Message ID | 20191128165002.6234-7-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | candidates for stable 4.19.y | expand |
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 09:49:51AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> > > commit 74457c40f97a98142bb13153395d304ad3c85cdd upstream > > With introduction of rproc_alloc_registered_carveouts() which > delays carveout allocation just before the start of the remote > processor, rproc_da_to_va() could be called before all carveouts > are allocated. > This patch adds a check in rproc_da_to_va() to return NULL if > carveout is not allocated. > > Fixes: d7c51706d095 ("remoteproc: add alloc ops in rproc_mem_entry struct") This commit only shows up in 4.20, not 4.19, so why is this patch relevant for 4.19? thanks, greg k-h
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 12:43, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 09:49:51AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > From: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> > > > > commit 74457c40f97a98142bb13153395d304ad3c85cdd upstream > > > > With introduction of rproc_alloc_registered_carveouts() which > > delays carveout allocation just before the start of the remote > > processor, rproc_da_to_va() could be called before all carveouts > > are allocated. > > This patch adds a check in rproc_da_to_va() to return NULL if > > carveout is not allocated. > > > > Fixes: d7c51706d095 ("remoteproc: add alloc ops in rproc_mem_entry struct") > > This commit only shows up in 4.20, not 4.19, so why is this patch > relevant for 4.19? Your scripts are better than mine... > > thanks, > > greg k-h
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c index aa6206706fe3..af9d443e7796 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c @@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ void *rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) list_for_each_entry(carveout, &rproc->carveouts, node) { int offset = da - carveout->da; + /* Verify that carveout is allocated */ + if (!carveout->va) + continue; + /* try next carveout if da is too small */ if (offset < 0) continue;