011 4:10 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > > > > > >The omap dt requires new omap hwmod api to be added for in order > > >to support omap dt. > > > > Both the subject and the changelog are misleading. You are not doing > > any hwmod stuff in it. > > You are just passing an "of_node" pointer during omap_device_build_ss. > > > > The subject should start with OMAP: omap_device: because it does not > > belong to the DT subsystem. > > The same comment apply to most patches in that series. > > The goal of this patch is to make omap-hwmod ready for dt adaptation hence > I used the title "dt: omap: prepare hwmod to support dt" and "of_node" pointer > is passed from dt and it is required for dt build. > > And as you mentioned, patch does not do anything related to omap_device. > > > > > >The new api is added and new parameter "np" is added for existing > > >api. > > > > I don't think np is not a super meaningful name. Some more > > explanation are needed as well. > > ok. I can expand it. > > > > > >The users of hwmod api is changed accrodingly. > > > > omap_device API + typo. > > > > >Build and boot tested on omap3 beagle for both dt and not dt build. > > > > > >Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah<manjugk@ti.com> > > >--- > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 2 +- > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c | 2 +- > > > arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h | 11 +++++- > > > arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > > 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > > > > >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > > >index 458f7be..d7ff1ae 100644 > > >--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > > >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c > > >@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int __init omap4_l3_init(void) > > > pr_err("could not look up %s\n", oh_name); > > > } > > > > > >- pdev = omap_device_build_ss("omap_l3_noc", 0, oh, 3, NULL, > > >+ pdev = omap_device_build_ss(NULL, "omap_l3_noc", 0, oh, 3, NULL, > > > 0, NULL, 0, 0); > > > > OK, maybe that is just me, but in order to extend an API, I'd rather > > add the new parameter at the end. > > I feel it's fine since node pointer is first parameter is all dt api's. > > > > > > WARN(IS_ERR(pdev), "could not build omap_device for %s\n", oh_name); > > >diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > > >index 7a42f32..98eb95d 100644 > > >--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > > >+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c > > >@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int omap_init_mcbsp(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused) > > > (struct omap_mcbsp_dev_attr *)(oh->dev_attr))->sidetone); > > > count++; > > > } > > >- pdev = omap_device_build_ss(name, id, oh_device, count, pdata, > > >+ pdev = omap_device_build_ss(NULL, name, id, oh_device, count, pdata, > > > sizeof(*pdata), omap2_mcbsp_latency, > > > ARRAY_SIZE(omap2_mcbsp_latency), false); > > > kfree(pdata); > > >diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > > >index 7a3ec4f..5e2424b 100644 > > >--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > > >+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h > > >@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ > > > > > > #include<linux/kernel.h> > > > #include<linux/platform_device.h> > > >+#include<linux/of.h> > > > > > > #include<plat/omap_hwmod.h> > > > > > >@@ -89,12 +90,20 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > > > int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); > > > > > >-struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > >+struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(struct device_node *np, > > >+ const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > > struct omap_hwmod **oh, int oh_cnt, > > > void *pdata, int pdata_len, > > > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > > > int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); > > > > > >+struct platform_device *omap_device_build_dt(struct device_node *np, > > >+ const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > >+ struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, > > >+ int pdata_len, > > >+ struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > > >+ int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); > > >+ > > > void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct omap_device *od); > > > > > > /* OMAP PM interface */ > > >diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c > > >index 7d5e76b..fa49168 100644 > > >--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c > > >+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c > > >@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ > > > #include<linux/clk.h> > > > #include<linux/clkdev.h> > > > #include<linux/pm_runtime.h> > > >+#include<linux/of_device.h> > > > > > > #include<plat/omap_device.h> > > > #include<plat/omap_hwmod.h> > > >@@ -377,6 +378,7 @@ static int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, > > > /** > > > * omap_device_build - build and register an omap_device with one omap_hwmod > > > > Need to update the kerneldoc. > ok. As these API's are interim API's and we might have alternate setup to handle hwmod in the coming days, the documentation part will be taken care along with final solution for hwmod issue. > > > > > * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use > > >+ * @np: device node pointer for attaching it to of_node pointer > > > * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID > > > * @oh: ptr to the single omap_hwmod that backs this omap_device > > > * @pdata: platform_data ptr to associate with the platform_device > > >@@ -391,7 +393,8 @@ static int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, > > > * information. Returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) if @oh is NULL; otherwise, > > > * passes along the return value of omap_device_build_ss(). > > > */ > > >-struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > >+struct platform_device *omap_device_build_dt(struct device_node *np, > > >+ const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, > > > struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, > > > int pdata_len, > > > struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, > > > > That function should not be needed. You have to export > > omap_device_build_ss, otherwise you will not build any device with > > multiple hwmods. > ok. confused here. All the three API's *_dt/*_ss/*_dt are exported and can be accessed for single or multiple hwmods. Am I missing anything? -M -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c index 458f7be..d7ff1ae 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int __init omap4_l3_init(void) pr_err("could not look up %s\n", oh_name); } - pdev = omap_device_build_ss("omap_l3_noc", 0, oh, 3, NULL, + pdev = omap_device_build_ss(NULL, "omap_l3_noc", 0, oh, 3, NULL, 0, NULL, 0, 0); WARN(IS_ERR(pdev), "could not build omap_device for %s\n", oh_name); diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c index 7a42f32..98eb95d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int omap_init_mcbsp(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused) (struct omap_mcbsp_dev_attr *)(oh->dev_attr))->sidetone); count++; } - pdev = omap_device_build_ss(name, id, oh_device, count, pdata, + pdev = omap_device_build_ss(NULL, name, id, oh_device, count, pdata, sizeof(*pdata), omap2_mcbsp_latency, ARRAY_SIZE(omap2_mcbsp_latency), false); kfree(pdata); diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h index 7a3ec4f..5e2424b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/of.h> #include <plat/omap_hwmod.h> @@ -89,12 +90,20 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); -struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(struct device_node *np, + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, struct omap_hwmod **oh, int oh_cnt, void *pdata, int pdata_len, struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_dt(struct device_node *np, + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, + struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, + int pdata_len, + struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, + int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device); + void __iomem *omap_device_get_rt_va(struct omap_device *od); /* OMAP PM interface */ diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c index 7d5e76b..fa49168 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/clkdev.h> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> +#include <linux/of_device.h> #include <plat/omap_device.h> #include <plat/omap_hwmod.h> @@ -377,6 +378,7 @@ static int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, /** * omap_device_build - build and register an omap_device with one omap_hwmod * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use + * @np: device node pointer for attaching it to of_node pointer * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID * @oh: ptr to the single omap_hwmod that backs this omap_device * @pdata: platform_data ptr to associate with the platform_device @@ -391,7 +393,8 @@ static int omap_device_fill_resources(struct omap_device *od, * information. Returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) if @oh is NULL; otherwise, * passes along the return value of omap_device_build_ss(). */ -struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_dt(struct device_node *np, + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, int pdata_len, struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, @@ -402,12 +405,44 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, if (!oh) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - return omap_device_build_ss(pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, + return omap_device_build_ss(np, pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, pdata_len, pm_lats, pm_lats_cnt, is_early_device); } /** + * omap_device_build - build and register an omap_device with one omap_hwmod + * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use + * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID + * @oh: ptr to the single omap_hwmod that backs this omap_device + * @pdata: platform_data ptr to associate with the platform_device + * @pdata_len: amount of memory pointed to by @pdata + * @pm_lats: pointer to a omap_device_pm_latency array for this device + * @pm_lats_cnt: ARRAY_SIZE() of @pm_lats + * @is_early_device: should the device be registered as an early device or not + * + * Convenience function for building and registering a single + * omap_device record, which in turn builds and registers a + * platform_device record. See omap_device_build_ss() for more + * information. Returns ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) if @oh is NULL; otherwise, + * passes along the return value of omap_device_build_ss(). + */ +struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, + struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *pdata, + int pdata_len, + struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, + int pm_lats_cnt, int is_early_device) +{ + struct omap_hwmod *ohs[] = { oh }; + + if (!oh) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + return omap_device_build_ss(NULL, pdev_name, pdev_id, ohs, 1, pdata, + pdata_len, pm_lats, pm_lats_cnt, is_early_device); +} + +/** * omap_device_build_ss - build and register an omap_device with multiple hwmods * @pdev_name: name of the platform_device driver to use * @pdev_id: this platform_device's connection ID @@ -424,7 +459,8 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, * platform_device record. Returns an ERR_PTR() on error, or passes * along the return value of omap_device_register(). */ -struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, +struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(struct device_node *np, + const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, struct omap_hwmod **ohs, int oh_cnt, void *pdata, int pdata_len, struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats, @@ -436,6 +472,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, struct resource *res = NULL; int i, res_count; struct omap_hwmod **hwmods; + struct platform_device *pdev; if (!ohs || oh_cnt == 0 || !pdev_name) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); @@ -450,6 +487,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, if (!od) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + pdev = &od->pdev; od->hwmods_cnt = oh_cnt; hwmods = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_hwmod *) * oh_cnt, @@ -465,8 +503,11 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, goto odbs_exit2; strcpy(pdev_name2, pdev_name); - od->pdev.name = pdev_name2; - od->pdev.id = pdev_id; +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_DEVICE + pdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(np); +#endif + pdev->name = pdev_name2; + pdev->id = pdev_id; res_count = omap_device_count_resources(od); if (res_count > 0) { @@ -499,7 +540,7 @@ struct platform_device *omap_device_build_ss(const char *pdev_name, int pdev_id, if (ret) goto odbs_exit4; - return &od->pdev; + return pdev; odbs_exit4: kfree(res);
The omap dt requires new omap hwmod api to be added for in order to support omap dt. The new api is added and new parameter "np" is added for existing api. The users of hwmod api is changed accrodingly. Build and boot tested on omap3 beagle for both dt and not dt build. Signed-off-by: G, Manjunath Kondaiah <manjugk@ti.com> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c | 2 +- arch/arm/mach-omap2/mcbsp.c | 2 +- arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h | 11 +++++- arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)