diff mbox series

[03/16] dt-bindings: atmel-tcb: add microchip,<chip>-tcb

Message ID 1578488123-26127-4-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series add device tree for SAM9X60 SoC and SAM9X60-EK board | expand

Commit Message

Claudiu Beznea Jan. 8, 2020, 12:55 p.m. UTC
Add microchip,<chip>-tcb to DT bindings documentation. This is for
microchip,sam9x60-tcb.

Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Alexandre Belloni Jan. 10, 2020, 1:40 p.m. UTC | #1
On 08/01/2020 14:55:10+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> Add microchip,<chip>-tcb to DT bindings documentation. This is for
> microchip,sam9x60-tcb.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
> index c4a83e364cb6..e1713e41f6e0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>  * Device tree bindings for Atmel Timer Counter Blocks
> -- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "simple-mfd", "syscon".
> -  <chip> can be "at91rm9200" or "at91sam9x5"
> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "microchip,<chip>-tcb",
> +  "simple-mfd", "syscon".
> +  <chip> can be "at91rm9200", "at91sam9x5" or "sam9x60"

atmel,sam9x60-tcb, microchip,at91rm9200-tcb and microchip,at91sam9x5-tcb
are not allowed and the documentation should reflect that.

It would probably be easier to do that on top of the yaml conversion
here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191009224006.5021-2-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com/
Claudiu Beznea Jan. 10, 2020, 2:29 p.m. UTC | #2
On 10.01.2020 15:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 08/01/2020 14:55:10+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> Add microchip,<chip>-tcb to DT bindings documentation. This is for
>> microchip,sam9x60-tcb.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
>> index c4a83e364cb6..e1713e41f6e0 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>>  * Device tree bindings for Atmel Timer Counter Blocks
>> -- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "simple-mfd", "syscon".
>> -  <chip> can be "at91rm9200" or "at91sam9x5"
>> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "microchip,<chip>-tcb",
>> +  "simple-mfd", "syscon".
>> +  <chip> can be "at91rm9200", "at91sam9x5" or "sam9x60"
> 
> atmel,sam9x60-tcb, microchip,at91rm9200-tcb and microchip,at91sam9x5-tcb
> are not allowed and the documentation should reflect that.

OK! I'll double check it.

> 
> It would probably be easier to do that on top of the yaml conversion
> here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191009224006.5021-2-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com/

I don't see this integrated in next-20200110. Am I looking at the wrong branch?

> 
> --
> Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> https://bootlin.com
>
Alexandre Belloni Jan. 10, 2020, 2:32 p.m. UTC | #3
On 10/01/2020 14:29:27+0000, Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10.01.2020 15:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> > 
> > On 08/01/2020 14:55:10+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> >> Add microchip,<chip>-tcb to DT bindings documentation. This is for
> >> microchip,sam9x60-tcb.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt | 5 +++--
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
> >> index c4a83e364cb6..e1713e41f6e0 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
> >> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> >>  * Device tree bindings for Atmel Timer Counter Blocks
> >> -- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "simple-mfd", "syscon".
> >> -  <chip> can be "at91rm9200" or "at91sam9x5"
> >> +- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "microchip,<chip>-tcb",
> >> +  "simple-mfd", "syscon".
> >> +  <chip> can be "at91rm9200", "at91sam9x5" or "sam9x60"
> > 
> > atmel,sam9x60-tcb, microchip,at91rm9200-tcb and microchip,at91sam9x5-tcb
> > are not allowed and the documentation should reflect that.
> 
> OK! I'll double check it.
> 
> > 
> > It would probably be easier to do that on top of the yaml conversion
> > here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191009224006.5021-2-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com/
> 
> I don't see this integrated in next-20200110. Am I looking at the wrong branch?
> 

I had a few comments and I need to resend.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
index c4a83e364cb6..e1713e41f6e0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-tcb.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ 
 * Device tree bindings for Atmel Timer Counter Blocks
-- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "simple-mfd", "syscon".
-  <chip> can be "at91rm9200" or "at91sam9x5"
+- compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-tcb", "microchip,<chip>-tcb",
+  "simple-mfd", "syscon".
+  <chip> can be "at91rm9200", "at91sam9x5" or "sam9x60"
 - reg: Should contain registers location and length
 - #address-cells: has to be 1
 - #size-cells: has to be 0