| Message ID | 20191215223937.19619-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Mainlined, archived |
| Commit | 01b810ed71878785d189d01e4d7425a11203d7a8 |
| Delegated to: | Lorenzo Pieralisi |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] PCI: uniphier: remove module code from built-in driver | expand |
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:39:37AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > builtin_platform_driver() and MODULE_* are always odd combination. > > This file is not compiled as a module by anyone because > CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER is a bool option. > > Let's remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that > when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only. > > We explicitly disallow a driver unbind, since that doesn't have a > sensible use case anyway, and it allows us to drop the ".remove" code. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: > - update commit description > - remove Reviewed-by > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 31 +--------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c > index 8fd7badd59c2..a5401a0b1e58 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c > @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ > #include <linux/bitfield.h> > #include <linux/clk.h> > #include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > #include <linux/iopoll.h> > #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> > #include <linux/irqdomain.h> > -#include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/of_irq.h> > #include <linux/pci.h> > #include <linux/phy/phy.h> > @@ -171,12 +171,6 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_enable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) > writel(PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_ENABLE, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX); > } > > -static void uniphier_pcie_irq_disable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) > -{ > - writel(0, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INT); > - writel(0, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX); > -} > - > static void uniphier_pcie_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d) > { > struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > @@ -397,14 +391,6 @@ static int uniphier_pcie_host_enable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) > return ret; > } > > -static void uniphier_pcie_host_disable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) > -{ > - uniphier_pcie_irq_disable(priv); > - phy_exit(priv->phy); > - reset_control_assert(priv->rst); > - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk); > -} > - > static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { > .start_link = uniphier_pcie_establish_link, > .stop_link = uniphier_pcie_stop_link, > @@ -456,31 +442,16 @@ static int uniphier_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return uniphier_add_pcie_port(priv, pdev); > } > > -static int uniphier_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > -{ > - struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > - > - uniphier_pcie_host_disable(priv); > - > - return 0; > -} > - > static const struct of_device_id uniphier_pcie_match[] = { > { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-pcie", }, > { /* sentinel */ }, > }; > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uniphier_pcie_match); > > static struct platform_driver uniphier_pcie_driver = { > .probe = uniphier_pcie_probe, > - .remove = uniphier_pcie_remove, > .driver = { > .name = "uniphier-pcie", > .of_match_table = uniphier_pcie_match, > }, > }; > builtin_platform_driver(uniphier_pcie_driver); > - > -MODULE_AUTHOR("Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>"); > -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("UniPhier PCIe host controller driver"); > -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > -- > 2.17.1 >
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 07:39:37AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > builtin_platform_driver() and MODULE_* are always odd combination. > > This file is not compiled as a module by anyone because > CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER is a bool option. > > Let's remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that > when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only. > > We explicitly disallow a driver unbind, since that doesn't have a > sensible use case anyway, and it allows us to drop the ".remove" code. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> > --- > > Changes in v2: > - update commit description > - remove Reviewed-by > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 31 +--------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-) Applied to pci/uniphier, thanks. Lorenzo > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c > index 8fd7badd59c2..a5401a0b1e58 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c > @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ > #include <linux/bitfield.h> > #include <linux/clk.h> > #include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > #include <linux/interrupt.h> > #include <linux/iopoll.h> > #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> > #include <linux/irqdomain.h> > -#include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/of_irq.h> > #include <linux/pci.h> > #include <linux/phy/phy.h> > @@ -171,12 +171,6 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_enable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) > writel(PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_ENABLE, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX); > } > > -static void uniphier_pcie_irq_disable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) > -{ > - writel(0, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INT); > - writel(0, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX); > -} > - > static void uniphier_pcie_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d) > { > struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); > @@ -397,14 +391,6 @@ static int uniphier_pcie_host_enable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) > return ret; > } > > -static void uniphier_pcie_host_disable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) > -{ > - uniphier_pcie_irq_disable(priv); > - phy_exit(priv->phy); > - reset_control_assert(priv->rst); > - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk); > -} > - > static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { > .start_link = uniphier_pcie_establish_link, > .stop_link = uniphier_pcie_stop_link, > @@ -456,31 +442,16 @@ static int uniphier_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return uniphier_add_pcie_port(priv, pdev); > } > > -static int uniphier_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > -{ > - struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > - > - uniphier_pcie_host_disable(priv); > - > - return 0; > -} > - > static const struct of_device_id uniphier_pcie_match[] = { > { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-pcie", }, > { /* sentinel */ }, > }; > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uniphier_pcie_match); > > static struct platform_driver uniphier_pcie_driver = { > .probe = uniphier_pcie_probe, > - .remove = uniphier_pcie_remove, > .driver = { > .name = "uniphier-pcie", > .of_match_table = uniphier_pcie_match, > }, > }; > builtin_platform_driver(uniphier_pcie_driver); > - > -MODULE_AUTHOR("Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>"); > -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("UniPhier PCIe host controller driver"); > -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > -- > 2.17.1 >
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c index 8fd7badd59c2..a5401a0b1e58 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ #include <linux/bitfield.h> #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/iopoll.h> #include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h> #include <linux/irqdomain.h> -#include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/of_irq.h> #include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/phy/phy.h> @@ -171,12 +171,6 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_enable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) writel(PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_ENABLE, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX); } -static void uniphier_pcie_irq_disable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) -{ - writel(0, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INT); - writel(0, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX); -} - static void uniphier_pcie_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d) { struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); @@ -397,14 +391,6 @@ static int uniphier_pcie_host_enable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) return ret; } -static void uniphier_pcie_host_disable(struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv) -{ - uniphier_pcie_irq_disable(priv); - phy_exit(priv->phy); - reset_control_assert(priv->rst); - clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk); -} - static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { .start_link = uniphier_pcie_establish_link, .stop_link = uniphier_pcie_stop_link, @@ -456,31 +442,16 @@ static int uniphier_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return uniphier_add_pcie_port(priv, pdev); } -static int uniphier_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) -{ - struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); - - uniphier_pcie_host_disable(priv); - - return 0; -} - static const struct of_device_id uniphier_pcie_match[] = { { .compatible = "socionext,uniphier-pcie", }, { /* sentinel */ }, }; -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, uniphier_pcie_match); static struct platform_driver uniphier_pcie_driver = { .probe = uniphier_pcie_probe, - .remove = uniphier_pcie_remove, .driver = { .name = "uniphier-pcie", .of_match_table = uniphier_pcie_match, }, }; builtin_platform_driver(uniphier_pcie_driver); - -MODULE_AUTHOR("Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>"); -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("UniPhier PCIe host controller driver"); -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
builtin_platform_driver() and MODULE_* are always odd combination. This file is not compiled as a module by anyone because CONFIG_PCIE_UNIPHIER is a bool option. Let's remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only. We explicitly disallow a driver unbind, since that doesn't have a sensible use case anyway, and it allows us to drop the ".remove" code. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> --- Changes in v2: - update commit description - remove Reviewed-by drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 31 +--------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 30 deletions(-)