Message ID | 1574335427-3763-4-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | vfio_pci: wrap pci device as a mediated device | expand |
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:23:40 +0800 Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote: > This patch replaces the vfio_pci_driver reference in vfio_pci.c with > pci_dev_driver(vdev->pdev) which is more helpful to make the functions > be generic to module types. > > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> > Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> > --- > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > index b04e43a..2096e66 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > @@ -1460,24 +1460,25 @@ static void vfio_pci_reflck_get(struct vfio_pci_reflck *reflck) > > static int vfio_pci_reflck_find(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data) > { > - struct vfio_pci_reflck **preflck = data; > + struct vfio_pci_device *vdev = data; > + struct vfio_pci_reflck **preflck = &vdev->reflck; > struct vfio_device *device; > - struct vfio_pci_device *vdev; > + struct vfio_pci_device *tmp; > > device = vfio_device_get_from_dev(&pdev->dev); > if (!device) > return 0; > > - if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != &vfio_pci_driver) { > + if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != pci_dev_driver(vdev->pdev)) { > vfio_device_put(device); > return 0; > } > > - vdev = vfio_device_data(device); > + tmp = vfio_device_data(device); > > - if (vdev->reflck) { > - vfio_pci_reflck_get(vdev->reflck); > - *preflck = vdev->reflck; > + if (tmp->reflck) { > + vfio_pci_reflck_get(tmp->reflck); > + *preflck = tmp->reflck; > vfio_device_put(device); > return 1; > } > @@ -1494,7 +1495,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_reflck_attach(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) > > if (pci_is_root_bus(vdev->pdev->bus) || > vfio_pci_for_each_slot_or_bus(vdev->pdev, vfio_pci_reflck_find, > - &vdev->reflck, slot) <= 0) > + vdev, slot) <= 0) > vdev->reflck = vfio_pci_reflck_alloc(); > > mutex_unlock(&reflck_lock); > @@ -1519,6 +1520,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_reflck_put(struct vfio_pci_reflck *reflck) > > struct vfio_devices { > struct vfio_device **devices; > + struct vfio_pci_device *vdev; > int cur_index; > int max_index; > }; > @@ -1527,7 +1529,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_unused_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data) > { > struct vfio_devices *devs = data; > struct vfio_device *device; > - struct vfio_pci_device *vdev; > + struct vfio_pci_device *tmp; > > if (devs->cur_index == devs->max_index) > return -ENOSPC; > @@ -1536,15 +1538,15 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_unused_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data) > if (!device) > return -EINVAL; > > - if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != &vfio_pci_driver) { > + if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != pci_dev_driver(devs->vdev->pdev)) { > vfio_device_put(device); > return -EBUSY; > } > > - vdev = vfio_device_data(device); > + tmp = vfio_device_data(device); > > /* Fault if the device is not unused */ > - if (vdev->refcnt) { > + if (tmp->refcnt) { > vfio_device_put(device); > return -EBUSY; > } > @@ -1590,6 +1592,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_try_bus_reset(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) > if (!devs.devices) > return; > > + devs.vdev = vdev; This could be added to the declaration initializer: struct vfio_devices devs = { .vdev = vdev, .cur_index = 0 }; It might seem a little less random then. Thanks, Alex > if (vfio_pci_for_each_slot_or_bus(vdev->pdev, > vfio_pci_get_unused_devs, > &devs, slot)) > @@ -1634,7 +1637,7 @@ static void __exit vfio_pci_cleanup(void) > vfio_pci_uninit_perm_bits(); > } > > -static void __init vfio_pci_fill_ids(char *ids) > +static void __init vfio_pci_fill_ids(char *ids, struct pci_driver *driver) > { > char *p, *id; > int rc; > @@ -1662,7 +1665,7 @@ static void __init vfio_pci_fill_ids(char *ids) > continue; > } > > - rc = pci_add_dynid(&vfio_pci_driver, vendor, device, > + rc = pci_add_dynid(driver, vendor, device, > subvendor, subdevice, class, class_mask, 0); > if (rc) > pr_warn("failed to add dynamic id [%04x:%04x[%04x:%04x]] class %#08x/%08x (%d)\n", > @@ -1689,7 +1692,7 @@ static int __init vfio_pci_init(void) > if (ret) > goto out_driver; > > - vfio_pci_fill_ids(ids); > + vfio_pci_fill_ids(ids, &vfio_pci_driver); > > return 0; >
> From: Alex Williamson < alex.williamson@redhat.com> > Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 6:47 AM > To: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] vfio_pci: refine vfio_pci_driver reference in vfio_pci.c > > On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:23:40 +0800 > Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote: > > > This patch replaces the vfio_pci_driver reference in vfio_pci.c with > > pci_dev_driver(vdev->pdev) which is more helpful to make the functions > > be generic to module types. > > > > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> > > Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > > index b04e43a..2096e66 100644 > > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c > > @@ -1460,24 +1460,25 @@ static void vfio_pci_reflck_get(struct vfio_pci_reflck > *reflck) > > > > static int vfio_pci_reflck_find(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data) > > { > > - struct vfio_pci_reflck **preflck = data; > > + struct vfio_pci_device *vdev = data; > > + struct vfio_pci_reflck **preflck = &vdev->reflck; > > struct vfio_device *device; > > - struct vfio_pci_device *vdev; > > + struct vfio_pci_device *tmp; > > > > device = vfio_device_get_from_dev(&pdev->dev); > > if (!device) > > return 0; > > > > - if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != &vfio_pci_driver) { > > + if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != pci_dev_driver(vdev->pdev)) { > > vfio_device_put(device); > > return 0; > > } > > > > - vdev = vfio_device_data(device); > > + tmp = vfio_device_data(device); > > > > - if (vdev->reflck) { > > - vfio_pci_reflck_get(vdev->reflck); > > - *preflck = vdev->reflck; > > + if (tmp->reflck) { > > + vfio_pci_reflck_get(tmp->reflck); > > + *preflck = tmp->reflck; > > vfio_device_put(device); > > return 1; > > } > > @@ -1494,7 +1495,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_reflck_attach(struct vfio_pci_device > *vdev) > > > > if (pci_is_root_bus(vdev->pdev->bus) || > > vfio_pci_for_each_slot_or_bus(vdev->pdev, vfio_pci_reflck_find, > > - &vdev->reflck, slot) <= 0) > > + vdev, slot) <= 0) > > vdev->reflck = vfio_pci_reflck_alloc(); > > > > mutex_unlock(&reflck_lock); > > @@ -1519,6 +1520,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_reflck_put(struct vfio_pci_reflck > *reflck) > > > > struct vfio_devices { > > struct vfio_device **devices; > > + struct vfio_pci_device *vdev; > > int cur_index; > > int max_index; > > }; > > @@ -1527,7 +1529,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_unused_devs(struct pci_dev > *pdev, void *data) > > { > > struct vfio_devices *devs = data; > > struct vfio_device *device; > > - struct vfio_pci_device *vdev; > > + struct vfio_pci_device *tmp; > > > > if (devs->cur_index == devs->max_index) > > return -ENOSPC; > > @@ -1536,15 +1538,15 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_unused_devs(struct pci_dev > *pdev, void *data) > > if (!device) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != &vfio_pci_driver) { > > + if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != pci_dev_driver(devs->vdev->pdev)) { > > vfio_device_put(device); > > return -EBUSY; > > } > > > > - vdev = vfio_device_data(device); > > + tmp = vfio_device_data(device); > > > > /* Fault if the device is not unused */ > > - if (vdev->refcnt) { > > + if (tmp->refcnt) { > > vfio_device_put(device); > > return -EBUSY; > > } > > @@ -1590,6 +1592,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_try_bus_reset(struct vfio_pci_device > *vdev) > > if (!devs.devices) > > return; > > > > + devs.vdev = vdev; > > This could be added to the declaration initializer: > > struct vfio_devices devs = { .vdev = vdev, .cur_index = 0 }; > > It might seem a little less random then. Thanks, Got it. Will do it. Thanks, Yi Liu
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c index b04e43a..2096e66 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c @@ -1460,24 +1460,25 @@ static void vfio_pci_reflck_get(struct vfio_pci_reflck *reflck) static int vfio_pci_reflck_find(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data) { - struct vfio_pci_reflck **preflck = data; + struct vfio_pci_device *vdev = data; + struct vfio_pci_reflck **preflck = &vdev->reflck; struct vfio_device *device; - struct vfio_pci_device *vdev; + struct vfio_pci_device *tmp; device = vfio_device_get_from_dev(&pdev->dev); if (!device) return 0; - if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != &vfio_pci_driver) { + if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != pci_dev_driver(vdev->pdev)) { vfio_device_put(device); return 0; } - vdev = vfio_device_data(device); + tmp = vfio_device_data(device); - if (vdev->reflck) { - vfio_pci_reflck_get(vdev->reflck); - *preflck = vdev->reflck; + if (tmp->reflck) { + vfio_pci_reflck_get(tmp->reflck); + *preflck = tmp->reflck; vfio_device_put(device); return 1; } @@ -1494,7 +1495,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_reflck_attach(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) if (pci_is_root_bus(vdev->pdev->bus) || vfio_pci_for_each_slot_or_bus(vdev->pdev, vfio_pci_reflck_find, - &vdev->reflck, slot) <= 0) + vdev, slot) <= 0) vdev->reflck = vfio_pci_reflck_alloc(); mutex_unlock(&reflck_lock); @@ -1519,6 +1520,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_reflck_put(struct vfio_pci_reflck *reflck) struct vfio_devices { struct vfio_device **devices; + struct vfio_pci_device *vdev; int cur_index; int max_index; }; @@ -1527,7 +1529,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_unused_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data) { struct vfio_devices *devs = data; struct vfio_device *device; - struct vfio_pci_device *vdev; + struct vfio_pci_device *tmp; if (devs->cur_index == devs->max_index) return -ENOSPC; @@ -1536,15 +1538,15 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_unused_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev, void *data) if (!device) return -EINVAL; - if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != &vfio_pci_driver) { + if (pci_dev_driver(pdev) != pci_dev_driver(devs->vdev->pdev)) { vfio_device_put(device); return -EBUSY; } - vdev = vfio_device_data(device); + tmp = vfio_device_data(device); /* Fault if the device is not unused */ - if (vdev->refcnt) { + if (tmp->refcnt) { vfio_device_put(device); return -EBUSY; } @@ -1590,6 +1592,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_try_bus_reset(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) if (!devs.devices) return; + devs.vdev = vdev; if (vfio_pci_for_each_slot_or_bus(vdev->pdev, vfio_pci_get_unused_devs, &devs, slot)) @@ -1634,7 +1637,7 @@ static void __exit vfio_pci_cleanup(void) vfio_pci_uninit_perm_bits(); } -static void __init vfio_pci_fill_ids(char *ids) +static void __init vfio_pci_fill_ids(char *ids, struct pci_driver *driver) { char *p, *id; int rc; @@ -1662,7 +1665,7 @@ static void __init vfio_pci_fill_ids(char *ids) continue; } - rc = pci_add_dynid(&vfio_pci_driver, vendor, device, + rc = pci_add_dynid(driver, vendor, device, subvendor, subdevice, class, class_mask, 0); if (rc) pr_warn("failed to add dynamic id [%04x:%04x[%04x:%04x]] class %#08x/%08x (%d)\n", @@ -1689,7 +1692,7 @@ static int __init vfio_pci_init(void) if (ret) goto out_driver; - vfio_pci_fill_ids(ids); + vfio_pci_fill_ids(ids, &vfio_pci_driver); return 0;
This patch replaces the vfio_pci_driver reference in vfio_pci.c with pci_dev_driver(vdev->pdev) which is more helpful to make the functions be generic to module types. Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)