Message ID | 20191203041440.6275-1-andrew@aj.id.au (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=Q03X=ZZ=nongnu.org=qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2549F109A for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 04:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC94C20665 for <patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 04:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=aj.id.au header.i=@aj.id.au header.b="W9Ga0kap"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="DOQ9gAUd" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EC94C20665 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=aj.id.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48206 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org>) id 1ibzaJ-00078l-W9 for patchwork-qemu-devel@patchwork.kernel.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:14:48 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <andrew@aj.id.au>) id 1ibzYy-0005by-BZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:13:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <andrew@aj.id.au>) id 1ibzYx-00018O-6R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:13:24 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:40661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <andrew@aj.id.au>) id 1ibzYs-00011e-TO; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:13:19 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CB25C3; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 23:13:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 23:13:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aj.id.au; h=from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=QNsQgXYGYrk1YAopBqhxivrkfW 0hwxhGi//jQO/OV+Y=; b=W9Ga0kapNxAUI7CfChi/1lwKgYjYSBTH0ke+a0x9mt W8EV/L/YRFjKWsHATsaL0VAO+9By4PIq+bfInCeLgxNjIYdtEb38mof0d08MhnNi VioBEZvDe4BPvbagcCJ40wK1H4p2ONK1TPkQds7HQbQMmnlKSUn7d7ZGblzabqas 3/vHWDoBGpuB/r9Ltva0ZhOkZuf/jLXqFm7zj/QQIaIlI2IHgGcdzsVOg1D1ip+6 EopWiRgdaNfmmOaamvoIxyljgn/DDTZGW0Yotb8QXbVrD+HrE0WAjcENPzE9XAXN AhN6g0IfHoMNkJc0o53WFZqiTc/lShloI88lTYNPRdhQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=QNsQgX YGYrk1YAopBqhxivrkfW0hwxhGi//jQO/OV+Y=; b=DOQ9gAUdeYVmcEArki+n0s ZJ1PpLNZ3CohTIiRNfNuJsk3SFbHoIpY+RsGoWdHbpEMRJp05XQot6Hhn9x96PaL lA2uYVD9zHD6g0FsEr1BomSNp7QIbE0/rZN6b/cKY6vorEkgp9zXwRepNEu2pFZh VTxDy3WY+dJGnMXPn5zDd/eUDzA0NxTs8SLnagcLY+MlO9NztWB5VP6Pv11zmXSm 2LAJUENoxAAnhBQn7yMOQoHe71VJe1gZzoyC+SQAh10FH8JUwAtd7IwpWbmx17E9 m06DcCn6US75U6AYUrp30Ab79//3gM74yiJvxc6InYX876ORQJYqpqfMMlzY3ZKw == X-ME-Sender: <xms:3ODlXWvJg59mVE4tmkfkfSVlsnd0ZbWUdkGIqfvJ5EOea4iD7__8LQ> X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudejiedgieeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkofggtgfgsehtkeertd ertdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetnhgurhgvficulfgvfhhfvghrhicuoegrnhgurhgvfiesrghj rdhiugdrrghuqeenucffohhmrghinhepohiilhgrsghsrdhorhhgnecukfhppedvtddvrd ekuddrudekrdeftdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghnughrvgifsegrjhdr ihgurdgruhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:3ODlXXkvldWrsRnehIqTvkR4sUQP-JB-6Rgt-eoqMPG6URPhhvNKfw> <xmx:3ODlXbAIDWi9ZYklof8qiOt-1xGOXnSlkx0GPceoOahMYL-zwA8-7A> <xmx:3ODlXQQ4fvm8PEb1BiCdIhDe5KynaWV__IDiEYuju7_EFp0FvDYFlw> <xmx:3eDlXfnvgVoD4cvUovxfGYf21M0WRT9Expj960Us3--SdHRObs_TDQ> Received: from mistburn.au.ibm.com (bh02i525f01.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.30]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1497B8005A; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 23:13:13 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> To: qemu-arm@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] Expose GT CNTFRQ as a CPU property to support AST2600 Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:44:36 +1030 Message-Id: <20191203041440.6275-1-andrew@aj.id.au> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.123.24 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel> List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>, <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.maydell@linaro.org, clg@kaod.org, joel@jms.id.au Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" <qemu-devel-bounces+patchwork-qemu-devel=patchwork.kernel.org@nongnu.org> |
Series |
Expose GT CNTFRQ as a CPU property to support AST2600
|
expand
|
On 12/3/19 5:14 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > Hello, > > This is a v2 of the belated follow-up from a few of my earlier attempts to fix > up the ARM generic timer for correct behaviour on the ASPEED AST2600 SoC. The > AST2600 clocks the generic timer at the rate of HPLL, which is configured to > 1125MHz. This is significantly quicker than the currently hard-coded generic > timer rate of 62.5MHz and so we see "sticky" behaviour in the guest. Glad you fixed this! I hit the same problem with the Raspi4.