Message ID | 20191105235608.107702-1-samitolvanen@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | add support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack | expand |
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:55:54PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > This patch series adds support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack > (SCS) mitigation, which uses a separately allocated shadow stack > to protect against return address overwrites. More information Will, Catalin, Mark, What's the next step here? I *think* all the comments have been addressed. Is it possible to land this via the arm tree for v5.5? Thanks!
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:44:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:55:54PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > This patch series adds support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack > > (SCS) mitigation, which uses a separately allocated shadow stack > > to protect against return address overwrites. More information > > Will, Catalin, Mark, > > What's the next step here? I *think* all the comments have been > addressed. Is it possible to land this via the arm tree for v5.5? I was planning to queue this for 5.6, given that I'd really like it to spend some quality time in linux-next. Will
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:03:38PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:44:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:55:54PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > > This patch series adds support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack > > > (SCS) mitigation, which uses a separately allocated shadow stack > > > to protect against return address overwrites. More information > > > > Will, Catalin, Mark, > > > > What's the next step here? I *think* all the comments have been > > addressed. Is it possible to land this via the arm tree for v5.5? > > I was planning to queue this for 5.6, given that I'd really like it to > spend some quality time in linux-next. Sounds fine to me; I just wanted to have an idea what to expect. :) Thanks!
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:44:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:55:54PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > This patch series adds support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack > > (SCS) mitigation, which uses a separately allocated shadow stack > > to protect against return address overwrites. More information > > Will, Catalin, Mark, > > What's the next step here? I *think* all the comments have been > addressed. I'm hoping to look over the remaining bits in the next week or so, and to throw my test boxes at this shortly. Thanks, Mark.