Message ID | 20200205105955.28143-3-kraxel@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/virtio: rework backing storage handling | expand |
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:00 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote: > > Add new virtio_gpu_cleanup_object() helper function for object cleanup. > Wire up callback function for resource unref, do cleanup from callback > when we know the host stopped using the resource. > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 3 ++- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 19 ++++++++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h > index 7e69c06e168e..372dd248cf02 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h > @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_cmd_create_resource(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > struct virtio_gpu_object_array *objs, > struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence); > void virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > - uint32_t resource_id); > + struct virtio_gpu_object *bo); > void virtio_gpu_cmd_transfer_to_host_2d(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > uint64_t offset, > uint32_t width, uint32_t height, > @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_fence_event_process(struct virtio_gpu_device *vdev, > u64 last_seq); > > /* virtio_gpu_object */ > +void virtio_gpu_cleanup_object(struct virtio_gpu_object *bo); > struct drm_gem_object *virtio_gpu_create_object(struct drm_device *dev, > size_t size); > int virtio_gpu_object_create(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c > index 017a9e0fc3bb..28a161af7503 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c > @@ -61,6 +61,14 @@ static void virtio_gpu_resource_id_put(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, uint32_t > } > } > > +void virtio_gpu_cleanup_object(struct virtio_gpu_object *bo) > +{ > + struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev = bo->base.base.dev->dev_private; > + > + virtio_gpu_resource_id_put(vgdev, bo->hw_res_handle); > + drm_gem_shmem_free_object(&bo->base.base); > +} > + > static void virtio_gpu_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj) > { > struct virtio_gpu_object *bo = gem_to_virtio_gpu_obj(obj); > @@ -68,11 +76,12 @@ static void virtio_gpu_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj) > > if (bo->pages) > virtio_gpu_object_detach(vgdev, bo); > - if (bo->created) > - virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource(vgdev, bo->hw_res_handle); > - virtio_gpu_resource_id_put(vgdev, bo->hw_res_handle); > - > - drm_gem_shmem_free_object(obj); > + if (bo->created) { > + virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource(vgdev, bo); > + /* completion handler calls virtio_gpu_cleanup_object() */ nitpick: we don't need this comment when virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_cb is defined by this file and passed to virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource. I happen to be looking at our error handling paths. I think we want virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer to call vbuf->resp_cb on errors. > + return; > + } > + virtio_gpu_cleanup_object(bo); > } > > static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs virtio_gpu_gem_funcs = { > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c > index 6d6d55dc384e..6e8097e4c214 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c > @@ -152,6 +152,15 @@ static void *virtio_gpu_alloc_cmd(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > sizeof(struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr), NULL); > } > > +static void *virtio_gpu_alloc_cmd_cb(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > + struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer **vbuffer_p, > + int size, > + virtio_gpu_resp_cb cb) > +{ > + return virtio_gpu_alloc_cmd_resp(vgdev, cb, vbuffer_p, size, > + sizeof(struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr), NULL); > +} > + > static void free_vbuf(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf) > { > @@ -494,17 +503,37 @@ void virtio_gpu_cmd_create_resource(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > bo->created = true; > } > > +static void virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_cb(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > + struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf) > +{ > + struct virtio_gpu_object *bo; > + > + bo = gem_to_virtio_gpu_obj(vbuf->objs->objs[0]); > + kfree(vbuf->objs); > + vbuf->objs = NULL; > + > + virtio_gpu_cleanup_object(bo); > +} > + > void virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, > - uint32_t resource_id) > + struct virtio_gpu_object *bo) > { > struct virtio_gpu_resource_unref *cmd_p; > struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf; > > - cmd_p = virtio_gpu_alloc_cmd(vgdev, &vbuf, sizeof(*cmd_p)); > + cmd_p = virtio_gpu_alloc_cmd_cb(vgdev, &vbuf, sizeof(*cmd_p), > + virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_cb); > memset(cmd_p, 0, sizeof(*cmd_p)); > > cmd_p->hdr.type = cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_GPU_CMD_RESOURCE_UNREF); > - cmd_p->resource_id = cpu_to_le32(resource_id); > + cmd_p->resource_id = cpu_to_le32(bo->hw_res_handle); > + > + /* > + * We are in the release callback and do NOT want refcount > + * bo, so do NOT use virtio_gpu_array_add_obj(). > + */ > + vbuf->objs = virtio_gpu_array_alloc(1); > + vbuf->objs->objs[0] = &bo->base.base This is an abuse of obj array. Add "void *private_data;" to virtio_gpu_vbuffer and use that maybe? Otherwise, simply // abuse objs field to pass our private data; must reset in the resp_cb vbuf->objs = (virtio_gpu_object_array *) bo; makes it easier to see what is going on. > > virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer(vgdev, vbuf); > } > -- > 2.18.1 >
> > - > > - drm_gem_shmem_free_object(obj); > > + if (bo->created) { > > + virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource(vgdev, bo); > > + /* completion handler calls virtio_gpu_cleanup_object() */ > nitpick: we don't need this comment when virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_cb is > defined by this file and passed to virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource. I want virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_cb + virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource being placed next to each other so it is easier to see how they work hand in hand. > I happen to be looking at our error handling paths. I think we want > virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer to call vbuf->resp_cb on errors. /me was thinking about that too. Yes, we will need either that, or a separate vbuf->error_cb callback. That'll be another patch though. > > + /* > > + * We are in the release callback and do NOT want refcount > > + * bo, so do NOT use virtio_gpu_array_add_obj(). > > + */ > > + vbuf->objs = virtio_gpu_array_alloc(1); > > + vbuf->objs->objs[0] = &bo->base.base > This is an abuse of obj array. Add "void *private_data;" to > virtio_gpu_vbuffer and use that maybe? I'd name that *cb_data, but yes, that makes sense. cheers, Gerd
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 10:43 PM Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > - > > > - drm_gem_shmem_free_object(obj); > > > + if (bo->created) { > > > + virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource(vgdev, bo); > > > + /* completion handler calls virtio_gpu_cleanup_object() */ > > nitpick: we don't need this comment when virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_cb is > > defined by this file and passed to virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource. > > I want virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_cb + virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource being > placed next to each other so it is easier to see how they work hand in > hand. > > > I happen to be looking at our error handling paths. I think we want > > virtio_gpu_queue_fenced_ctrl_buffer to call vbuf->resp_cb on errors. > > /me was thinking about that too. Yes, we will need either that, > or a separate vbuf->error_cb callback. That'll be another patch > though. Or the new virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_sgs can return errors rather than eating errors. Yeah, that should be another patch. > > > > + /* > > > + * We are in the release callback and do NOT want refcount > > > + * bo, so do NOT use virtio_gpu_array_add_obj(). > > > + */ > > > + vbuf->objs = virtio_gpu_array_alloc(1); > > > + vbuf->objs->objs[0] = &bo->base.base > > This is an abuse of obj array. Add "void *private_data;" to > > virtio_gpu_vbuffer and use that maybe? > > I'd name that *cb_data, but yes, that makes sense. Sounds great. > > cheers, > Gerd >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h index 7e69c06e168e..372dd248cf02 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_cmd_create_resource(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, struct virtio_gpu_object_array *objs, struct virtio_gpu_fence *fence); void virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, - uint32_t resource_id); + struct virtio_gpu_object *bo); void virtio_gpu_cmd_transfer_to_host_2d(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, uint64_t offset, uint32_t width, uint32_t height, @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_fence_event_process(struct virtio_gpu_device *vdev, u64 last_seq); /* virtio_gpu_object */ +void virtio_gpu_cleanup_object(struct virtio_gpu_object *bo); struct drm_gem_object *virtio_gpu_create_object(struct drm_device *dev, size_t size); int virtio_gpu_object_create(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c index 017a9e0fc3bb..28a161af7503 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c @@ -61,6 +61,14 @@ static void virtio_gpu_resource_id_put(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, uint32_t } } +void virtio_gpu_cleanup_object(struct virtio_gpu_object *bo) +{ + struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev = bo->base.base.dev->dev_private; + + virtio_gpu_resource_id_put(vgdev, bo->hw_res_handle); + drm_gem_shmem_free_object(&bo->base.base); +} + static void virtio_gpu_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj) { struct virtio_gpu_object *bo = gem_to_virtio_gpu_obj(obj); @@ -68,11 +76,12 @@ static void virtio_gpu_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj) if (bo->pages) virtio_gpu_object_detach(vgdev, bo); - if (bo->created) - virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource(vgdev, bo->hw_res_handle); - virtio_gpu_resource_id_put(vgdev, bo->hw_res_handle); - - drm_gem_shmem_free_object(obj); + if (bo->created) { + virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource(vgdev, bo); + /* completion handler calls virtio_gpu_cleanup_object() */ + return; + } + virtio_gpu_cleanup_object(bo); } static const struct drm_gem_object_funcs virtio_gpu_gem_funcs = { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c index 6d6d55dc384e..6e8097e4c214 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c @@ -152,6 +152,15 @@ static void *virtio_gpu_alloc_cmd(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, sizeof(struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr), NULL); } +static void *virtio_gpu_alloc_cmd_cb(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, + struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer **vbuffer_p, + int size, + virtio_gpu_resp_cb cb) +{ + return virtio_gpu_alloc_cmd_resp(vgdev, cb, vbuffer_p, size, + sizeof(struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr), NULL); +} + static void free_vbuf(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf) { @@ -494,17 +503,37 @@ void virtio_gpu_cmd_create_resource(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, bo->created = true; } +static void virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_cb(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, + struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf) +{ + struct virtio_gpu_object *bo; + + bo = gem_to_virtio_gpu_obj(vbuf->objs->objs[0]); + kfree(vbuf->objs); + vbuf->objs = NULL; + + virtio_gpu_cleanup_object(bo); +} + void virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_resource(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev, - uint32_t resource_id) + struct virtio_gpu_object *bo) { struct virtio_gpu_resource_unref *cmd_p; struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer *vbuf; - cmd_p = virtio_gpu_alloc_cmd(vgdev, &vbuf, sizeof(*cmd_p)); + cmd_p = virtio_gpu_alloc_cmd_cb(vgdev, &vbuf, sizeof(*cmd_p), + virtio_gpu_cmd_unref_cb); memset(cmd_p, 0, sizeof(*cmd_p)); cmd_p->hdr.type = cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_GPU_CMD_RESOURCE_UNREF); - cmd_p->resource_id = cpu_to_le32(resource_id); + cmd_p->resource_id = cpu_to_le32(bo->hw_res_handle); + + /* + * We are in the release callback and do NOT want refcount + * bo, so do NOT use virtio_gpu_array_add_obj(). + */ + vbuf->objs = virtio_gpu_array_alloc(1); + vbuf->objs->objs[0] = &bo->base.base; virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer(vgdev, vbuf); }
Add new virtio_gpu_cleanup_object() helper function for object cleanup. Wire up callback function for resource unref, do cleanup from callback when we know the host stopped using the resource. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.h | 3 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 19 ++++++++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)